创始人宣布 '死亡' 后，ElizaOS 代币暴跌 19% 至历史新低

cointelegraphPubblicato 2026-08-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-06

Introduzione

创始人宣布项目“死亡”后，ElizaOS代币在24小时内暴跌19%，创下历史新低。CoinGecko数据显示，该代币跌至0.000285美元，市值仅剩210万美元。创始人肖·沃尔特斯表示，Eliza基金会正在关闭，他不再拥有或支持该代币，并称“代币已完全死亡”。不过，开源的Eliza软件将继续开发，但未来不会再与任何代币关联。此次暴跌标志着一个戏剧性逆转。该项目前身为AI16Z，曾在2025年1月达到25亿美元市值峰值，后因品牌混淆问题更名为ElizaOS。沃尔特斯将项目失败归咎于一场由部分代币持有者提起的诉讼。该诉讼指控项目方存在虚假宣传和不当得利等行为。尽管沃尔特斯称诉讼“荒谬”，但项目因缺乏资金继续应诉而选择和解，并将剩余资金移交给了原告。他强调，此后将不会有任何资金用于回购代币或提供支持。 ElizaOS是一个用于构建和管理AI智能体的开源框架，最初于2024年10月以ai16z之名启动。

在 Eliza Labs 创始人肖·沃尔特斯表示该代币已'死亡'且 Eliza 基金会正在解散后，ElizaOS 在 24 小时内下跌了 19%，创下历史新低。

CoinGecko 数据显示，截至撰写本文时，该代币的交易价格为 0.000285 美元，此前于周四触及 0.000284 美元的历史低点，市值为 210 万美元。

此次下跌发生在沃尔特斯宣布基金会即将解散之后。'代币死了。完全死了，'沃尔特斯说，并补充说他不再拥有或支持该代币。他表示，开源 Eliza 软件的开发将在没有代币或基金会的情况下继续进行。

对于 AI 代理领域昔日的爆发性代币之一，这一暴跌标志着一场急剧的逆转。根据 CoinGecko 的数据，在该项目更名为 ElizaOS 之前，当时名为 AI16Z 的代币在 2025 年 1 月达到了 25 亿美元的市值峰值。

ElizaOS 的 24 小时价格图表。来源：CoinGecko

创始人归咎于诉讼和代币文化

沃尔特斯表示，Eliza Labs 已与由 Burwick Law 代理的一组代币持有者私下达成和解，同意将其剩余的库房资金给予他们。

他称这起诉讼'荒谬'，但表示该项目缺乏继续抗争的资金。

该诉讼于 4 月提起，将 Eliza Labs、沃尔特斯、塞巴斯蒂安·奎因-沃森和 AI16Z DAO 列为被告。诉讼指控其虚假广告、欺骗性做法、过失性虚假陈述和不当得利。

法庭记录显示，指定原告的索赔已于 7 月 8 日通过约定被驳回且具有偏见，而拟议集体诉讼的索赔被驳回但不带偏见。

Cointelegraph 联系了沃尔特斯和 Burwick Law 创始人马克斯·伯威克寻求评论，但在发稿前未收到回复。

相关阅读：CZ：并非每个 AI 代理都需要自己的加密货币

沃尔特斯表示，已没有资金用于代币回购，也没有基金会或未来的供应干预来支持该代币。

他还表示，在继续构建其底层操作系统的同时，他不会允许另一个代币与 Eliza 产生关联。

'我正在重新开始，因为我拥有知识产权，我再也不会让一个代币接近 Eliza 了 [...] 我永远不会支持 Eliza 代币，'他写道。

ElizaOS 是一个用于构建和管理 AI 代理的开源框架。该项目于 2024 年 10 月以 ai16z 的名称启动，最初目标是筹集 75,000 美元来构建一个自主投资者。

2025 年 1 月，在 Andreessen Horowitz 对其品牌 a16z 可能引起的混淆表示担忧后，项目更名为 ElizaOS。代币后来也进行了迁移。

杂志：Coldcard 攻击是否意味着所有硬件钱包现在都不安全？

Crypto di tendenza

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Domande pertinenti

QElizaOS代币价格在24小时内下跌了多少百分比，创始人对此有何表态？

AElizaOS代币价格在24小时内下跌了19%，跌至历史最低点。其创始人肖·沃尔特斯宣布该项目代币已“死亡”，并正在逐步关闭Eliza基金会。

Q导致ElizaOS项目停止支持其代币并结束基金会运作的主要原因是什么？

A主要原因是一起诉讼的和解。创始人肖·沃尔特斯表示，Eliza Labs已与部分代币持有者达成私下和解，同意将剩余金库和资金给予他们。由于缺乏资金继续应对诉讼，项目被迫停止运营。

Q根据文章，ElizaOS代币（前身为AI16Z）的历史最高市值是多少？

A根据CoinGecko的数据，该代币在2025年1月，即项目更名为ElizaOS之前，曾达到25亿美元的历史最高市值。

Q肖·沃尔特斯对于未来将Eliza项目与代币重新关联持什么态度？

A肖·沃尔特斯态度坚决地表示反对。他声称自己拥有项目知识产权，将重新开始，并绝不允许任何代币再与Eliza项目产生关联，也永远不会支持Eliza代币。

QElizaOS项目最初的目标和功能是什么？

AElizaOS是一个用于构建和管理AI智能体的开源框架。该项目于2024年10月以ai16z的名称启动，最初目标是筹集75,000美元来构建一个自主投资者。

Letture associate

19 New Decacorns in Half a Year: Why is the Primary Market Chasing 'Certainty'?

In the first half of 2026, China’s primary market saw a notable increase in unicorns, adding 19 new companies each valued over 100 billion RMB, particularly in sectors like embodied AI and large language models (LLMs). Firms such as Galaxy General, Zibian, and ZhiPingFang even surpassed 200 billion RMB valuations within months. Moonshot AI's valuation surged from around $10 billion to $35 billion by July 2026, with a pre-IPO target of $50 billion. This concentration of capital into a few "certain" sectors highlights a market shift. The driving force is not a general abundance of capital but a chase for "certainty"—primarily clearer exit pathways like imminent IPOs. Companies with defined public listing timelines attract intense investment despite higher valuations, as they reduce exit uncertainty for investors. Secondary market valuations of listed peers also serve as new anchors, boosting the perceived value of private companies in similar fields, though this creates dependency on public market sentiment. Another form of certainty comes from the expectation of rising valuations in subsequent funding rounds. The investment logic has shifted in some cases from assessing long-term fundamental value to betting on the next round attracting higher prices. This dynamic is also seen in deep-tech areas like nuclear fusion, where firms like NeoFusion secured a 10.6 billion RMB valuation despite early commercial stages, driven by scarcity and strategic bets. However, this trend signals a risk transfer: technical uncertainties remain but are temporarily masked by valuation inflation. As valuations climb—50 billion to 200 billion or 500 billion RMB—companies face increasing pressure to demonstrate real revenue, profit, and sustainable business models. The danger lies not in the rise of unicorns itself, but if valuations become detached from value creation and rely merely on the expectation of future funding or exits. Ultimately, the surge reflects investors seeking perceived safety in shorter-term exit certainty and transactional momentum, rather than a renewed appetite for risk. The true test will come when the market inevitably refocuses on fundamentals, questioning how many of today’s high valuations are backed by genuine economic value.

marsbit9 min fa

19 New Decacorns in Half a Year: Why is the Primary Market Chasing 'Certainty'?

marsbit9 min fa

Just Now, Sam Altman Blasts Dario Amodei as 'Anti-Human', Secret Model Exposed the Same Day

Just now, Sam Altman strongly criticized Dario (Amodei, co-founder of Anthropic), denouncing his "doomsday marketing" as "anti-human dictator rhetoric." This came alongside the accidental exposure of OpenAI's next-generation model, codenamed "gpt-nathree," hinting at the imminent release of GPT-6 Astra. The leak occurred when an OpenAI employee's public GitHub commit mentioned the codename. Combined with previous leaks of "gpt-mewfour," it suggests these are iterative checkpoints for OpenAI's upcoming agent model, Astra. Astra is known for multi-agent collaboration and long-duration task handling, having reportedly solved previously unsolved mathematical problems. Meanwhile, two new Anthropic model codenames, "claude-marshmallow-eap" and "claude-melon-eap," were also exposed but are believed to be iterations of the Claude 5 series, not a new flagship. In a wide-ranging podcast interview, Altman admitted he was wrong about the speed of AI-driven disruption, acknowledging societal inertia slows adoption. He fiercely criticized rivals' marketing that simultaneously promises immense benefits (like curing cancer) and warns of existential risk, calling it a dangerous "benevolent dictator" narrative that seeks to concentrate power. He emphasized that people are the ultimate purpose of AI. Altman also revealed OpenAI's unconventional, consensus-defying path: spending four and a half years in the "dark" without a public product before ChatGPT's breakthrough, driven by scaling laws rather than early customer feedback. He concluded that even with superintelligent AI, genuine human connection will remain irreplaceably valuable.

marsbit49 min fa

Just Now, Sam Altman Blasts Dario Amodei as 'Anti-Human', Secret Model Exposed the Same Day

marsbit49 min fa

Robinhood Chain's On-Chain Landscape Heats Up Again, $PONS Becomes the Cheapest High-Revenue Token

Robinhood Chain's token launchpad Pons ($PONS) has emerged as an outlier among high-revenue crypto tokens. According to Blockworks Research data, $PONS ranked 13th in revenue generation over the past 30 days, yet it holds the lowest FDV/revenue multiple at just 0.7x among the top 15 revenue-generating tokens. This stands in stark contrast to competitors like Pump.fun (7.7x), Aave (45.2x), and Chainlink (212.2x). Pons, often compared to pump.fun, is a non-custodial launchpad on Robinhood Chain. Its V2 upgrade introduced a bonding curve mechanism, with a portion of protocol fees directed to creators and the remainder constituting protocol revenue. Crucially, approximately 80% of this revenue is used to buy back and burn $PONS tokens, leading to a nearly 30% reduction in total supply to date. Despite this aggressive deflationary mechanism and significant revenue, the market prices $PONS conservatively. This skepticism stems from concerns over the quality and sustainability of its revenue, with some users questioning the potential impact of wash trading on reported figures. While supply continues to shrink, broader market recognition and a valuation multiple closer to peers will likely depend on sustained verification of genuine, high-quality protocol income.

marsbit59 min fa

Robinhood Chain's On-Chain Landscape Heats Up Again, $PONS Becomes the Cheapest High-Revenue Token

marsbit59 min fa

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

"Rescuing US Treasuries" Relay: After Bessent's Miss, All Eyes Are on Walsh Last week, US Treasury Secretary Bessent's announcement to at least double long-term Treasury buybacks failed to sustainably lower yields, which quickly rebounded. The market response saw a drop in the dollar alongside surges in gold and Bitcoin, interpreted as a "pressure release valve" for anxiety. The focus now shifts to Fed Chairman Walsh's upcoming Jackson Hole speech. Markets are highly sensitive to his message, seeking clarity on the Fed's policy response to stubborn inflation and worsening fiscal conditions. Analysts warn that a lack of new guidance could disappoint markets and worsen the sell-off in long-dated bonds. Analysts question the scale of Bessent's operations, noting they are too small relative to the overall debt market and do not constitute quantitative easing. A key issue is the Fed's massive holdings of long-term bonds, which distorts the market. With the Fed holding low-yielding short-term bonds that are losing money relative to its policy rate, discussion is growing around a potential Fed-led "Operation Twist." This would involve selling short-term bonds to buy long-term ones, aiming to lower long-end yields without expanding the balance sheet. The upcoming PCE inflation data will set the stage for Walsh's speech. However, the window for action is narrowing amid political pressures. A critical threshold is the 30-year yield at 5%; holding above it could increase stress on the dollar and leveraged sectors. Overall, the article suggests that without coordinated Fed action to anchor inflation expectations, Treasury interventions may ultimately fail, with investors increasingly looking to assets like gold as hedges.

marsbit1 h fa

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

marsbit1 h fa

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

Hyperliquid’s Compliance Path: From Permissionless to Permissioned HIP-3 Hyperliquid currently blocks U.S. access because its permissionless, on-chain infrastructure conflicts with U.S. market structure laws, which restrict futures trading to registered exchanges, clearinghouses, and brokers. Through its Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), the project is advocating for regulatory modernization, proposing that regulated entities be allowed to build products on HyperCore (its exchange and clearing layer) while fulfilling their compliance obligations. The platform’s modular stack separates roles like a traditional exchange (DCM), clearinghouse (DCO), and broker (FCM), but reconstructs them on-chain with code. This enables permissionless access, self-custody, and 24/7 global trading, but clashes with U.S. rules requiring KYC, specific margin models, and custodial arrangements. To resolve this, HPC is engaging with U.S. regulators (CFTC, SEC) to seek clarity that deploying on-chain software does not itself trigger licensing, and to establish exemptions allowing non-custodial wallets to route users to regulated derivatives. Recent political signals suggest openness to this approach. On the technical side, Hyperliquid Labs has introduced permissioned HIP-3 deployers on testnet. These allow regulated entities to launch markets, perform KYC, and whitelist compliant users. While these create separate order books, whitelisted market makers can bridge liquidity between them, ensuring deep, shared liquidity across the same L1. Features like payload-based “PA” permissions enable DEX-level account controls (e.g., reduce-only orders), mirroring traditional broker authorities. The strategy is not to open the native, permissionless front-end to U.S. users, but to position Hyperliquid as neutral infrastructure that U.S. regulated firms can use while meeting their legal duties. This paves a compliant path for U.S. investor access while preserving the protocol’s core, permissionless nature.

marsbit1 h fa

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ELIZAOS

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di elizaOS (ELIZAOS) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente elizaOSELIZAOS.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva elizaOS (ELIZAOS)Dopo aver acquistato elizaOS (ELIZAOS), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia elizaOS (ELIZAOS)Scambia facilmente elizaOS (ELIZAOS) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

402 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.11.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ELIZAOS ELIZAOS sono presentate come di seguito.