年初以来SOXL涨了225%,半导体ETF却几乎没动,这差距有点意思

投研日志Pubblicato 2026-07-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-21

Introduzione

半导体ETF今天收在4378点,涨了0.51%,基本就是原地踏步。

半导体ETF今天收在4378点,涨了0.51%,基本就是原地踏步。但你翻翻它的成分股,完全是另一番天地:

SOXL(三倍做多半导体的那个):年初至今 +225.51%

USD(ProShares的做多半导体ETF):+58.94%

FTXL(富达那只):+76.35%

DRAM相关的品种:+96.52%

说白了,整个板块是靠杠杆产品和个别票硬拉起来的。反观英伟达那边的杠杆ETF,NVDL和NVDU才涨了4%出头,跟存储方向的票一比,寒气逼人。

DRAM这玩意儿年初到现在快翻倍了——这也正好撞上了半导体圈最近吵得最凶的话题:NAND价格还能不能接着涨?

想看清楚这轮行情到底是谁在带队,可以去moomoo的"投资主题"里把成分股拉出来,把60日涨幅和年初至今放一起比,比瞎猜靠谱。

但话说回来,杠杆品种涨这么多,说明行情已经跑了一大截。三倍杠杆这东西,涨起来爽,跌起来也疼。

现在AI硬件股被市场拿着放大镜看估值,这周还有英特尔和特斯拉的财报等着落地。接下来就看存储这块是继续扛旗,还是开始松劲了。

+225%是过去式,不是未来式。

还在车上的朋友,你们觉得DRAM还能拿吗?还是说这趟车已经挤得快要超载了?

Letture associate

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手45 min fa

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手45 min fa

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手1 h fa

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片