当转账彻底无感:Sui 用「零 Gas」成为稳定币支付底层轨道

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-22

Introduzione

Sui于2026年5月20日推出零Gas稳定币转账功能,用户与企业点对点发送白名单内稳定币时无需支付Gas费,也无需管理SUI代币余额。这一功能基于全新的底层账户架构Address Balances,通过特定Move函数发送代币,能自动合并到接收方地址的单一余额中,省去了对象管理的开销,使得验证者处理成本极低,从而实现了真正意义上的零成本转账。 此举旨在消除区块链支付的传统门槛,为稳定币从“加密资产”转向“支付轨道”铺平道路。它直接开启了日常支付(如消费、打赏、跨境汇款)、AI Agent经济中的高频微支付以及机构级应用(如B2B支付、结算分润)等场景的大规模采用可能。机构级托管平台Fireblocks等已宣布支持该功能。 零Gas转账是Sui构建“稳定币支付默认底座”的上半场。下半场计划在2026年内推出协议级保密交易功能,实现兼具隐私保护与合规审计能力的大规模免费支付。随着其网络稳定币转账量已突破1万亿美元,零Gas功能有望成为推动稳定币支付大规模采用的关键引线。

作者:深潮 TechFlow

你去 ATM 转账,ATM 告诉你必须先花钱买「ATM 使用券」,你可能会觉得这个 ATM 疯了。

但这是区块链过去十几年的运作规则:想转一笔账,先准备好 Gas。

当稳定币在支付领域的角色日益关键,这道门槛的代价也更加清晰:增量用户被挡在门外,支付场景难以跑通。

作为构建「稳定币支付底层轨道」的关键举措,2026 年 5 月 20 日,Sui 宣布推出零 Gas 稳定币转账功能,支持用户与企业点对点发送稳定币而无需支付 Gas 费,也无需管理单独的 SUI 代币余额。

虽然目前,这项功能还仅支持白名单内稳定币 P2P 转账,但现在稳定币真正有机会从「加密资产」变成「支付轨道」了,而实现这一切的人,也将进一步成为「稳定币支付默认底座」有力竞争者。

一种全新的「零 Gas」,没人在背后帮你付钱

一提到零 Gas,大多数用户的第一反应或许会是:谁帮我付了 Gas ?

这种惯性思维源于过去种种不彻底的「零 Gas」尝试:要么补贴,要么中继,Gas 并未消失,只是有人在后台悄悄帮你结账,治标不治本。

而 Sui 的「零 Gas 稳定币转账」瞄准的就是底层根本。

它建立在一套全新的底层账户架构 Address Balances 之上,代币通过特定 Move 函数发送时,会自动合并到接收方地址的单一余额中,无需创建或管理 Coin 对象,省去了对象创建、拆分、合并和版本追踪的开销,验证者处理成本极低,低到可以不向用户收取费用。

成本降下来了,边界也要划清楚:在高度受限的 PTB 机制下,只有白名单内稳定币的 P2P 转账、且金额不低于 0.01,才会被判定为零 Gas,既支持了支付场景,又隔绝了恶意交易。

这条轨道,能跑什么?

首先打开的便是日常支付的大门。当体验无感、成本归零,那些我们曾经对稳定币寄予厚望的支付场景,包括消费、打赏、订阅、跨境汇款等,都有了快速渗透的可能。稳定币支付,第一次具备了和传统支付工具正面竞争的基础条件,甚至更快、更好。

当然,对于高频微支付场景,很多人会想到 Agent 经济。以往,AI 自主交易、套利等动作背后都需要额外的 Gas 管理,而零 Gas 稳定币转账将成为 Agent 成本最低、阻力最小的选择,结合 Sui 的高性能优势,进一步支持大规模部署自主支付流。

另外一个关键词是:机构。这是 Sui 官方特意强调的群体。不管是跨境 B2B 支付、供应商结算还是平台分润,机构面临的支付摩擦往往更高,而协议级零 Gas 机制让稳定币真正变成机构可以直接调用的支付工具。

值得一提的是,在零 Gas 功能上线时,Fireblocks 就已经宣布支持地址余额,随后不久便支持无 Gas 稳定币转账,进一步增强了 Sui 支付基础设施对机构的可访问性。与此同时,多家机构级托管平台与钱也宣布将支持零 Gas 交易。

零 Gas 上半场,隐私下半场

自 2025 年 8 月以来,Sui 网络稳定币转账交易量已突破 1 万亿美元,这个数字足以说明 Sui 生态稳定币支付底层逻辑已经跑通,零 Gas 稳定币转账的推出无疑将加速 Sui「稳定币支付默认底座」的构建。

但这只是 2026 年 Sui 支付叙事的上半场。

关于下半场,Mysten Labs 产品团队已多次预热:2026 年内将推出协议级的保密交易功能,目标是实现大规模、免费且具备隐私保护的支付。

转账不仅零成本,还能隐藏交易金额和部分细节,保留必要的审计与合规能力。

这套组合拳对于采用十分关键,尤其对于机构而言,因为合规要求越高,保密交易价值越大。

让钱像信息一样流动。

这称得上是贯穿 Sui 所有技术、生态动作的一句话。

而现在,从支付到 Agent 再到机构,决定大规模采用的那条引线,或许正在由零 Gas 稳定币转账点燃。

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QSui 推出的‘零 Gas 稳定币转账’功能支持什么类型的交易?

A该功能目前支持白名单内稳定币的点对点转账,并且要求转账金额不低于0.01,交易才会被判定为零 Gas。

QSui 的‘零 Gas’功能与传统‘零 Gas’尝试有何根本区别?

A传统‘零 Gas’尝试往往通过补贴或中继方式,由他人或项目方在后台替用户支付 Gas 费,是治标不治本的方案。而 Sui 的‘零 Gas’通过底层账户架构 Address Balances 和特定 Move 函数,从根源上极大降低了验证者的处理成本,使系统本身无需向用户收取 Gas 费。

Q文章中提到,Sui 的零 Gas 功能主要瞄准了哪三个应用场景?

A主要瞄准三个应用场景:1. 日常支付,如消费、打赏、订阅和跨境汇款。2. 高频微支付和 Agent 经济,为 AI 自主交易等提供低成本选择。3. 机构应用,如跨境 B2B 支付、供应商结算和平台分润,降低机构的支付摩擦。

Q文章指出,Sui 在 2026 年支付叙事的下半场将推出什么关键功能?

A2026 年内,Sui 计划推出协议级的保密交易功能,目标是实现大规模、免费且具备隐私保护的支付。该功能可以隐藏交易金额和部分细节,同时保留必要的审计与合规能力。

Q为什么文章作者认为 Sui 的零 Gas 功能对机构用户尤其重要?

A因为机构面临的支付摩擦(如跨境 B2B、结算、分润)往往更高,而协议级的零 Gas 机制能让稳定币成为机构可以直接调用、成本极低的支付工具。同时,Fireblocks 等机构级托管平台的支持,也增强了该功能对机构用户的可访问性。

Letture associate

Government Intervention in the Bond Market: What Does It Mean?

On August 19, 2026, the U.S. Treasury unexpectedly announced it would at least double the size of its long-term Treasury buyback operations, starting September 9. The move triggered an immediate market reaction, with the 30-year yield falling 9 basis points. This intervention came against a backdrop of the 30-year yield hitting a 19-year high of 5.34% the previous day, driven by persistent inflation, high oil prices, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health with public debt surpassing $40 trillion, and a global "buyers' strike" for long-dated bonds. Treasury buybacks involve the government repurchasing older, less liquid bonds from the market via reverse auctions to improve market functioning, not to reduce overall debt. While the action provided tactical relief and signaled the Treasury's willingness to intervene, analysts caution it does not address core structural issues: massive fiscal deficits, high borrowing needs, and fading demand from traditional buyers like foreign central banks. For investors, the announcement offered short-term support for long-duration bond ETFs and boosted assets like gold, which rose 2.7%. However, it's unlikely to significantly lower mortgage rates or alter the challenging environment for long-term bonds. The key takeaway is the distinction between a tactical market operation and the unresolved structural pressures that continue to push yields higher, requiring close monitoring of upcoming economic data, Treasury auctions, and potential signals of more aggressive policy measures.

marsbit5 min fa

Government Intervention in the Bond Market: What Does It Mean?

marsbit5 min fa

After 'Bessent Put', How Far Is the U.S. from Restarting QE?

Following an unscheduled announcement from the U.S. Treasury Department on August 19th, investor discussions have intensified regarding the potential for future policy interventions in long-term bond markets. The Treasury increased the maximum size of its regular buyback operations for 10-to-30 year bonds from $2 billion to $4 billion, citing a desire to improve liquidity. This move came shortly after a surge in long-term yields, with the 30-year Treasury yield briefly touching 5.34%. Market analysts, rather than focusing on the modest operational size, have interpreted the timing—outside the normal quarterly communication window—as a significant signal. The move has been dubbed the "Bessent Put," implying the market's growing expectation that Treasury officials, led by Deputy Secretary Josh Bessent, may act to prevent a disorderly rise in long-term borrowing costs. This perception represents a potential shift in the market's view of the government's "policy reaction function." The underlying pressures on long-term bonds are multifaceted, including large fiscal deficits, increased Treasury supply, a rise in corporate debt issuance for AI infrastructure (creating a "crowding out" effect), and uncertainty around foreign holdings, particularly from Japan. Geopolitical risks in the Middle East further complicate the policy landscape, potentially creating conflicting pressures between fighting inflation and managing financing costs. However, the article clarifies that this Treasury buyback program is distinct from Quantitative Easing (QE). It is a debt management operation, not a Federal Reserve balance sheet expansion. While the announcement opens the door for market speculation about more forceful tools like Yield Curve Control (YCC) or a return to QE, analysts note that conditions would need to deteriorate significantly for such measures to be implemented. For now, the "Bessent Put" reflects a change in market expectations about possible policy boundaries, not an imminent launch of new monetary stimulus.

marsbit5 min fa

After 'Bessent Put', How Far Is the U.S. from Restarting QE?

marsbit5 min fa

Is Stablecoin Really Necessary for Cross-border Payments?

"Is Stablecoin Truly Necessary for Cross-Border Payments? While stablecoins are often praised as superior for cross-border transfers—especially if the recipient desires crypto—their advantage is less clear in traditional cross-currency scenarios (e.g., USD to Mexican Peso). The existing correspondent banking system is slow and costly (≈15% fees) due to multiple intermediaries. Modern fintech solutions like Wise have dramatically improved this by using a netting model: they hold local currency pools and settle payments domestically, avoiding actual cross-border fund movement. This offers near-instant transfers with low, transparent fees (averaging ~0.52%). The 'stablecoin sandwich' model (convert fiat to stablecoin, transfer on-chain, convert to local fiat) offers similar user experience but doesn't inherently provide major cost or speed advantages over fintech. Its on-chain transfer is cheap, but fiat conversion spreads remain. Stablecoin's real innovation is 'unbundling' the cross-border payment stack. Instead of requiring a proprietary global network like Wise, businesses only need reliable on- and off-ramps in specific corridors. This lowers market entry barriers, fosters competition among local providers, and can drive down costs, particularly for niche or underserved corridors (e.g., US to Africa). While vertical integration may reoccur, the open, permissionless nature of the underlying blockchain layer makes monopolistic pricing difficult. The long-term benefit is the potential redistribution of value—previously captured as intermediary rents—to consumers through lower costs."

marsbit9 min fa

Is Stablecoin Really Necessary for Cross-border Payments?

marsbit9 min fa

Ethereum Finally 'Bounces Back'! ETH Returns to the Golden Line, What's Different About This Rally?

Ethereum has surged above $2,300, a level not seen in over three months, marking a significant recovery and technical breakthrough by reclaiming key resistance levels, including the weekly EMA50 for the first time in the current bear market. The rally has been fueled by a combination of factors: improved market risk appetite, positive regulatory sentiment, and a major short squeeze where over 88% of recent ETH liquidations were short positions. The ETH/BTC ratio has also broken its long-term downtrend, indicating renewed strength for Ethereum relative to Bitcoin. Fundamentally, Ethereum spot ETFs have shown strong inflows, outperforming their Bitcoin counterparts in recent months. Wall Street institutions like Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan have notably increased their ETH exposure, while several banks have added or expanded positions in ETH ETFs. On-chain fundamentals remain robust, with the proportion of staked ETH reaching a new all-time high of nearly 33.7%. Data indicates long-term holding sentiment, as small wallet holdings increased while large outflows were often directed towards staking or contracts, not selling. However, potential headwinds include declining staking yields and community debate over proposals to adjust staking rewards at high participation levels. The upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade, featuring improvements to validator exit efficiency, could enhance liquidity and further attract institutional stakers. While the rebound is supported by sentiment, capital flows, and fundamentals, its sustainability hinges on continued positive developments.

marsbit9 min fa

Ethereum Finally 'Bounces Back'! ETH Returns to the Golden Line, What's Different About This Rally?

marsbit9 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare GAS

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di GAS (GAS) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente GASGAS.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva GAS (GAS)Dopo aver acquistato GAS (GAS), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia GAS (GAS)Scambia facilmente GAS (GAS) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

321 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare GAS

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di GAS GAS sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片