Polymarket Dilarang Di Indonesia Di Tengah Peningkatan Penindasan Global

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-05-26Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-26

Introduzione

Di tengah upaya global memberantas perjudian online dan pasar prediksi, Indonesia telah memblokir akses ke platform pasar prediksi Polymarket. Langkah ini diambil setelah taruhan terkait masa jabatan Presiden Prabowo Subianto menarik perhatian luas di media sosial. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika menegaskan bahwa platform yang memfasilitasi taruhan uang nyata atas hasil suatu peristiwa dianggap sebagai perjudian, terlepas dari penggunaan teknologi blockchain atau aset kripto. Pemerintah Indonesia menyatakan tidak akan mentolerir bentuk perjudian online apa pun dan akan memblokir layanan serupa yang dicurigai memfasilitasi praktik perjudian online. Larangan ini sejalan dengan tekanan regulasi global yang meningkat terhadap Polymarket. Beberapa yurisdiksi seperti Taiwan, Thailand, Tiongkok, India, Singapura, Kolombia, Argentina, dan Brasil telah menerapkan pembatasan atau pemblokiran serupa. Di AS, platform ini juga sedang diselidiki oleh anggota Kongres terkait dugaan perdagangan orang dalam dan menghadapi tindakan penegakan hukum di tingkat negara bagian. Otoritas Indonesia mengimbau masyarakat untuk tidak mengakses atau terlibat dalam aktivitas spekulasi berbasis taruhan digital karena melanggar hukum dan berisiko menyebabkan kerugian finansial.

Di tengah penindasan global terhadap perjudian daring dan pasar prediksi, Indonesia telah bergabung dengan daftar yurisdiksi yang memberlakukan pembatasan terhadap Polymarket dan platform sejenis setelah taruhan mengenai masa jabatan Presiden menarik perhatian daring.

Indonesia Blokir Akses Ke Polymarket

Indonesia baru-baru ini memblokir akses ke platform pasar prediksi Polymarket setelah taruhan yang banyak dibagikan mengenai berakhirnya prematur kepresidenan Prabowo Subianto mendapatkan daya tarik di media sosial pekan lalu.

Dalam pernyataan resmi, Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika mengumumkan larangan tersebut, menegaskan bahwa langkah ini bertujuan untuk melindungi masyarakat, khususnya generasi muda dan pengguna ruang digital.

Direktur Jenderal Pengawasan Ruang Digital Alexander Sabar menegaskan bahwa platform yang memfasilitasi taruhan uang asli pada hasil peristiwa dianggap sebagai perjudian, bahkan ketika dibingkai sebagai "pasar prediksi" dan menggunakan teknologi blockchain atau aset kripto.

"Pemerintah tidak akan mentolerir segala bentuk perjudian daring di Indonesia. Kegiatan seperti Polymarket melibatkan taruhan moneter dan spekulasi pada peristiwa dengan hasil yang tidak pasti, yang melanggar hukum Indonesia yang berlaku," tegas Alex.

Oleh karena itu, otoritas akan memblokir akses ke layanan pasar prediksi lain yang diduga "memfasilitasi praktik perjudian daring". Selain itu, pemerintah melacak akun media sosial yang berafiliasi dengan atau mempromosikan Polymarket untuk memastikan larangan tersebut ditegakkan di platform lain.

Kementerian juga mendesak masyarakat untuk tidak mengakses atau terlibat dalam aktivitas spekulasi berbasis taruhan digital, termasuk yang menggunakan kripto, karena aktivitas ini dapat melanggar hukum Indonesia dan menyebabkan kerugian finansial bagi pengguna.

Tekanan Regulasi Global Meningkat

Otoritas Indonesia mencatat bahwa keputusan mereka untuk membatasi akses ke Polymarket sejalan dengan kerangka hukum global lainnya. Seperti yang dinyatakan dalam pengumuman tersebut, beberapa yurisdiksi lain juga telah menerapkan tindakan terhadap Polymarket dan platform pasar prediksi lainnya, dengan alasan bahwa platform-platform tersebut menyerupai praktik perjudian daring.

Selama dua tahun terakhir, Taiwan, Thailand, China, dan India telah memberlakukan pembatasan terhadap Polymarket sesuai hukum lokal masing-masing, sementara Singapura, Kolombia, dan India secara resmi telah memblokir platform tersebut.

Pada bulan Maret, otoritas Argentina memerintahkan pemblokiran nasional terhadap Polymarket setelah platform tersebut memprediksi data inflasi. Seperti dilaporkan Bitcoinist, pengadilan di Buenos Aires mengarahkan penyedia layanan internet, Google, dan Apple untuk memblokir akses ke platform tersebut, dengan alasan bahwa platform tersebut beroperasi sebagai platform perjudian daring tanpa izin.

Sementara itu, bank sentral Brasil mengumumkan larangan terhadap pasar prediksi dan platform taruhan pada bulan Maret, termasuk Polymarket dan Kalshi. Otoritas menegaskan bahwa platform-platform tersebut gagal mematuhi peraturan lokal tentang perdagangan derivatif dan menimbulkan kekhawatiran mengenai perlindungan investor serta integritas pasar.

Pasar prediksi juga menghadapi pengawasan di AS, dengan pembuat kebijakan dan otoritas tingkat Negara bagian memberikan tekanan pada sektor ini. Pekan lalu, anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat James Comer meluncurkan penyelidikan formal terhadap Polymarket dan Kalshi menyusul serangkaian perdagangan mencurigakan yang terkait dengan operasi militer AS rahasia dan peristiwa geopolitik penting.

Anggota parlemen tersebut mengumumkan bahwa dia telah mengirim surat kepada CEO kedua perusahaan tersebut untuk mencari informasi tentang bagaimana platform mereka mendeteksi dan mencegah perdagangan orang dalam. Dia juga meminta rincian tentang bagaimana mereka memverifikasi identitas pengguna dan menegakkan larangan bagi pengguna dari yurisdiksi terbatas. Pada hari yang sama, dua raksasa pasar prediksi tersebut gagal dalam upaya mereka untuk menghentikan tindakan penegakan hukum terkait perjudian terhadap mereka di Nevada dan Washington.

Kapitalisasi pasar kripto total berada di $2,56 triliun dalam grafik satu minggu. Sumber: TOTAL di TradingView

Domande pertinenti

QMengapa Indonesia memblokir akses ke platform Polymarket?

AIndonesia memblokir akses ke Polymarket karena platform tersebut dianggap sebagai bentuk perjudian online yang melanggar hukum. Pemicunya adalah taruhan yang viral di media sosial mengenai kemungkinan berakhirnya masa kepresidenan Prabowo Subianto sebelum waktunya. Pemerintah, melalui Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika, menyatakan langkah ini untuk melindungi masyarakat, terutama generasi muda, dari aktivitas spekulasi berbahaya yang dapat menyebabkan kerugian finansial.

QApa pendapat pemerintah Indonesia tentang 'prediction market' atau pasar prediksi?

APemerintah Indonesia, melalui Direktur Jenderal Pengawasan Ruang Digital Alexander Sabar, menyatakan bahwa platform yang memfasilitasi taruhan uang asli atas hasil suatu peristiwa, meskipun dikemas sebagai 'pasar prediksi' dan menggunakan teknologi blockchain atau aset kripto, tetaplah dianggap sebagai perjudian. Aktivitas semacam ini melanggar hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia dan tidak akan ditoleransi.

QNegara-negara mana saja selain Indonesia yang telah membatasi atau memblokir Polymarket?

ASelain Indonesia, sejumlah yurisdiksi lain juga telah mengambil tindakan terhadap Polymarket. Taiwan, Thailand, China, dan India telah memberlakukan pembatasan berdasarkan hukum setempat. Sementara itu, Singapura, Kolombia, dan India secara resmi telah memblokir platform tersebut. Argentina dan Brasil juga baru-baru ini mengeluarkan perintah pemblokiran nasional terhadap Polymarket dan platform sejenis.

QApa yang terjadi dengan Polymarket dan Kalshi di Amerika Serikat?

ADi Amerika Serikat, Polymarket dan Kalshi sedang menghadapi tekanan regulator dan penyelidikan. Anggota DPR James Comer meluncurkan penyelidikan formal terhadap kedua perusahaan tersebut menyusul serangkaian perdagangan mencurigakan yang terkait dengan operasi militer rahasia AS dan peristiwa geopolitik penting. Comer meminta informasi kepada CEO kedua perusahaan tentang pencegahan perdagangan orang dalam dan verifikasi identitas pengguna. Pada hari yang sama, upaya hukum kedua raksasa pasar prediksi ini untuk menghentikan tindakan penegakan hukum terkait perjudian di Nevada dan Washington ditolak.

QApa alasan Brasil melarang platform pasar prediksi seperti Polymarket?

ABank sentral Brasil melarang platform pasar prediksi dan taruhan, termasuk Polymarket dan Kalshi, dengan alasan bahwa platform-platform tersebut gagal mematuhi peraturan lokal tentang perdagangan derivatif. Otoritas Brasil juga menyoroti kekhawatiran mengenai perlindungan investor dan integritas pasar, yang menjadi dasar pengambilan keputusan pelarangan tersebut.

Letture associate

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit6 min fa

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit6 min fa

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit16 min fa

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit16 min fa

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit26 min fa

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit26 min fa

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit40 min fa

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit40 min fa

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

On June 12th, SpaceX debuted on the Nasdaq, reaching a valuation that briefly touched $2 trillion. This marked the culmination of a 24-year journey from its founding in 2002, driven by Elon Musk's frustration at the high cost of buying rockets. The company's path was defined by early failures, with its first three Falcon 1 launches ending in explosions before a successful 2008 flight opened the era of commercial spaceflight. Key to its model was a fixed-price NASA contract, incentivizing cost reduction. SpaceX mastered rocket reusability, first achieving a Falcon 9 landing in 2015, which drastically cut launch costs. This enabled its profitable Starlink satellite internet constellation, envisioned years before reusability was proven, to create an internal market for frequent launches. Similarly, the next-generation Starship rocket was in development long before its first flight, with its business case evolving from Mars colonization to supporting the emerging concept of in-orbit data centers for AI—a story now central to its valuation. The company's recent IPO, a reversal of its long-standing "no IPO" stance, is funding this ambitious "space-based compute" vision. While major tech players like Google, Blue Origin, and others are investing heavily, significant technical and cost hurdles remain. Ultimately, SpaceX's history is one of creating its own demand: first with Starlink and now with space-based AI compute, betting that its next rocket will enable its next giant market.

marsbit42 min fa

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

marsbit42 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare BAN

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Comedian (BAN) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente ComedianBAN.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Comedian (BAN)Dopo aver acquistato Comedian (BAN), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Comedian (BAN)Scambia facilmente Comedian (BAN) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

506 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare BAN

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di BAN BAN sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片