鲲 KUN 与 Pharos Network 达成战略合作,共推 RealFi、RWA 及跨境支付基建创新

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-20

Introduzione

近日,香港的Layer 1基础设施Pharos Network与数字支付专家鲲KUN签署战略合作协议,将结合Pharos的机构级区块链与鲲KUN的全球合规支付网络,共同推动供应链信贷资产的代币化,并利用区块链实现更高效的全球结算。 当前,新兴市场的中小企业在跨境贸易中常面临收款周期长、资金周转压力大的困境。此次合作旨在通过合规且可扩展的方式,将供应链金融与B2B跨境支付引入链上,破解企业流动性难题。 双方合作初期将聚焦:供应链信贷资产代币化以释放流动性;利用区块链进行原生数字资产结算,降低摩擦;探索企业级虚拟卡方案;并为大宗商品、B2B电商、Web3及AI等垂直场景提供链上金融服务。 Pharos Network CEO Wish Wu表示,鲲KUN的持牌支付网络与Pharos构建RealFi结算层的愿景高度契合。鲲KUN CEO Dr. Louis Liu指出,双方桥接支付轨道与区块链底层,能将链上资产高效转化为实体经济所需的流动性,并计划未来引入AI技术优化全球资金流。 Pharos主网已上线,生态内有超50个dApp运行。此次合作将强化其作为RealFi基础设施的地位。Pharos由蚂蚁集团前团队成员创立,并获得多家知名机构投资,目前正推出孵化计划招募生态建设者。鲲KUN则是一家拥有全球牌照的科技集团,专注于为各类跨境贸易与科技场景提供数字支付与嵌入式金融服务。

近日,香港。面向 RealFi 打造的 Layer 1 基础设施 Pharos Network 与可信的行业数字支付专家 鲲 KUN 宣布正式签署战略合作协议(MoU)。双方将通过 Pharos 的机构级区块链底座与 鲲 KUN 的全球合规持牌支付基础设施深度耦合,共同推动供应链信贷资产的代币化,并基于区块链轨道实现更高效的全球结算。

行业背景:破解出海企业的流动性困局

目前,全球范围内尤其是新兴市场的中小型企业出海企业面临着严峻的营运资金挑战。受限于传统贸易金融体系的繁琐流程、成本高昂以及服务分散,供应商在交付货物后通常需等待 30 至 90 天才能收到款项,这种流动性压力限制了企业的业务扩张。尽管 RWA(现实世界资产)代币化已成为行业热点,但目前市场多聚焦于被动型金融产品,较少有项目能有效的将底层基建与真实的商业活动、持牌支付分发网络相连接。

解决方案:持牌支付轨道与 RealFi 基建的深度整合

Pharos Network 与 鲲 KUN 的合作旨在弥合这一鸿沟,以合规且可扩展的方式将供应链信贷与B2B 跨境支付带入链上。双方初期的战略重点将涵盖:

  • 供应链信贷资产代币化:释放资产流动性,优化企业资金周转效率;
  • 数字资产的原生链上结算:利用区块链轨道降低跨链结算摩擦;
  • 企业级虚拟卡方案:探索更灵活的企业资金使用场景;
  • 场景化链上金融服务:为大宗商品、一般贸易、B2B 跨境电商、服务贸易、Web3 生态及 AI 应用等垂直场景提供合规的链上金融服务。

Pharos Network 联合创始人兼 CEO Wish Wu 表示: “鲲 KUN 构建了一个备受信任且具备全球持牌资质的支付网络,深度服务于新兴市场。他们在跨境数字支付领域的专业积淀,与 Pharos 打造 RealFi 包容性结算层的愿景完美契合。我们将携手以合规、可触达的方式,将供应链资产与跨境资金流带入链上。”

鲲 KUN 创始人兼 CEO Dr. Louis Liu 表示: “结算确定性是 RealFi 的最后一公里。通过将 鲲 KUN 的合规支付轨道与 Pharos 的高性能底层架构进行桥接,我们能够协助企业将链上资产高效转化为实体经济所需的切实流动性,并在此过程中交付机构级的可信度。未来,我们也将探索利用 AI 驱动的智能化编排来进一步优化全球商业资金流,提升新兴市场的结算效率。”

目前,Pharos 主网已正式上线,生态内已有超过 50 个 dApp 活跃运行。此次与 鲲 KUN 的合作,将通过链接持牌支付系统与链上金融市场,进一步巩固 Pharos 作为 RealFi 基础设施的行业地位。

关于 Pharos Network

Pharos Network 是专为真实金融设计的 Layer 1 基础设施,旨在实现链上资产与机构级资产的无缝流通 。Pharos 采用模块化架构与深度并行执行技术,结合内置合规模块,致力于构建全球金融的新一代基础设施 。Pharos 由来自蚂蚁集团的顶尖团队打造,并获得来自住友商事子公司、 Hack VC、Faction VC 等全球知名投资机构的支持 。

Pharos 推出高达 1,000 万美元 「Native to Pharos」 建设者孵化计划,目前正面向全球招募专注于 RWA、DeFi 及预测市场等前沿领域的早期团队和专注 Pharos 生态的建设者和开发者。入选者将获得来自 Pharos 方面的技术指导、AI 开发者工具及生态资源支持,以及来自 Hack VC、Draper Dragon、 Lightspeed Faction 以及 Centrifuge 等机构级伙伴的支持。

关于 鲲 KUN

鲲 KUN 是以数字支付及嵌入式金融服务为核心的创新型科技集团,立足全球布局的牌照及合规风控体系,链接亚洲与非洲、拉美、中东等新兴市场。集团定位于可信的行业数字支付专家,业务涵盖跨境数字支付、链上金融、企业发卡及 AI 智能体支付四大业务板块,结合人工智能和区块链技术的深度应用,为大宗商品,一般贸易,B2B 跨境电商,服务贸易,Web3 生态,AI 应用等业务场景提供安全、合规、高效的一站式数字支付与交易服务,构建赋能企业全球化业务发展的动力引擎。

Domande pertinenti

QPharos Network 与 鲲 KUN 达成战略合作的主要目标是什么?

APharos Network 与 鲲 KUN 达成战略合作的主要目标是通过将 Pharos 的机构级区块链底座与 鲲 KUN 的全球合规持牌支付基础设施进行深度整合,共同推动供应链信贷资产的代币化,并基于区块链轨道实现更高效的全球结算,以解决新兴市场中小企业的流动性困局。

Q文章中提到,目前RWA代币化市场的普遍局限性是什么?

A目前,RWA(现实世界资产)代币化市场多聚焦于被动型金融产品,较少有项目能有效地将底层基建与真实的商业活动、持牌支付分发网络相连接。

QPharos Network 和 鲲 KUN 的初期战略合作重点涵盖哪些方面?

A双方初期的战略合作重点涵盖:1. 供应链信贷资产代币化;2. 数字资产的原生链上结算;3. 企业级虚拟卡方案;4. 为大宗商品、一般贸易、B2B跨境电商、服务贸易、Web3生态及AI应用等垂直场景提供场景化链上金融服务。

Q鲲 KUN 创始人 Louis Liu 认为什么是实现 RealFi 的关键要素?

A鲲 KUN 创始人 Louis Liu 认为,结算确定性是 RealFi 的最后一公里,是实现 RealFi 的关键要素。通过将合规支付轨道与高性能底层架构桥接,可以将链上资产高效转化为实体经济所需的流动性,并交付机构级的可信度。

QPharos Network 正在开展的「Native to Pharos」建设者孵化计划面向哪些团队和开发者?

APharos Network 的「Native to Pharos」建设者孵化计划目前正面向全球招募专注于 RWA、DeFi 及预测市场等前沿领域的早期团队,以及专注 Pharos 生态的建设者和开发者。

Letture associate

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

**Tau Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine for the Post-Moore Era** For 60 years, progress in semiconductors was driven by Moore's Law – making transistors smaller, denser, and cheaper. This path has now stalled due to plummeting returns below 7nm, astronomical lithography costs, and rising per-transistor expenses. After six years and testing 381 production chips, Huawei’s semiconductor team proposes a fundamental shift: **stop competing on size, start competing on time**. This is the core of their "τ (Tau) Scaling" theory. It treats *time* as the key optimization metric, compressing characteristic delays (τ) across all levels – from transistor switching (picoseconds) to data center tasks (seconds), spanning 12 orders of magnitude. **What is τ Scaling?** It holistically minimizes delay/time constants (τ) across four layers: transistors (switching speed), circuits (signal delay), chips (compute/memory access), and systems (end-to-end communication). The goal is to align optimization from process and circuit design to architecture and systems using this unified metric. **Mobile Application: LogicFolding** Without advancing the process node, this technique vertically stacks chips using ultra-precision hybrid bonding, distributing critical paths across layers ("stacking floors"). Results include a 55% transistor density increase, 41% better energy efficiency, over 40% higher SRAM frequency, and a roadmap targeting 4GHz by 2029. **AI Data Center Application: Full-Link Latency Compression** With 80% of AI cluster energy and 70% cost spent on data movement, the focus is slashing communication time. Key innovations include: 1. **Unified Bus:** Cuts multi-layer protocols, reducing remote access latency from microseconds to ~100 nanoseconds – 500x faster. 2. **Hi-ONE Optical Interconnect:** Replaces copper with fiber, enabling 8Tb/s per module and scaling distances from 1m to 100m for 10,000-chip clusters. 3. **3D Folding:** Solves the "interface bottleneck" of 2.5D packaging by vertically integrating memory, power, and optical I/O alongside compute, predicting over 100x integration density gain by 2035. **Re-fusion of Logic and Memory** The AI era, where data movement is more critical than computation, demands tight 3D integration of logic and memory, shifting industry influence towards memory and advanced packaging. **Remaining Challenges** include adapting EDA tools for 3D design, optimizing wafer-to-wafer process variation and vertical interconnect losses, and establishing new energy efficiency and benchmarking standards. **Conclusion:** The era of scaling physical dimensions is over. The era of scaling time has begun. By leveraging 3D stacking, system architecture, and interconnect optimization—rather than solely chasing advanced lithography—performance and efficiency can continue to advance. This is poised to be the semiconductor industry's core roadmap for the next decade.

marsbit39 min fa

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

marsbit39 min fa

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

**Summary: The Fundamental Flaws of NodeStrategy, the 'First Ordinals DAT'** NodeStrategy presents itself as the first Ordinals Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) on Bitcoin. Its model mirrors MicroStrategy's treasury narrative but for NFTs, specifically targeting the NodeMonkes collection (not officially affiliated). The project's core mechanism is a four-step flywheel: a 10% fee on all trades (90% to treasury, 10% to radFi/Bound marketplace) is used to buy NodeMonkes. These NFTs are then listed for sale on Satflow, with 100% of the sale proceeds used to buy back and burn the project's token, NODESTRAT, aiming to create a perpetual value cycle. However, the design contains critical, self-defeating flaws: 1. **Platform Lock-In:** As a Bitcoin Rune, NODESTRAT lacks smart contract functionality and cannot natively enforce the 10% fee. The fee can only be collected on the radFi/Bound marketplace itself. This makes the entire flywheel dependent on a single platform. If liquidity moves elsewhere, fee revenue drops to zero, halting the mechanism. 2. **Self-Suffocating Economics:** The 10% fee acts both as the flywheel's fuel and a major drag on demand. A buy/sell roundtrip incurs a 20% cost, creating a massive hurdle for traders. This strangles the very trading volume needed to generate fees. 3. **Ineffective Value Support:** The flywheel is starved. Low daily volume (~$9K) generates minimal fees for NFT purchases. The NFT "ladder" sales are slow and unpredictable (only 39 total sold), meaning buybacks are infrequent. While 30.77% of the supply has been burned, this supply reduction cannot lift price without corresponding demand, which is suppressed by the high transaction tax. 4. **Meaningless NAV:** The Net Asset Value (NAV), currently at a 0.46x discount to market cap, is merely a marketing figure. There is no redemption mechanism for token holders to claim the underlying NodeMonkes assets. Price is set by market liquidity flows, not by this theoretical backing. In essence, NodeStrategy's design forces its revenue source (trading fees) to simultaneously cripple the demand and liquidity required for its own success, trapping the project in a stagnant state.

marsbit46 min fa

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

marsbit46 min fa

Agentic Design Patterns: A Book That Made Me Re-Understand "What Is an Agent, Really?"

"Agentic Design Patterns" is a 2025 book by Antonio Gullí, a Google engineering director, which offers a systematic framework for AI Agent development through 21 design patterns. A core contribution is the "Four Levels of Agency": Level 0 (bare LLMs) are not true agents. Level 1 agents actively decide when and how to use tools. Level 2 agents engage in strategic planning, context engineering (curating and filtering information), and self-reflection. Level 3 involves multi-agent collaboration with defined communication topologies. The book introduces **Context Engineering** as a superset of prompt engineering, managing four layers of information for the agent: system prompts, external data, implicit context (user history, environment), and feedback loops for automated optimization. A key pattern is **Reflection (Producer-Critic)**, where two distinct agents with different prompts collaborate iteratively—one produces output, the other critiques it—until quality is satisfactory or a max iteration limit is reached. For **Memory**, a three-layer model is proposed: Session (ephemeral conversation context), State (temporary task data), and Memory (persistent, long-term storage). Regarding **Multi-Agent Systems**, the book advises against unnecessary complexity, recommending simple topologies like Supervisor or Peer-to-Peer based on task needs. It emphasizes perfecting a single Level 2 agent before moving to multi-agent setups. The author concludes with three actionable takeaways: 1) Add a Critic agent to existing workflows, 2) Practice Context Engineering beyond simple prompts, and 3) Avoid premature multi-agent complexity; first master a robust single agent. The book provides a practical map, codifying common challenges like reflection, memory, and coordination into reusable patterns, saving developers from reinventing foundational solutions.

链捕手1 h fa

Agentic Design Patterns: A Book That Made Me Re-Understand "What Is an Agent, Really?"

链捕手1 h fa

An AI Read SpaceX's Prospectus and Wrote This Investment Memo in 12 Minutes

An AI agent autonomously analyzed SpaceX's 226MB S-1 filing, purchased real-time market data on-chain for $1.87, and generated a comprehensive investment memo in 12 minutes. The memo concludes a "Hold" recommendation. Bull Thesis: SpaceX holds a near-monopoly in commercial launch (80% of global orbital mass since 2023), operates the profitable Starlink business (10.3M subscribers, $7.2B adj. EBITDA), and is vertically integrated from rockets to AI via the xAI acquisition. Starlink alone is a standout, high-margin business. Bear Thesis: The AI division is a massive cash burn ($6.4B operating loss on $3.2B revenue in 2025). True debt obligations approach ~$42B, not the headline $29B, due to bridge loans and X-related debt. Significant contingent liabilities exist, including a potential $10B fee from a Cursor option agreement. The company faces concentrated counterparty risk (e.g., a $45B Anthropic contract), slowing revenue growth, and complex governance as a controlled company with four share classes. Valuation anchors Starlink's standalone value at ~$84B (applying Iridium's 7.4x sales multiple), suggesting the current ~$500B+ IPO target prices in immense future execution risk for Starship and AI. Key risks include Starship delays, accelerating AI losses, and underwriter conflicts (the IPO's lead banks are also lenders on the $20B bridge loan it aims to refinance). Investment triggers: upgrade to "Overweight" if priced ≤$350B and Starship meets milestones; downgrade to "Pass" if priced >$510B or key risks materialize.

marsbit1 h fa

An AI Read SpaceX's Prospectus and Wrote This Investment Memo in 12 Minutes

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare LAYER

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Solayer (LAYER) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente SolayerLAYER.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Solayer (LAYER)Dopo aver acquistato Solayer (LAYER), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Solayer (LAYER)Scambia facilmente Solayer (LAYER) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

283 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.02.11Aggiornato il 2025.03.21

Come comprare LAYER

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di LAYER LAYER sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片