Odaily Interviews Aster: DEX Will Ultimately Devour the Entire Trading World, Optional Privacy is the Key Ladder

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2026-03-31Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-31

Introduzione

Odaily Interview with Aster: DEX Will Ultimately Devour the Trading World, Optional Privacy is the Key Ladder Aster has initiated key steps to build institutional-grade private DeFi infrastructure, marked by the launch of its Layer 1 mainnet, Aster Chain, on March 17. The mainnet offers traders fair ordering and optional privacy. This was followed by the launch of its native staking function on March 20. The project has rapidly evolved from an innovative Perp DEX into a complete infrastructure layer, achieving record-breaking trading volumes in late 2025 and a successful TGE. In an interview, CEO Leonard explained their core logic: launching a mainnet *after* securing users and revenue, not with a "cold start." This ensures every step is validated by real market demand. Aster's key differentiator is its unique "optional privacy" value proposition, implemented through a ZK + Stealth Address architecture. This allows for automatic privacy for each transaction while maintaining verifiability. The team believes this feature is a prerequisite for mass adoption and will be a primary driver for institutional use of DEXs, forming the core of their moat. Looking ahead, Aster predicts the DEX landscape will evolve into an oligopoly dominated by a few major players. The project is actively pursuing partnerships with both Web2 and Web3 entities, with significant interest from financial firms looking to build markets or list assets on its chain. For the immediate future, Aster's Q2 fo...

Recently, Aster marked its first anniversary as a new starting point, initiating key steps to build institutional-grade privacy DeFi infrastructure. On March 17, the Aster Chain mainnet officially launched, dedicated to providing traders with fair sequencing and optional privacy trading experiences. Shortly after, on March 20, Aster Chain's native staking feature went live, deeply binding network security with ecosystem growth through a dual reward mechanism.

From repeatedly breaking trading volume records in the second half of 2025, to successfully completing the brand upgrade and TGE, to the current L1 mainnet launch, Aster is rapidly evolving from an innovative Perp DEX into a more complete infrastructure layer.

However, in the current context of L1 oversaturation, cold market sentiment, major macro changes, and severely fragmented attention, is launching an L1 the best timing? What are the differentiated advantages of Aster Chain? And what are the upcoming roadmap plans?

To answer these questions, Odaily Planet Daily specially interviewed Aster CEO Leonard, delving into its key decisions over the past year, insights into industry challenges, and the long-term vision of building "trusted Infrastructure".

I found that the core logic lies in: "First have users and revenue, then launch the mainnet," rather than a "cold start." This ensures that every step Aster takes is grounded in real demand and market validation. Simultaneously, Aster Chain's unique "optional privacy" value proposition will be the source of its moat.

There is much in Aster's story worth pondering for Web3 entrepreneurs. Below, the story will be told in the first person by Aster CEO Leonard, enjoy~

What Did Aster Do Right in the Past Year?

Starting in the second half of 2025, the platform's 24h trading volume kept breaking records, from $1 billion in June to reaching $11 billion in September, feeling the project's rapid development. Also in September, during Aster's TGE, achievements like a 24h trading volume breakthrough of $345 million, 330,000 new wallet addresses, and platform TVL exceeding $1 billion solidified Aster's position in the DEX market. When trading volumes broke records, it made us realize that we entered the right track at the right time.

Alongside the TGE, the brand also successfully transitioned from APX to Aster.

And when we launched the L1 mainnet with truly "optional privacy" functionality, it was a unique product unavailable on the market and a prerequisite for on-chain trading moving towards mass adoption.

How Did We Get Through the Darkest Times?

When we initially underwent the rebranding, the market was almost monopolized by Hyperliquid, and no one thought anyone could challenge their position. For a long time before our TGE, the general public thought this was impossible. Before the Aster TGE, the estimated FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) wasn't high, but we ultimately received a valuation far exceeding expectations, which also triggered a re-evaluation of Perp DEX (Perpetual Contract Decentralized Exchange) projects by the market.

In fact, we once postponed the TGE plan because we felt there was room for product improvement before the official launch. However, we later decided to choose "execution speed" over "pursuing perfection". Looking back, this was the right decision.

The lesson learned is: In an emerging market like Perp DEX, there is no so-called "standard playbook" for handling the toughest problems. Most consensus advice only applies to normal conditions. There's no magic here, only believing in what you do and working hard.

And the core belief that can lead the team to "embrace hardship" is: DEX will ultimately devour the entire trading world, and "optional privacy" is the key to achieving this process.

Behind the High-Speed Growth, Which Team Growth Experiences Can Be Reused?

As the project scaled, we proactively moved away from the early decision-making model reliant on intuition, instead deeply relying on data. Aster's current organizational structure is more refined, decision-making is more systematic, and team metrics are clearer to achieve quantifiable, trackable growth.

Although the organization is growing, some underlying logic remains constant: the owner consciousness of all members, taking full responsibility for the final outcome; rejecting hesitation, action first; result-oriented, processes must ultimately translate into substantive value for users and the protocol.

To maintain the early team's execution and judgment, we adopted three major strategies: Extreme flatness, rejecting internal friction, minimizing management layers as much as possible, reducing ineffective communication links, ensuring transparent and symmetric information; Decision delegation, full authorization: Give teams clear KPIs and Ownership, delegate decision-making power to those closest to the action; Land first, perfect later, emphasizing "quick delivery, small steps fast running", letting the market provide first-hand correction feedback, completing iteration and optimization in a real environment.

The Hardest Time for a New L1? How Does Aster Chain Define Itself?

First, let's talk about the differentiated technical design. Aster Chain adopts a ZK + Stealth Address architecture: Stealth Address makes every transaction automatically private, ZKproof makes every private transaction verifiable. (Friends interested in the technical details of how Aster Chain balances on-chain fund transparency and transaction privacy, please refer to the Gitbook.)

For developers, we launched Aster Code, which is an ecosystem for fee sharing. The core benefit is allowing developers to build their own trading interfaces and directly automate revenue generation from them.

Furthermore, Aster Code also improves developers' integration efficiency, provides a transparent and controlled authorization mechanism, and supports data monitoring and instant settlement.

The Real Challenge of L1: After the Mainnet Launch, How to Make Developers and Users Stay?

The L1 battle is a competition for liquidity.

Technical solutions are basic requirements; users should not feel the difference between centralized and decentralized architectures when trading. Users of Aster Perp DEX are inherently users of Aster Chain. We had users, even revenue, before launching the mainnet. This is the model for successful projects in this cycle, not building a chain first and then looking for a business model.

Regarding ecosystem growth, I believe the privacy option will drive substantive adoption of decentralized trading by institutions, which has always been a past obstacle. Now that we provide privacy features, institutions will at least start trying to move part of their trading flow on-chain. The reasoning is sound: they want diversification, and many institutions already believe the future of trading lies in DEXs. They just needed a viable solution. And now, that solution has emerged: Aster Chain.

What Will the Future Industry Landscape Be? And What is Aster's Moat?

Privacy and core trading experience are our core. In the liquidity competition track, network effects mean capital will inevitably concentrate towards the top players. I believe it's highly likely that an "oligopoly"格局 dominated by the top three players will form in the future; for DEXs, this concentration could be even higher.

Because for DEXs, geographical region or market segment limitations barely exist. Competitive differentiation mainly comes from different design principles and philosophies. Just like Aster always focuses on privacy and is willing to make necessary trade-offs for this core value, this反而 constitutes our moat, allowing us to survive in the long-term competition.

When Contacting B-end, What Point Most Impresses Potential Partners?

Aster Chain is actively promoting cooperation in both Web2 and Web3 fields.

Web3 companies have huge potential for product collaboration with us. For example, we are talking with other stablecoin projects, exploring cooperation models similar to the World Liberty Financial architecture. Additionally, we are also focusing on prediction markets because there is high overlap between prediction market users and perp DEX traders, and the cross-selling opportunities are obvious.

On the Web2 side, most conversations focus on financial companies. The most common point of interest is: building markets on Aster or getting assets listed. This type of cooperation is the easiest阶段性 goal for them to achieve. Although the cycle for establishing cooperation with large companies, especially regulated financial institutions, is long, once confirmed, we will announce it publicly.

What Should We Do Now? Backcasting Based on Judgments About the Future

After the mainnet launch, Aster's Q2 priorities include:

  • Attracting users, professional traders, and institutional traders with privacy needs;
  • Increasing asset types and liquidity;
  • Expanding the ecosystem through Aster Code and Aster Chain;
  • Strengthening token utility and governance;
  • Optimizing the trading interface (UI/UX)......

Crypto Market Downturn, External AI Hype, Any Rhythm Adjustments or Countermeasures from Aster?

Aster cannot predict the market, can only focus on building, surviving the winter and continuously creating value is the only certain path to the next ATH.

As for the AI trend, Aster has already provided relevant skill interfaces for AI Agents. Although not AI experts, we can empower AI developers and Agents, allowing them to build tools on Aster and provide us feedback on how to optimize the product, making Aster not only human-friendly but also attractive to AI Agents.

Years later, I hope the industry's evaluation of Aster is: infrastructure that users can trust long-term and can carry funds and strategies.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the core belief driving Aster's vision for the future of trading?

AThe core belief is that DEX will eventually consume the entire trading world, and 'optional privacy' is the key enabler to achieve this vision.

QWhat was Aster's strategy for launching its L1 mainnet, and why was it considered successful?

AAster adopted a 'users and revenue first, then launch the mainnet' approach instead of a 'cold start.' This ensured each step was validated by real market demand and user needs, making the launch successful.

QHow does Aster Chain achieve a balance between on-chain transparency and transaction privacy?

AAster Chain uses a ZK + Stealth Address architecture: Stealth Address ensures each transaction is private, while ZK-proofs make every private transaction verifiable, maintaining transparency and privacy.

QWhat is Aster Code, and how does it benefit developers on the Aster Chain ecosystem?

AAster Code is a fee-sharing ecosystem that allows developers to build their own trading interfaces and automatically earn revenue from it. It also improves integration efficiency with transparent authorization mechanisms and real-time settlement.

QWhat does Aster identify as its main competitive advantage or 'moat' in the DEX landscape?

AAster's moat is its focus on privacy and core trading experience. By prioritizing optional privacy and making necessary trade-offs, it creates a defensible position in the long-term competitive DEX market.

Letture associate

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit51 min fa

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit51 min fa

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit51 min fa

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit51 min fa

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit1 h fa

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit1 h fa

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手1 h fa

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ASTER

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Aster (ASTER) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente AsterASTER.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Aster (ASTER)Dopo aver acquistato Aster (ASTER), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Aster (ASTER)Scambia facilmente Aster (ASTER) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

668 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.09.25Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare ASTER

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ASTER ASTER sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片