Ethena struggles as revenue falls 32% – Can demand save ENA at $0.089?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-28

Introduzione

Ethena's (ENA) financial performance weakened significantly in Q1 2026, with its price dropping to $0.089. Key metrics show a 32% decline in Gross Protocol Revenue to $65.06 million, attributed to reduced minting activity and staking rewards. Total Value Locked (TVL) also fell by approximately $130 million since March, indicating sustained capital outflows and declining user activity, which hit a low of around 1,200 daily active users. Despite a slight improvement in gross profit, it remains substantially lower than previous quarters. However, spot market data shows consistent accumulation, with $3.41 million in net inflows over three days, suggesting investor demand may provide some price support. Without a recovery in core fundamentals, significant upside potential remains limited.

Ethena’s [ENA] price now appears to be aligning with its weakening financial performance. Over the past 24 hours, the asset has recorded a double-digit decline, dropping to $0.089 at press time.

While the numbers reflect mounting pressure, a broader evaluation of market conditions is necessary to determine whether this decline marks the start of a deeper correction or a temporary adjustment.

Ethena’s momentum weakens across key metrics

On-chain data shows that ENA has underperformed across multiple fronts since the start of Q1 2026, particularly when compared to its performance in the previous two quarters.

A key area of concern is revenue efficiency. Gross Protocol Revenue fell to $65.06 million, down from $96.15 million in Q4 2025, representing a 32% decline. The drop becomes even more pronounced when compared to Q3 2025.

This contraction points to weaker minting activity and reduced staking rewards, both of which suggest declining on-chain participation.

Source: DeFiLlama

In a market that has remained relatively stable compared to the October–December 2025 cycle, this underperformance raises concerns about weakening user demand rather than external pressure.

Liquidity conditions reinforce this trend. Total Value Locked (TVL), a core indicator of protocol health and user commitment, has continued to decline steadily.

Since the start of March 2026, TVL has fallen by approximately $130 million, bringing it to around $6.66 billion at the time of writing. Within the last 24 hours alone, roughly $16 million has been unstaked, signaling sustained capital exit from the protocol.

Can profit alone sustain user interest?

Despite the broader slowdown, Ethena has recorded a slight improvement in gross profitability.

In Q1 2026, the protocol has generated $614,190 in gross profit, compared to $463,200 in Q4 2025. While this reflects a marginal increase, it does little to offset the sharp decline from earlier performance levels.

For context, Q3 2025 saw $10.18 million in gross profit, roughly 16.5 times higher than current figures. This gap highlights a structural decline in earning potential, even as short-term profitability shows minor improvement.

The implication is clear, as modest profit growth alone may not be sufficient to retain users, especially in a competitive DeFi environment where capital quickly rotates toward higher-yield opportunities.

User activity data supports this view. According to Artemis, Daily Active Users have dropped to around 1,200, the lowest level recorded since December.

Spot demand offers a counter-signal

Despite weakening fundamentals and declining liquidity, spot market activity presents a more resilient picture. Exchange netflow data indicates that buying pressure has increased recently. Over the past 24 hours, net inflows into spot positions reached approximately $303,000.

More notably, this is not an isolated event. Over the past three days, cumulative purchases have climbed to around $3.41 million, suggesting consistent accumulation.

Source: CoinGlass

Such a sustained demand indicates that investors continue to absorb sell-side pressure, even as capital exits the protocol layer.

If this accumulation trend holds, it could limit further downside and support price stabilization. However, without a recovery in core fundamentals, particularly user activity and revenue generation, any upside may remain constrained within a narrow range.


Final Summary

  • Ethena’s protocol performance deteriorated in Q1 2026, even as broader market conditions remained relatively stable.
  • Spot investors continue to accumulate, despite rising liquidity outflows and declining TVL.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the current price of ENA and how much has it declined in the last 24 hours?

AThe current price of ENA is $0.089, and it has recorded a double-digit decline over the past 24 hours.

QBy what percentage did Ethena's Gross Protocol Revenue fall in Q1 2026 compared to Q4 2025?

AEthena's Gross Protocol Revenue fell by 32%, dropping from $96.15 million in Q4 2025 to $65.06 million in Q1 2026.

QWhat does the decline in Total Value Locked (TVL) and the unstaking of funds indicate about the Ethena protocol?

AThe decline in TVL, including $16 million unstaked in 24 hours, signals sustained capital exit from the protocol, indicating weakening user commitment and health.

QDespite the broader slowdown, which financial metric showed a marginal improvement for Ethena in Q1 2026?

AGross profitability showed a marginal improvement, increasing to $614,190 in Q1 2026 from $463,200 in Q4 2025.

QWhat counter-signal does spot market activity provide against the weakening fundamentals?

ASpot market activity shows increased buying pressure, with net inflows of $303,000 in 24 hours and cumulative purchases of $3.41 million over three days, suggesting consistent accumulation by investors.

Letture associate

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit9 min fa

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit9 min fa

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit19 min fa

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit19 min fa

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit29 min fa

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit29 min fa

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit43 min fa

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit43 min fa

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

On June 12th, SpaceX debuted on the Nasdaq, reaching a valuation that briefly touched $2 trillion. This marked the culmination of a 24-year journey from its founding in 2002, driven by Elon Musk's frustration at the high cost of buying rockets. The company's path was defined by early failures, with its first three Falcon 1 launches ending in explosions before a successful 2008 flight opened the era of commercial spaceflight. Key to its model was a fixed-price NASA contract, incentivizing cost reduction. SpaceX mastered rocket reusability, first achieving a Falcon 9 landing in 2015, which drastically cut launch costs. This enabled its profitable Starlink satellite internet constellation, envisioned years before reusability was proven, to create an internal market for frequent launches. Similarly, the next-generation Starship rocket was in development long before its first flight, with its business case evolving from Mars colonization to supporting the emerging concept of in-orbit data centers for AI—a story now central to its valuation. The company's recent IPO, a reversal of its long-standing "no IPO" stance, is funding this ambitious "space-based compute" vision. While major tech players like Google, Blue Origin, and others are investing heavily, significant technical and cost hurdles remain. Ultimately, SpaceX's history is one of creating its own demand: first with Starlink and now with space-based AI compute, betting that its next rocket will enable its next giant market.

marsbit46 min fa

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

marsbit46 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ENA

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Ethena (ENA) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente EthenaENA.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Ethena (ENA)Dopo aver acquistato Ethena (ENA), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Ethena (ENA)Scambia facilmente Ethena (ENA) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

231 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare ENA

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ENA ENA sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片