Aster Chain mainnet debuts: Can it slow the DEX’s falling market share?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-18Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-18

Introduzione

Aster Chain, a perpetual DEX backed by YZi Labs, has launched its mainnet. The new Layer 1 blockchain incorporates zero-knowledge proofs and stealth addresses to prevent "position hunting" and improve privacy for high-frequency traders, while maintaining a CEX-like user experience. Despite a strong initial debut in late 2025, Aster's trading volume and market share have significantly declined. Weekly volume dropped from a peak of $74 billion to under $10 billion, and its market share fell from 40% to 20%. Competitor Hyperliquid, which initially lost dominance to Aster, has since regained much of its market share. The native token, ASTER, fell 86% from its high but recovered 80% during a broader market bounce. The mainnet announcement caused a brief 10% price surge, but gains were not sustained. The token remains range-bound between $0.70 and $0.80, with a potential move to $0.95 if key resistance is broken. Future demand may depend on the success of planned staking features.

YZi Labs-backed perpetual DEX platform Aster has finally unveiled its Aster Chain mainnet. The new chain will adopt zero-knowledge proofs and stealth addresses in a bid to curb ‘position hunting,’ common on transparent public chains and platforms like Hyperliquid.

Initially, the DEX debuted on BNB Chain via a bridge and later extended to Ethereum [ETH], Solana [SOL], and Arbitrum [ARB] as a multi-chain dApp. While it will still support trading across these chains, it will transition into a sovereign Layer 1 ecosystem.

The move is aimed at achieving the privacy and other optimal features for high-frequency traders while maintaining a CEX-like user experience.

Aster’s market share falls

Although the DEX became an instant hit after its launch last September, the traction has waned significantly in 2026.

During its peak activity in October 2025, it handled nearly $74 billion in weekly trading volume. But its trading activity shrank to less than $10 billion as of mid-March 2026, following the broader crypto rout in the past few months.

Its overall market share in perps trading volume declined by half, from 40% to 20%, over the same period.

Source: Dune

Interestingly, Aster’s wild FOMO after launch clawed down Hyperliquid’s [HYPE] market share. Hyperliquid had over 60% dominance before Aster went live. Afterward, its dominance fell to 27% but began reclaiming it only after unveiling trading support for oil, gold, silver, and other commodities via HIP-3.

As of writing, Hyperliquid has regained most of its trading volume, while Aster’s steep decline has not abated.

ASTER price reaction

Likewise, its native token ASTER slumped 86% after a free fall from $3 to a low of $0.4. However, the broader market relief bounce from early February has boosted the altcoin’s recovery by 80%.

But the mainnet debut didn’t help bulls that much. After the update, ASTER swiftly rallied by nearly 10%, hitting $0.790, but had erased most of the gains at the time of writing.

When zoomed out, the altcoin was still stuck at its February tight price range of $0.70 and $0.80. The sideways structure may extend if there is no meaningful catalyst for a broader market extended recovery.

However, should the $0.80 price level be flipped to support, then retesting $0.950 could be feasible. It’s unclear whether the planned staking feature will induce demand for ASTER.

Source: ASTER/USDT, TradingView

Final Summary

  • Aster has unveiled its Aster Chain mainnet to double down on privacy and trading efficiency.
  • Still, the DEX’s traction remains in a downtrend while the ASTER price has been stuck in a tight range.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main purpose of the newly launched Aster Chain mainnet?

AThe Aster Chain mainnet aims to provide enhanced privacy and optimal features for high-frequency traders by adopting zero-knowledge proofs and stealth addresses to curb position hunting, while maintaining a CEX-like user experience.

QHow did Aster's market share in perpetual trading volume change from its peak to mid-March 2026?

AAster's market share in perpetual trading volume declined by half, from 40% at its peak to 20% by mid-March 2026.

QWhat was the impact of Aster's launch on Hyperliquid's market dominance?

AAster's launch reduced Hyperliquid's market dominance from over 60% to 27%, though Hyperliquid later regained most of its trading volume after introducing support for commodities like oil, gold, and silver via HIP-3.

QHow did the ASTER token price react to the mainnet debut?

AThe ASTER token initially rallied nearly 10% to $0.790 after the mainnet debut but erased most of those gains shortly after, remaining stuck in the $0.70 to $0.80 range.

QWhat chains did Aster initially support before transitioning to a sovereign Layer 1 ecosystem?

AAster initially debuted on BNB Chain via a bridge and later extended to Ethereum, Solana, and Arbitrum as a multi-chain dApp before transitioning to a sovereign Layer 1 ecosystem.

Letture associate

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit51 min fa

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit51 min fa

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit51 min fa

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit51 min fa

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit1 h fa

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit1 h fa

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手1 h fa

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ASTER

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Aster (ASTER) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente AsterASTER.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Aster (ASTER)Dopo aver acquistato Aster (ASTER), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Aster (ASTER)Scambia facilmente Aster (ASTER) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

668 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.09.25Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare ASTER

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ASTER ASTER sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片