未来5天是抢反弹最佳的时间窗口

币市操盘手Pubblicato 2022-08-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-08-09

Introduzione

随着FIL、DOT等滞胀币种全面补涨,存量市场的交易拥挤度达到了阶段性的顶点,加之ETH、XRP等主流币逐渐反弹至前期重压区,获利回吐盘的不断增加使得市场逐渐陷入调整。

Btc

NEWS

随着FIL、DOT等滞胀币种全面补涨,存量市场的交易拥挤度达到了阶段性的顶点,加之ETH、XRP等主流币逐渐反弹至前期重压区,获利回吐盘的不断增加使得市场逐渐陷入调整。但从走势上看,调整依然以非常温和的方式展开,例如,在过去下跌的几天里,大饼成交量始终维持在地量水平,实体阴线也比前两轮调整要小的多,这意味着短期内,虽然多头上攻的意愿较低,但是空头的砸盘动能也非常有限。那么这种焦灼的状态还会持续多久?

在存量格局下,市场的每一次上涨都是以消耗存量流动性为代价,涨幅度越大意味着对存量的消耗越严重。所以,在7月28大涨之后,市场开始遭遇明显的资金流出压力,最直观的现象就是USDT溢价率从-0.54%快速下降至-1.68%。然而,只要存量加仓还未到达极限,短期流动性透支所引发的调整通常都较为温和,对中长期趋势也没有太大的影响。

从宏观上来看,近期,除了以原油为代表的大宗商品价格大幅回落外,全球海运价格和主要港口货物吞吐量也大幅下降,供应链压力逐渐缓解,华尔街投行普遍预计美国通胀或将在7、8月份回落。而在美国通胀回落的预期没有兑现之前,美股和加密市场的反弹行情依然会延续。所以,笔者认为,在美国7月份CPI公布之前,我们对反弹行情依然可以保持乐观。但不得不强调的是,市场能有多大的反弹空间主要取决通胀回落的斜率。因为只有回落的斜率足够大,9月份美联储削减加息的预期才越强烈。

由于大量的币种均反弹至前期套牢密集区附近,市场再次进入多空激烈争夺的变盘的窗口,这也是近期行情焦灼的原因所在。从盘面上来看,最快变盘的权重币种可能是ETH,因为ETH当前的震荡区间距离前期套牢密集区1800-2000已经非常接近。ETH能否向上突破也很大程度上反映了多头继续上攻的决心。相比涨幅已经翻倍的ETH,大饼的涨幅仍处于明显落后的状态,币价与前期套牢密集区29000-31000仍有较大的距离。对于那些对安全边际要较高要求的投资者而言,配置大饼也不失为防止踏空的最佳选择。

从过往的经验来看,每一次紧缩周期到来,首当其冲的总是流动性差的资产。自美联储5月份加快加息步伐以来,NFT市场正在快速土崩瓦解。公开数据显示,以太坊7月链上NFT销售额约为5亿美金,创12个月新低。Solana7月的销售额不足6000万美元,创历史新低。Avalanche、Polygon等其他新兴公链7月销售额均低于500万美元。在交易量方面,占据NFT交易市场90%以上份额的头号霸主Opensea7月交易量约5.28亿美元,较1月份下降了90%。在市场流动性枯竭的情况下,NFT持有者将面临的一个尴尬问题:持有的NFT空有账面价值,却始终无法出手。当然,再糟糕的领域也有好的项目,例如无聊猿BAYC在大跌的过程中,反而吸引了大量的抄底资金,交易量逆势放大。然而,坚挺的始终就是一两个头部项目,99%的项目实际已经走在归零的路上。

在熊市的环境下,头部的项目往往都会获得估值提升的机会,而价值的重估主要来自基本面的改善。首先,熊市会加剧行业竞争的马太效应,导致头部项目的市场占有率比进一步提升,这在剩者为王的DeFi领域尤为明显。例如,在过去半年里,Uniswap在DEX领域的现货交易占比已经从62%上升到75%,其部分ETH交易对的深度甚至超过了所有的中心化交易所。而MakerDao、Aave、Compound三大借贷巨头的市场份额也从5月的76%上升到7月的87%。

其次,熊市往往迫使增长面临天花板的老项目进行内部改革和寻找新的业务增长点。例如,Uniswap在同质化代币交易市场接近饱和后,便开始拓展NFT交易市场,并在近期完成对NFT聚合市场Genie的收购。Aave则加入了去中心化超额抵押稳定币领域的竞争,试图借助去中心化稳定币继续扩张业务版图。

当前,DeFi蓝筹整体仍处于基本面边际改善的周期,未来不排除这些项目仍有老树开新花的机会。对于追求价格弹性的投资者而言,配置一部分DeFi蓝筹也是获得超额收益较好的策略之一。

在操作上,由于市场对美国通胀回落逐渐形成预期,8月10日之前的反弹行情依然可以继续乐观。如果8月10日公布的结果为,通胀回落的斜率不大,且核心通胀依然比较坚硬,那么市场可能会迎来阶段性的震荡。总之,未来五天的策略依然还是持币待涨。

Letture associate

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

"Glue Finance founder argues Ethereum's current price underperformance stems from its 'unfinished machine' status. Despite record usage and settlement value in 2026, ETH remains below its 2021 peak because the protocol's continued development creates a dependency on the Ethereum Foundation for guidance and fixes. Key issues include centralized L2 sequencers, governance-based freezes (as seen with Arbitrum), state bloat, a vulnerable public mempool, and looming quantum computing threats. This 'dependency discount' prevents ETH from accruing the 'ossification premium' that markets award to immutable, trustless systems like Bitcoin. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed escape paths: a 'war mode' shift towards centralization for speed (which would sacrifice Ethereum's core value), or simply replacing the EF with another governing body. The only solution is the 'Manhattan Plan' or 'Lean Ethereum': a concerted, accelerated effort to complete and then *freeze* the protocol's neutral core. This involves finalizing critical upgrades in consensus (Lean Consensus), scaling (targeting 1 trillion gas/sec), quantum resistance (leanXMSS signatures), and full ZK-provable execution. The goal is to pass the 'walk-away test'—where Ethereum could run forever, neutrally, without the EF. Success would transform Ethereum into the first programmable, quantum-resistant, immutable global settlement layer, flipping its current discount into a unique 'eternity premium' that surpasses Bitcoin's. Failure—stagnation or trading neutrality for speed—would relegate it to being a slower, less trustworthy competitor."

marsbit14 min fa

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

marsbit14 min fa

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

Glue Finance founder argues that Ethereum's current price underperformance, despite high on-chain activity, stems from its incomplete state and lingering dependency on central stewards like the Ethereum Foundation. The core thesis is that the market is discounting ETH not for lack of use, but because the protocol remains a "machine under construction." Key unresolved issues include centralized L2 sequencers with limited escape hatches, state bloat, vulnerable public mempools, and the looming quantum computing threat. This perpetual "work-in-progress" status forces reliance on a small group of maintainers, undermining the network's promise of credible neutrality and immutability. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed paths: a "wartime mode" of centralizing for speed (surrendering Ethereum's unique value) or merely replacing the Foundation with another governing entity. The only solution is to complete and then "freeze" the protocol's neutral core through a focused "Manhattan Project" dubbed "Lean Ethereum." This project aims to bundle critical upgrades—consensus layer overhaul, massive scaling via ZK-proofs, quantum resistance, and statelessness—into a decisive push to finalize the base layer. Once the core rules are cryptographically solidified and beyond anyone's control (passing the "walk-away test"), Ethereum would shed its dependency discount and earn a "rigidity premium" for its credible neutrality and programmability, potentially surpassing Bitcoin's valuation. The race is between completing this hardening and the risks of protocol capture or stagnation.

链捕手15 min fa

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

链捕手15 min fa

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbit1 h fa

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbit1 h fa

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit1 h fa

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片