Axie Infinity peut-il prolonger sa hausse de 15 % malgré l'activité croissante du réseau AXS ?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-09

Introduzione

L'activité sur le réseau Axie Infinity (AXS) a connu une expansion rapide, avec le nombre d'adresses actives ayant presque doublé en 24 heures. Cette hausse soudaine, portée principalement par les gros détenteurs (portefeuilles détenant entre 10 000 et 100 000 AXS), suggère une accumulation plutôt qu'une spéculation à court terme. La concentration de l'activité parmi ces acteurs majeurs indique une confiance accrue dans les niveaux de prix actuels. Au moment de la rédaction, le prix de l'AXS avait déjà enregistré une hausse de plus de 15%. La combinaison de l'augmentation des adresses actives, de la domination des gros porteurs et d'une forte activité commerciale laisse présager une poursuite de la tendance haussière. Un bref repli ou une consolidation ne remettrait pas nécessairement en cause cette dynamique, d'autant plus que l'indicateur Stochastic RSI vient de rebondir depuis une zone de survente. Les signaux on-chain semblent indiquer une intention solide, qui précède souvent une extension de la tendance.

Le nombre d'adresses actives sur le réseau Axie Infinity [AXS] a presque doublé au cours des dernières 24 heures.

La flambée de l'activité de trading, combinée à la concentration de l'offre entre les mains des gros détenteurs, pourrait-elle garantir qu'AXS maintienne son élan haussier ?

Les adresses actives en forte hausse

L'activité du réseau Axie Infinity s'est rapidement développée en peu de temps. Selon les récentes données d'activité de trading de Santiment, le nombre d'adresses actives sur le réseau a presque doublé par rapport au jour précédent.

Il ne s'agit pas d'une augmentation graduelle mais d'un pic soudain. Dans la plupart des cas, de tels mouvements ont tendance à signaler une participation renouvelée. Soit les traders d'AXS reviennent, soit les gros joueurs se repositionnent pour un mouvement plus important.

Source : Santiment

Les gros joueurs prennent le contrôle

Malgré la hausse des adresses actives, la distribution de l'offre joue un rôle crucial. Dans le cas d'AXS, la majeure partie de l'activité récente provient de gros détenteurs, les portefeuilles contenant entre 10 000 et 100 000 AXS dominant le volume des échanges.

Cela dit, une continuation haussière explosive plus importante est plus que probable. Habituellement, lorsque les gros joueurs stimulent la croissance des adresses, cela signale une accumulation plutôt qu'une spéculation. Ces participants ont tendance à agir avec intention, et ils poursuivent rarement le bruit à court terme.

La domination des gros joueurs suggère une confiance accrue dans les niveaux de prix actuels d'AXS.

La hausse peut-elle se poursuivre ?

Au moment de la rédaction, les prix d'AXS ont gagné plus de 15 %, mais des replis à court terme restent possibles.

Cependant, la combinaison de l'explosion des adresses actives, de la domination des gros détenteurs et d'une forte activité de trading indique une continuation de la tendance haussière.

Si les gros joueurs continuent de diriger l'activité du réseau, l'élan pourrait se poursuivre. Une brève consolidation n'affaiblirait pas nécessairement la tendance. D'autant plus que le RSI stochastique du token vient de rebondir depuis une zone de survente.

Pour l'instant, Axie Infinity semble soutenu par plus que le simple mouvement des prix. Les signaux on-chain suggèrent une intention. Et l'intention précède souvent l'extension.

Réflexions finales

Les adresses actives d'AXS ont presque doublé en 24 heures.
Les gros détenteurs ont dominé l'activité du marché alors que les prix d'AXS affichaient une hausse quotidienne de 15 %.

Crypto di tendenza

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

Domande pertinenti

QQu'est-ce qui a presque doublé sur le réseau Axie Infinity au cours des dernières 24 heures ?

ALe nombre d'adresses actives sur le réseau Axie Infinity a presque doublé au cours des dernières 24 heures.

QQuel type de portefeuilles a dominé le volume d'échanges récent d'AXS ?

ALes portefeuilles contenant entre 10 000 et 100 000 AXS ont dominé le volume d'échanges récent.

QDe combien le prix d'AXS a-t-il augmenté au moment de la rédaction de l'article ?

AAu moment de la rédaction de l'article, le prix d'AXS avait gagné plus de 15%.

QQue suggère la domination des grands détenteurs sur le marché d'AXS ?

ALa domination des grands détenteurs suggère une confiance accrue dans les niveaux de prix actuels d'AXS et signale une accumulation plutôt qu'une spéculation.

QQuel indicateur technique vient de rebondir après une zone de survente ?

ALe Stochastic RSI du jeton vient de rebondir après une zone de survente.

Letture associate

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

**Title: Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: "Smart Money" Stumbles on the Pitch as "Buying No" Outperforms "Buying Yes"** An analysis of pre-match trades over $5,000 on Polymarket for 20 completed group stage matches reveals a counterintuitive finding: large "smart money" bets were not consistently accurate. Aggregated pre-match buying volume was $89.55 million, with a weighted hit rate of only 48.5%. Holding these positions would have resulted in an estimated net loss of about $1.76 million (ROI -2.0%), challenging the notion that big money reliably predicts outcomes. The data highlights several key dynamics. Draws proved to be a major risk, significantly impacting bets on favored teams, as seen in Belgium-Egypt and Spain-Cape Verde. Markets were more efficient for clear mismatches (e.g., Germany's big win) but became prone to bias when favorites were overvalued. Notably, buying "No" shares (betting against a specific outcome) significantly outperformed buying "Yes," with hit rates of 62.4% vs. 37.5%. This suggests the market often overprices popular narratives, creating value in contrarian positions. Individual trades showed extreme volatility. One wallet (mintblade) earned an estimated $6.77 million by betting against Iran, while another (LEEEROYJENKINS) lost roughly $8.39 million on a Belgium win. The market favors high-risk, high-reward information trading rather than steady arbitrage. For sustained insight, wallets with consistent performance across multiple matches (e.g., swisstony) are more telling than one-off big bets. Ultimately, the Polymarket acts less as a crystal ball and more as a mirror, reflecting crowd bias and the inherent unpredictability of football. True "smart money" may lie not in predicting the future, but in identifying and exploiting market mispricings while respecting risk.

marsbit6 min fa

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

marsbit6 min fa

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

Jeff Bezos Returns as CEO for Third Venture, Still Can't Avoid Musk After stepping down as Amazon CEO in 2021, Jeff Bezos has returned to the front lines as co-CEO of Prometheus, an AI startup he founded. In a recent CNBC interview, Bezos described the experience as "Type 2 fun"—exhausting but ultimately rewarding. Founded less than a year ago, Prometheus has already raised over $18 billion in two funding rounds, achieving a staggering $41 billion valuation. Prometheus aims to develop a "General Engineer AI" to accelerate the entire "invention loop"—design, simulation, testing, and manufacturing—for complex physical products like jet engines, spacecraft, and medical devices. This positions the company at the intersection of Bezos's past experiences: Amazon's platform-building scale and Blue Origin's rigorous physical engineering. This marks Bezos's third major venture, following Amazon and Blue Origin. His co-CEO is Vik Bajaj, bringing expertise from life sciences and hard tech. Bezos now dedicates most of his time to Prometheus, signaling his belief in its transformative potential. The move also comes as Bezos's space company, Blue Origin, faces challenges, including a recent test explosion delaying its New Glenn rocket. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO, surpassing Amazon's market cap. While Musk focuses on AI for executing physical tasks (like Tesla's robots and SpaceX's engineering), Bezos is betting on AI to *invent* in the physical world. Prometheus enters a crowded industrial AI field with players like OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Tesla's Optimus. Its lofty valuation bets on the unproven but massive opportunity to become the foundational platform for engineering in the AI era—a "blue ocean" Bezos hopes to define before Musk does.

marsbit9 min fa

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

marsbit9 min fa

Cursor's New 1.5T Model Abandons Kimi Foundation, $60 Billion Stock Swap for Cursor, Musk's First Move Targets Microsoft's GitHub

Cursor, a popular AI-powered coding tool, has been acquired by SpaceX in an all-stock deal valued at $60 billion. The announcement coincided with Cursor's unveiling of major new developments at the Compile conference: a new 1.5 trillion+ parameter AI model and a "GitHub for agents" platform called Origin. The upcoming model, trained from scratch on over 100,000 GPUs with 10-20x more computational power than before, marks a shift from Cursor's previous reliance on models like Kimi. Cursor's CEO, Michael Truell, emphasized the model will be a "generally intelligent" assistant, moving beyond just code generation to handle broader engineering tasks like planning, testing, and UI interaction. Simultaneously, Cursor introduced Origin, a "Git-native" code hosting platform designed for AI agents that perform thousands of operations daily, featuring automated conflict resolution for large-scale, AI-generated code changes. The acquisition by SpaceX provides Cursor with significant computational resources. Analysts suggest this combination—Cursor's expertise in reinforcement learning and SpaceX's computing power—could position them strongly in the AI race, potentially challenging established players like GitHub, Claude Code, and Codex.

marsbit12 min fa

Cursor's New 1.5T Model Abandons Kimi Foundation, $60 Billion Stock Swap for Cursor, Musk's First Move Targets Microsoft's GitHub

marsbit12 min fa

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

The article analyzes a popular theory circulating online that the U.S. stock market may be mathematically incapable of a true, sustained decline due to the country's massive and growing national debt. The argument suggests that the government's only path to managing this debt is through inflation and money printing, which would nominally lift asset prices like stocks, creating a perpetual "melt-up." The author places this idea within the historical context of market melt-ups, such as the dot-com bubble and Japan's asset bubble, where prices detach from fundamentals driven by momentum and FOMO. While acknowledging that a high-debt environment creates incentives for inflation, which is generally favorable for assets over cash, the article refutes key claims of the online theory. It clarifies that interest payments are not about to exceed GDP, that printing money is not the only option for the government, and that stocks do not reliably rise in lockstep with hyperinflation, citing historical examples from Germany, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela. The more probable outcome, according to the author, is a prolonged period of financial repression—moderate inflation above interest rates that slowly erodes debt and cash purchasing power, leading to nominally higher asset prices but potentially lower real returns. The core warning is that while long-term market trends may be upward, this does not eliminate the risk of significant interim crashes (30%, 40%, or more) or guarantee real wealth creation during inflationary times. The conclusion advises against betting one's entire financial future on a smooth, perpetually rising market narrative. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, diversified strategy involving productive assets (stocks, real estate, some gold, short-term bonds) and an adequate cash buffer to avoid forced selling during downturns. The key takeaway is to avoid extreme concentration in expensive assets and leverage, and not to base investment decisions on the hope that every market dip will inevitably be rescued.

marsbit29 min fa

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

marsbit29 min fa

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

The Fate of Digital Banks: A Flashy App is No Match for a Banking License The article argues that despite attracting billions of users with fee-free checking accounts and sleek apps, most "neobanks" struggle to be profitable because their core business—transaction fees—is inherently low-margin. The real profit engine of banking is lending (credit), which generates interest income. However, many early neobanks operated without their own banking licenses, which restricted their ability to lend at scale. Examples like Nubank, Revolut, and Chime illustrate the point. While they gained users with free accounts, their eventual profitability came from rolling out credit products. The piece highlights systemic risks for neobanks that rely on third-party infrastructure, citing the Synapse bankruptcy, which froze user funds and revealed the fragility of such models. The solution, according to the author, is obtaining a formal banking license, like the U.S. OCC's national trust charter. This provides regulatory backing, allows direct custody of funds, and eliminates dependency on intermediary partners. The trend is now evident in the crypto sector, where companies like Kraken, SoFi, and others are actively pursuing such licenses. The article concludes that while technology changes, the fundamental business logic of banking—profiting from lending—remains constant. Successful digital banks ultimately conform to this old model, just with better interfaces and fairer terms.

Foresight News37 min fa

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

Foresight News37 min fa

Trading

Spot

Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare AXS

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Axie Infinity (AXS) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Axie InfinityAXS.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Axie Infinity (AXS)Dopo aver acquistato Axie Infinity (AXS), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Axie Infinity (AXS)Scambia facilmente Axie Infinity (AXS) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

379 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di AXS AXS sono presentate come di seguito.