2026开局获利百万：「战神」Vida复盘BROCCOLI714事件交易全过程

比推Pubblicato 2026-01-01Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-01

Introduzione

2026年1月1日凌晨，程序交易员Vida通过监测BROCCOLI714异常行情，在黑客攻击事件中获利超百万美元。他提前持有20万美元现货与合约仓位，并设置价格异动警报。当监测到币安现货出现异常拉升（挂单量达2600万美元，远超该币市值）时，他判断为做市商账户被盗，立即平仓套利仓位获利30万美元，并在合约市场熔断机制间隙追加20万美元多头。随后趁黑客短暂撤单时抛售所有仓位，套现150万美元。最终在黑客彻底撤单后做空40万美元，于价格暴跌至0.02时平仓。Vida总结成功关键在于：设置价格警报、实时分析订单簿、与高手交流协作，并预判黑客终将被平台风控制裁。

Vida :00后,方程式新闻创始人,擅长程序交易,他曾分享在加密市场赚到千万美金的故事。

前情提要:北京时间2026年1月1日 01:23 AM,方程式新闻监测到:某做市商币安账户被高度怀疑遭到入侵,潜在攻击者疑似正在使用该账户约 1000 万至 2000 万美元资金,在币安现货市场集中拉高 BROCCOLI714-USDT 交易对价格。

以下为Vida全文:

《复盘在刚才的BROCCOLI714黑客事件中赚了100万美元》

前置条件以及基础设施:

- 我在0.016的成本有长期囤积一个BROCCOLI714的20万美元仓位,大概是今年11月初买的。现货+合约都有。买完之后就被套了,被套的都不敢去看。

- 之前10-11月份庄家操盘的风格是几小时里快速拉升然后一根大阴线立马出货,所以我给我的小币仓位都提前设置了一个1800秒内涨幅超过30%则吵醒我的提醒。

- 我还有一个开仓均价0.015左右的50万美元的BROCCOLI714USDT永续合约的币安合约资金费率套利仓位

当现货和合约的巨大价差发生时:我的短时间涨幅提醒程序和现货合约价差提醒程序都在疯狂的警报>让我开始全神贯注的跑到电脑面前开工。

我第一时间在带带的华语核心一个群里说了监测到这个情况:

- 我的第一反应是赶紧去平我的资费套利仓位。因为我原本50万U的套利对冲仓位变成了现货价值80万U,合约50万U。我立马平仓所有套利头寸就能落袋为安30万U。

– 但是我想想觉得非常反常,因为历史上不会有庄家这样不管价差暴力拉升现货。我去看了一眼orderbook深度,震惊的发生币安现货的bid 10%深度挂了500万U买盘,而合约的bid 10%只有5万U深度。有人说怀疑有人币安账户被盗,我也觉得这很合理。

– 又看了一眼币安主站上的订单簿,震惊的发现BROCCOLI714这个当时市值40m的币,bid挂了2600万U。由此推断一定是有人账户被盗了或者做市程序出bug,因为不会有庄家傻不拉几的这么做慈善,没有庄家会在现货市场上这么玩。

- 看到黑客在现货订单簿上有2600万U子弹后,我知道他的目的就是拉爆现货》抬合约》他在合约上离场。

所以我一个屏幕监测币安的orderbook变动,我知道只要黑客不在现货市场上撤$20m的买单,BROCCOLI714的价格就会不停抬升。

这时候我的第一反应是想去做多币安合约,但发现币安合约当时已经触发只减仓的“熔断保护机制”。

当时BROCCOLI现货已经是0.07,而币安合约被熔断机制控制在0.038,Bybit合约已经涨到0.055。所以我选择在我的交易终端上5-10秒尝试一次做多币安BROCCOLI714USDT永续合约,只要下单成功就等于熔断机制的时间过了,就等于币安合约会拉爆。

我成功蹲守到了这个机会并在0.046的合约入场成本又加仓了大概20万U多头头寸。

- 我知道这个事件必然是黑客或者做市商程序出bug引起,并且短时间涨幅太高,最终结局一定是鸡飞蛋打。

所以我一直盯着币安现货的订单簿看。

黑客中途撤销过一次订单簿,导致我以为他已经被币安风控部门给制裁了,所以我在中国时间2026-01-01 04:20:52.732开始用我的交易程序疯狂抛售》不计成本的卖出了我所有之前囤积+后来追多的BROCCOLI714现货和合约仓位。

我囤积的20万U原始仓位+后来追的20万U大概套现出150万U。(原始囤积仓位有很多是开在合约市场,导致我没有吃到那么多溢价)

在4:21被黑客撤销买盘的行为给吓跑之后,不讲武德的黑客过了大概1分钟又把买盘挂回来了,并且直接把价格拉到0.15。

但我知道他最终一定会被币安风控部门制裁。且一旦他账户被风控》bid撤了》broccoli就会崩盘,只是因为现在1.1所以工作人员比较懒所以暂时没被风控。

所以我一直紧盯orderbook

后来在4:31时,我发现黑客真的把bid都撤了。在4:32更是全撤掉了。并且这次等了很久也没重新挂回来 + 群友说应该是有人摇币安技术了,他大概率被制裁了。

所以我就开始做空操作。开了差不多40万U币安合约上的空头仓位,成本0.065左右。最终平仓价格大概是0.02

再复盘为什么我能抓住这个机会:

1.小币策略的价格异动警报
- 我对小币策略设置了短时间价格涨幅警报,只要持仓小币在短时间内出现超大幅度上涨,就会触发强制提醒,100% 能把我吵醒。 – 资金费率套利策略中,我也设置了监控:一旦检测到现货与合约之间出现巨大价差,就会触发强制提醒。

2. 识别反常价格行为并验证订单簿
当我看到明显反常的价格行为时,第一时间去看订单簿,判断“庄家”到底有多少子弹。结果发现:市值只有 3000 万美元的币,在币安现货 bid 端竟然挂了 2000 万 USDT。由此判断,这不可能是正常庄家操盘,而更像是黑客行为或做市商的系统 bug(没有庄家会这么不计成本、傻乎乎地猛拉现货)。

3. 还是要多和高手们交流。几个高手之间的头脑风暴,往往能在第一时间就搞清楚整个剧本的玩法。

4. 我很清楚第二段的玩法:
等黑客被币安风控部门制裁、撤掉 bid 单,然后蹲守这个机会做空。所以在第一段出货完成之后,我就一直盯着订单簿,等待这个机会出现。等了十几分钟真被我蹲守到了。

有一个行为让我猜到BROCCOLI714的黑客应该在收尾,因为他在中国时间4:28:15的时候还不计成本的买入了SOLUSDT的现货,大概拉升了5% >>> 又一次触发我提前设置的警报让我知道。

我猜测他当时已经部分账户被币安限制了不让在BROCCOLI714市场下新订单,所以狗急跳墙去买了SOL,

结果真的过了3分钟BROCCOLI价格就崩溃了

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

原文链接:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7599510

Domande pertinenti

QVida在BROCCOLI714事件中总共获利多少？

AVida在事件中总共获利约100万美元。他通过平仓套利头寸获利30万美元，通过抛售原始囤积仓位和追多仓位套现150万美元（其中包含本金），最后通过做空操作又获得额外收益。

QVida是如何第一时间发现BROCCOLI714价格异常波动的？

AVida为自己持有的小币种设置了价格异动警报程序，当BROCCOLI714在1800秒内涨幅超过30%时，程序会强制提醒并吵醒他。同时他的资金费率套利策略也设置了现货与合约价差监控，价差异常时也会触发警报。

QVida判断此次价格异常是黑客行为而非正常庄家操盘的依据是什么？

AVida发现市值仅3000万美元的BROCCOLI714，在币安现货买盘(bid)端竟然挂了2600万美元的买单，这种不计成本暴力拉升现货的行为不符合正常庄家操盘逻辑。正常庄家不会这样操作，因此判断可能是黑客入侵或做市商程序bug。

QVida在事件中采取了哪些具体交易操作？

A1. 第一时间平仓了50万美元的套利对冲仓位，获利30万美元；2. 在币安合约熔断机制解除后，在0.046价格加仓20万美元多头头寸；3. 在4:20开始抛售所有BROCCOLI714现货和合约仓位，套现150万美元；4. 在4:31黑客撤单后，以0.065成本开立40万美元空头仓位，在0.02价格平仓获利。

QVida如何预判黑客会被币安风控制裁？

AVida通过持续监控订单簿发现黑客中途撤单，结合群友信息推测币安风控部门可能已介入。当在4:28发现黑客不计成本买入SOLUSDT现货时，他判断黑客可能部分账户已被限制在BROCCOLI市场下单，这是收尾迹象，果然3分钟后价格就崩溃了。

Letture associate

BitGo Targets Nearly $2 Billion Valuation As It Prepares For IPO In The US

Crypto custody firm BitGo is targeting a valuation of up to $1.96 billion in its upcoming U.S. IPO, planning to raise $201 million by offering 11.8 million shares priced between $15 and $17. Despite a volatile market environment and recent selloffs, BitGo aims to leverage positive momentum in early 2026. The company, which secured a national trust charter from the OCC, has enlisted Goldman Sachs and Citigroup as lead managers for the offering. It plans to list on the NYSE under the ticker "BTGO," joining other major crypto firms entering public markets.

bitcoinist14 min fa

BitGo Targets Nearly $2 Billion Valuation As It Prepares For IPO In The US

bitcoinist14 min fa

Is the Crypto Market Doomed to Face Pressure in Q1? Progress of the CLARITY Act Becomes a Key Factor

The CLARITY Act, introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 29, 2025, aims to provide regulatory clarity for the digital asset market. It is currently stalled in the Senate after being received and referred to committee. Market participants are concerned that without significant progress in Q1, the bill faces increasing obstacles. Key reasons include the limited legislative window in the Senate from January to March, which is typically reserved for complex, non-urgent bills like CLARITY. If no substantive committee action occurs in January, the bill risks being sidelined by the legislative schedule. The Act is not a minor policy adjustment but a restructuring of regulatory authority, making it slow-moving, highly amendable, and prone to delays rather than outright rejection. If delayed until after the midterm elections, its prospects become even more uncertain due to potential shifts in Congressional power. Should Democrats gain influence post-election, the bill’s chances would likely decrease. Democratic leadership generally favors broader SEC authority, regulatory flexibility, and is hesitant to limit enforcement discretion—contrary to CLARITY’s goal of defining regulatory boundaries and reducing regulation by enforcement. In a Democrat-led Senate, the bill could be substantially rewritten, broken into smaller pieces, or indefinitely postponed. These factors explain the anxiety among U.S. crypto stakeholders and contribute to current market pessimism.

marsbit38 min fa

Is the Crypto Market Doomed to Face Pressure in Q1? Progress of the CLARITY Act Becomes a Key Factor

marsbit38 min fa

World Liberty expands into lending as WLFI faces selling pressure – Details

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a project linked to the Trump family, has expanded into crypto lending with the launch of its new platform, World Liberty Markets. Despite this strategic move and the growth of the crypto-collateralized lending sector, WLFI’s market performance remains under pressure. The token is consolidating around $0.16–$0.17, facing significant selling pressure and bearish momentum. Key indicators, including a positive netflow of $2.8 million and declining momentum readings, suggest continued downward risk. If selling persists, WLFI could fall to $0.15, though a successful product adoption could push it toward $0.20.

ambcrypto44 min fa

World Liberty expands into lending as WLFI faces selling pressure – Details

ambcrypto44 min fa

Fogo Countdown to Binance Spot Listing: Can FDV Reach $300 Million?

Fogo, a high-performance SVM Layer 1 blockchain, is set to launch its FOGO token on Binance Spot. The token was offered in a Pre-TGE Prime Sale on Binance Wallet on January 13, raising approximately $7 million by selling 200 million FOGO (2% of total supply) at $0.035 per token, implying a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $3.5 billion. Pre-TGE perpetual contracts are already trading at around $0.056, suggesting a potential 60% profit for sale participants. Market sentiment is optimistic, with a 93% probability that FDV will exceed $3 billion the day after listing. Fogo is designed for low-latency and high-throughput applications like trading and DeFi, featuring a 40ms block time. The project has raised $550 million in a seed round and $800 million in a community round. The total token supply is 10 billion FOGO, with 16.68% allocated to the community, 34% to core contributors, and significant portions to investors and the foundation. Most investor and team tokens are locked with a 12-month cliff followed by a 4-year vesting period.

marsbit1 h fa

Fogo Countdown to Binance Spot Listing: Can FDV Reach $300 Million?

marsbit1 h fa

Frequent Pokémon Card Heists: Is On-Chain Storage for Physical Collectibles a Risky Solution?

Rising global thefts and frauds targeting high-value Pokémon cards, such as armed robberies in Los Angeles and Hong Kong, highlight systemic risks in the physical collectibles market. As these items become increasingly financialized, traditional transaction methods—relying on in-person meetings, private trust, and community trades—are exposing participants to heightened personal and fraud risks. The market’s infrastructure has failed to keep pace with the liquidity and cross-regional nature of these assets. While local card shops are enhancing security measures, such as improved surveillance and formalized transaction processes, these efforts remain limited to specific locations and cannot scale globally. In response, some projects are exploring blockchain-based solutions to introduce verifiable ownership, custody, and transfer mechanisms. For instance, platforms like Renaiss on BNB Chain are developing specialized smart contracts that link physical cards to on-chain NFTs through certified custodians, binding asset status and location to enable secure, borderless trading. However, merely tokenizing cards without robust, transparent custody and verification does not address real-world risks. The evolution toward on-chain systems aims to provide a foundational layer of trust—enabling validation, reducing physical delivery risks, and clarifying accountability. Not every collector may adopt full blockchain integration, but the market grows increasingly dependent on such infrastructure to ensure safety, authentication, and liquidity as collectibles transition into high-stakes digital assets.

marsbit1 h fa

Frequent Pokémon Card Heists: Is On-Chain Storage for Physical Collectibles a Risky Solution?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures