美联储新主席带来狂暴大牛的可能性

深潮Pubblicato 2025-12-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-04

不出意外的话,凯文·哈塞特会是下一届美联储主席,特朗普的最爱。

撰文:Cookie,律动

在预测市场 Polymarket 上,哈塞特当选新一任美联储主席的概率已经上升至了 86%,远远领先其他可能的美联储新任主席人选。

不出意外的话,凯文·哈塞特(Kevin Hassett)会是下一届美联储主席,特朗普的最爱。

美联储的动作一直是影响加密货币市场的重要因素。那么,如果哈塞特最终如市场预期那般成为新一任美联储主席,预计会对市场造成哪些影响呢?

加速降息

哈塞特 11 月底的时候曾表示,此时暂停降息将是「非常糟糕的时机」,因为政府停摆已经拖累了第四季度的经济增长。他预计政府停摆将导致第四季度国内生产总值(GDP)下降 1.5 个百分点。与此同时,他指出 9 月份消费者价格指数(CPI)显示,通胀表现好于预期。

更早一些的时候,11 月 13 日,哈塞特表示,预计第四季度 GDP 将因政府停摆而下降 1.5%。看不到不降息的太多理由。

因此,若哈塞特成为新一任美联储主席,预计他将推动更快的利率下调,可能将联邦基金利率降至 3% 以下,甚至接近 1%,以刺激经济增长和就业。

这也是特朗普想看到的。

恢复 QE

12 月 1 日,美联储正式结束了量化紧缩(QT)政策,这标志着从 2022 年开始的资产负债表缩减过程的结束。尽管有观点认为,相关效果或将于明年年初才能显现,但流动性宽松预期已获得逐步实现。

哈塞特可能对通胀更宽容,将 2% 通胀目标视为灵活上限,而非严格锚定。重点放在就业和 GDP 增长上,减少对数据依赖的「渐进式」决策,转向更主动的亲增长干预。

今年 9 月,哈塞特在接受 Fox Business 采访时表示,美国正处于供给侧繁荣的时期,在没有真正通胀的经济体中,当前利率正阻碍经济增长和就业创造。同时他还表示,美国有望实现 4% 的 GDP 增长。

优先发展经济而非通膨控制的观点,让哈塞特执掌后的美联储重启 QE 是可以被期待的。

对比特币的影响

每一位美联储主席候选人,不论其是否直接谈论加密话题,都将对加密货币行业产生结构性影响,而哈塞特更与加密货币行业有着不容忽视的关联,他不仅曾公开持有价值百万美元的 Coinbase 股票,还担任过 Coinbase 的顾问委员会成员。

此外,他曾参与白宫内部关于数字资产政策的工作小组,推动在监管框架中为创新保留空间,并认为加密技术是影响未来经济结构的重要变量。他曾表示比特币将「改写金融规则」。

哈塞特的加密背景可能会减少监管不确定性,推动机构推动和美联储探索加密货币整合。这可以提升比特币的合法性和流动性,潜在推动价格至新高。

有不少交易员看好哈塞特上任后的行情,认为上任后才是牛市的开始,预计时间是明年年中,所以 26 年下半年是加密货币行业的重中之重。

Letture associate

Behind Robinhood's Launch of Its Own Chain, the Beautifully Packaged "Tokenized Stocks" Still Have No Equity Rights

Robinhood has launched "Robinhood Chain," an Ethereum-based Layer 2 built with Arbitrum technology, and introduced "Stock Tokens." This article clarifies that these tokens are not actual on-chain equity. They are tokenized debt securities issued by Robinhood Assets Jersey Limited, offering economic exposure to reference stocks or ETFs but lacking direct ownership, voting rights, or other shareholder privileges. The legal structure is conservative, relying on traditional financial intermediaries, custody, KYC/AML controls, and specific jurisdiction rules, even though the tokens are transferable on-chain. The move is part of Robinhood's broader strategy to evolve from a retail brokerage into a global financial ecosystem, integrating services like banking, retirement, crypto, and DeFi. Robinhood Chain aims to provide a programmable settlement layer, making financial products more portable and accessible while masking underlying complexity. However, the "brokerage chain paradox" lies in balancing a simple user interface with the intricate, regulated reality of the wrapped assets. The success of this model depends on users and regulators accepting this structured approach without misunderstanding the tokens as direct stock ownership. Key components supporting this strategy include the Bitstamp acquisition (expanding institutional crypto capabilities), the Robinhood Wallet (bridging brokerage and self-custody), the Robinhood Earn program (integrating DeFi lending), and the Lighter perpetual contracts platform. While ambitious, the initiative is still early, facing challenges in achieving liquidity, developer adoption, and regulatory clarity across jurisdictions.

marsbit42 min fa

Behind Robinhood's Launch of Its Own Chain, the Beautifully Packaged "Tokenized Stocks" Still Have No Equity Rights

marsbit42 min fa

Strategy's Accounting Gimmick: The Cap on BTC Sales Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion

The article, originally from Bankless, discusses how MicroStrategy's (MSTR) recent Bitcoin (BTC) sales reveal a much larger potential selling capacity than the widely reported $1.25 billion "reserve-building" cap. On July 7, MicroStrategy disclosed a sale of 3,588 BTC (~$216M) to pay dividends for its STRAT (STRC) preferred shares and replenish its USD Reserve. Crucially, the company stated this sale did not count against its stated $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." The analysis explains that MicroStrategy's "BTC Monetization Plan," part of its broader "Digital Credit Capital Framework," actually outlines three main purposes for selling BTC, only one of which has the $1.25B cap: 1. **Building the USD Reserve** (capped at $1.25B). 2. **Covering preferred share/ debt costs** (replenishing the reserve after payments). 3. **Funding buybacks** (up to $10B for preferred shares and $10B for MSTR common stock). The key nuance is the accounting distinction between "building" the reserve (selling BTC before making payments) and "replenishing" it (selling BTC after using reserve funds for payments). While functionally the same—converting BTC to cash for obligations—only "building" counts against the publicized $1.25B limit. This means sales for "replenishing" and the $20B+ buyback pool allow for total potential sales exceeding $30B. The article frames this as part of MicroStrategy's shift from a simple "buy and hold" Bitcoin narrative to an "active capital management" model, where BTC becomes a balance-sheet tool to manage pressures between its common stock, preferred shares, dollar reserve, and Bitcoin holdings. This creates complex trade-offs and potential conflicts of interest. The conclusion warns investors that the $1.25B figure is not a total sales ceiling. Understanding terms like "build," "replenish," and "repurchase" in MicroStrategy's disclosures is now critical, as the company navigates a new, more complex role as an actively managed entity rather than a passive Bitcoin accumulator.

Odaily星球日报58 min fa

Strategy's Accounting Gimmick: The Cap on BTC Sales Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion

Odaily星球日报58 min fa

The Networking Game in Silicon Valley's Elite Circles: Those with Connections Get $50 Million, While the Truly Talented Can't Raise Money?

"Silicon Valley's Meritocracy to Relationship Game: How Networks Now Trump Talent." The article argues that Silicon Valley has shifted from a meritocracy to a "kingmaker" system where connections and background outweigh true ability. Key factors driving this change include: 1. **AI-Distorted Expectations:** Unprecedented growth curves (e.g., Anthropic) have led VCs to seek only "sure things" or pattern-match against past successes. 2. **Capital Concentration:** LP funds are concentrated in a few large, multi-stage funds, pushing VCs to overpay for hot deals to secure capital. 3. **VC Professionalization:** The industry has become a standardized career path, attracting conformist "NPCs" rather than independent thinkers. The long IPO timeline incentivizes safe, consensus bets for career advancement over risky, fund-returning outliers. This consensus capital fuels consensus founders. Startups are now a standard career option, with accelerators pressuring uniform ideas (e.g., 81% AI). Founders from elite schools (Stanford, OpenAI) easily raise millions based on pedigree, not proof. Large funds preemptively back "centrally cast" teams with $10-50M war chests to dominate categories, sidelining outsiders. The "kingmaker" strategy has downstream effects: it encourages aggressive, sometimes fraudulent, revenue reporting and allows founders to sell significant secondary shares early, attracting grifters. The author predicts a mean reversion. History shows the hottest trends rarely produce the most valuable companies. They advocate backing underestimated outsiders with "a chip on their shoulder" over anointed insiders, believing true meritocracy will ultimately win. "Those chasing the herd are set up for slaughter."

marsbit1 h fa

The Networking Game in Silicon Valley's Elite Circles: Those with Connections Get $50 Million, While the Truly Talented Can't Raise Money?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片