为什么 HYPE 现在并不是一个好投资标的?

深潮Pubblicato 2025-11-30Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-01

回购一直是支撑 HYPE 价格的主要机制,然而,未来的代币解锁同样不容忽视。

撰文:Dave

摘要

HYPE 实施了强劲的回购机制(截至目前约 13 亿美元,约占 2025 年全部代币回购的 46 %),并且拥有稳健的收入支撑。相信几乎所有研究员对这个代币都是非常看好的,但是今天我要唱一个反调:若干结构性和宏观因素让 HYPE 成为一笔不那么「甜」的交易

1,回购 VS 解锁

回购一直是支撑 HYPE 价格的主要机制,许多 KOL 也提及这一点。然而,未来的代币解锁同样不容忽视。

从 2025‑11‑29 起,将解锁 3.73 亿 HYPE(约占总供应的 37 %),每日约 21.5 万 HYPE,解锁期为 24 个月。按当前价格计算,这将产生约 2 亿美元 / 月 的潜在供应压力

与此相比,2025 全年回购总额为 6.4464 亿美元,月均约 6550 万美元,回购资金来源于 97 % 的交易手续费。每日回购只能覆盖 25‑30 % 的每日解锁量。即使收入继续强劲增长,回购能力也难以吸收如此规模的解锁,必然导致价格压缩。

2,市场周期风险 & 估值脆弱性

当前几乎所有对 HYPE 的估值(包括广为引用的 P/E,其实是 ttm 的计算模式)都基于过去几个月的强劲数据, 牛市。但是作为经历过 2022 年熊市的韭菜,我认为宏观周期因素是必须纳入的关键变量。至少在可见的未来,熊市的概率并不低于牛市,核心假设和指标均受到挑战。

2.1 现状速览

当前收入指标表现确实很强劲:

  • ·年化收入:12 亿美元

  • ·全稀释估值(FDV):316 亿美元

  • ·流通供应:200 亿美元(数据来源:Defillama)

  • · TTM PE 约为 16.67

·2024‑12 至 2025‑08 月度复合收入增长为 +11.8 %

这些数据相较于大多数美股公司看似诱人,但问题也在这里——在即将到来的熊市中, HYPE 如同可能面临比其他项目更严重的戴维斯双杀情况

2.2 熊市情景与戴维斯双杀

回测来看。永续合约交易量 与 BTC 价格 的相关系数 > 0.8(跨周期)

  • ·2022 年熊市:永续合约交易量相较 2021 年峰值下跌 70 %。

  • ·收入依赖:91 % 来自交易手续费,极易受到交易量冲击。

  • ·提现延迟:HLP 金库需 4 天锁定,中心化交易所提现需 24‑48 小时

这是经典戴维斯双杀构造:加密资产价格下跌 → 交易量 & 手续费下降,同时估值倍数收缩 → 形成恶性循环。

$HYPE 的估值多数基于过去一年牛市的表现。然而在 Web3 领域,收入具有高度的周期性。我们也应相应地调整基本假设。

与美股不同,拉长来看标普 2008 年以来几乎可以看作平滑增长,但是加密货币市场依然呈现暴涨暴跌的周期特征。虽然宏观市场因素确实难以量化出来,但能否把握这种周期性,正是区分圈内优秀交易员和顶尖交易员的地方。

2.3 加密原生指标

我们知道,即使在传统金融中,市盈率(PE)也非唯一指标,还有比如 EV/EBITDA P/FCF ROIC,对于 HYPE 而言,一些其他重要指标也需要纳入考虑。包括:

  • TVL:43 亿美元,但是较 2025.09 峰值 61 亿美元呈明显下降趋势。

  • P/TVL:2.0( Solana 1.5)。

市场份额:市场份额已从 80 % 峰值降至 70 %,credit to 黑马 Aster。当然还有 lighter edgex 等一堆。

3,傻逼 Dave fud HYPE?也不是那么绝对

尽管我目前不赞同投资 HYPE,但我的看空立场只适用于中期视角。如果我们着眼于 2-5 年的长期投资周期,HYPE 绝对值得投资。这是不需多解释的。

一个完整的投资决策取决于多种因素,包括仓位占比、回撤承受度和投资 目标等等。

熊市里所有项目都承压,有什么出路呢?

预测市场目前可能有更高的性价比, @a16z 研究说预测市场和大盘相关性只有 0.2‑0.4,相较于 $HYPE 的> 0.8。

而且 2026 年将迎来多场高关注度事件,比如世界杯(梅罗等大量老人最后一届)、美国中期选举、冬奥会、英雄联盟全球赛等等,还有相当多游戏电影动漫发行,比如 GTA6, 可以预见将会迎来博彩大年。相当多场外资金可能转入这项盘子,对纳指可能都有影响。所有中期顺势而为的话,prediction market 类项目值得关注

结语:

从中期时间维度来看,大规模解锁、收入周期性以及宏观市场环境转变的风险大于当前估值所带来的回报。本文不构成任何投资建议,所有投资均伴随风险。NFA, DYOR 。

Letture associate

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbit14 min fa

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit14 min fa

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手18 min fa

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手18 min fa

Is Ethereum Truly a "World Computer"?

Title: Is Ethereum Really a "World Computer"? Ethereum, envisioned as a "world computer" by its founder Vitalik Buterin, aims to be a decentralized platform for global applications. However, a recent analysis by Four Pillars raises questions about whether it is more accurately a "Western computer," based on the geographical distribution of its validators. Currently, the United States dominates with 38.19% of all validators, followed by Germany at 13.04%. Combined, these two countries account for over half of the network. In contrast, Asian representation is minimal, with Singapore holding only 3.15%. The concentration is partly due to affordable cloud hosting services like Hetzner and OVH in Europe and North America, as well as the prevalence of residential validators in the U.S., where individuals run nodes via home internet connections. When examining professionally operated validators, the distribution becomes more balanced. The U.S. share drops to 25.81%, while Asian countries like Singapore (7.28%), Hong Kong (6.44%), Japan (6.38%), and South Korea (4.59%) collectively approach the U.S. level. This shift reflects strategic deployments by institutions to meet regulatory requirements and reduce latency for local users. However, regions like South America, the Middle East, and Africa remain underrepresented. Ethereum's peer-to-peer network mechanisms, such as gossipsub, disadvantage areas with low node density, creating a feedback loop where delayed message propagation reduces validator performance and rewards. This imbalance challenges Ethereum's promises of censorship resistance and global accessibility. Despite these issues, opportunities exist for growth in underrepresented regions. As demand for localized staking infrastructure rises, early entrants in areas like the Middle East could establish dominant positions by offering compliant, low-latency solutions. The evolving validator landscape highlights both the structural challenges and the potential for Ethereum to move closer to its "world computer" ideal.

Foresight News2 h fa

Is Ethereum Truly a "World Computer"?

Foresight News2 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片