Капитализация стейблкоина USDe рухнула на 50% из-за падения доходности

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2025-05-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-11-26

Рыночная стоимость синтетической «стабильной монеты» USDe от проекта Ethena обвалилась на 50% за месяц — с $14,8 млрд в октябре до текущих $7,2 млрд.
Источник: DefiLlama.

При этом реальное использование монеты продолжает расти — объем ончейн-транзакций достиг $50 млрд за последний месяц. USDe все еще входит в топ-3 крупнейших стейблкоинов.

Падение капитализации монеты произошло на фоне снижения доходности до 5,1% годовых против двузначных показателей в начале года.

По словам аналитиков из The Block, основная причина — закрытие стратегий с левериджем в DeFi-протоколах вроде Aave. Их механика включала:

  • многократное внесение USDe для стейкинга — sUSDe — в качестве залога;
  • заимствование USDC при максимальных коэффициентах LTV;
  • конвертацию средств обратно в sUSDe для повторения цикла;
  • достижение плеча 10x и более.

Стратегия оставалась прибыльной, пока доходность USDe превышала стоимость заимствования USDC. Однако при ее снижении ниже 5,4% (текущая ставка займа стейблкоина Circle на Aave) произошел массовый выход из позиций.

Ситуацию усугубляют и системные риски DeFi: несколько протоколов столкнулись с вопросами к устойчивости фарминг-пулов со стабильными монетами, в результате чего такие программы начали закрывать.

Динамика наглядно продемонстрировала уязвимость доходных стейблкоинов к быстрому оттоку капитала — те же механизмы, что обеспечивали рост TVL на восходящем тренде, ускоряют отток средств на этапе коррекции.

Дельта-нейтральность синтетического доллара: чем интересен стейблкоин USDe

Даунтренд

TVL протоколов кредитования значительно снизился — с исторического максимума на $90 млрд в октябре до $63 млрд на момент написания.

Источник: DefiLlama.

Почти половина сегмента приходится на Aave — $31,7 млрд. На начало прошлого месяца показатель составлял $44,5 млрд. Общий объем займов на платформе оценивается в $20 млрд при средней годовой доходности около 1,1% годовых.

В тройку лидеров по общей заблокированной стоимости также входят Morpho ($5,9 млрд) и SparkLend ($4 млрд).

Источник: DefiLlama.

Совокупный объем выданных займов на этих платформах составляет $8,9 млрд и $5,7 млрд соответственно.

Напомним, кредитование под залог криптовалют достигло $73,6 млрд в конце третьего квартала, превысив предыдущий рекорд от 2021 года.

Letture associate

Grayscale: Zcash, Financial Privacy in the Age of AI

Grayscale Research suggests a third wave of public focus on financial privacy is approaching, driven by stablecoin/blockchain adoption and new AI-powered surveillance tools. In this context, Zcash emerges as a decentralized digital currency, similar to Bitcoin but with built-in, robust privacy mechanisms via its "shielded" transactions that conceal sender, receiver, and amount using zero-knowledge proofs. While privacy is often seen as a niche feature, it is argued to be a core requirement for functional money, needed by individuals and businesses alike. Zcash's optional privacy is distinct from mixers or default-private chains like Monero. After years of development (Sapling, Orchard/NU5, Ironwood upgrades) to improve usability, key metrics show growing adoption: shielded transactions comprise ~90% of network activity, and ~25% of circulating ZEC is in shielded pools—a historical high. Despite this, ZEC's market valuation remains low (~0.6% of the "digital currency" sector), implying the market prices privacy as a marginal concern. The investment thesis hinges on a potential re-rating if the value of financial privacy is recognized more broadly. Risks include regulatory challenges around shielded transactions, legacy trusted setup pools, quantum computing threats, and execution risks for upcoming upgrades like Tachyon for scaling. In summary, Zcash represents a significant, technologically mature option in the privacy currency space, with current valuation offering potential upside if privacy demand grows.

marsbit17 min fa

Grayscale: Zcash, Financial Privacy in the Age of AI

marsbit17 min fa

The Bear Market Has Ended, A New Bull Cycle Has Begun

**Title: Bear Market Over, New Bull Cycle Begins** Bitcoin surged over 20% in just three days, from a low of $64,100 on August 19th to a high of $79,500 by August 21st, marking a dramatic shift in market sentiment. This rapid rise triggered massive liquidations exceeding $4 billion, with short positions accounting for $3.7 billion—the largest short squeeze since 2021. The rally was fueled by several key factors. Macroeconomic conditions improved as the US Treasury doubled its long-term bond buyback size, easing pressure. Significant regulatory developments included a White House meeting where former President Trump urged Senate action on the CLARITY Act and hinted at potential US Bitcoin reserves, followed by the CFTC Chairman stating the agency would establish crypto market rules if the bill stalls. On-chain data revealed a fierce battle: large whales faced substantial liquidations on short positions, while others took profits or doubled down on longs. Major altcoins like ETH and XRP also saw impressive gains. Analysts are divided but increasingly bullish. Many, including CryptoQuant's founder, declare the bear market over and a new bull cycle begun. Price targets range from $100k by year-end to ambitious long-term projections of $200k. However, some caution against immediate chasing, noting overbought conditions and viewing the move as a potential "trap" ahead of the crucial September 15th Senate vote on the CLARITY Act. The market's next test is sustaining the momentum with real buying pressure, holding above key resistance near $78k-$80k, and watching ETF inflows and the upcoming regulatory vote.

marsbit21 min fa

The Bear Market Has Ended, A New Bull Cycle Has Begun

marsbit21 min fa

Xiaomi Defended Its Smartphone Gross Margin, Yet to Find a Profit Successor

Xiaomi's Q2 2026 financial report reveals a company navigating a complex transition. While smartphone gross margin held steady at 8.5% through strategic product mix and a record-high average selling price (ASP), this came at the cost of a 26.5% year-over-year decline in global shipments, pressuring its core user acquisition engine. This illustrates Xiaomi's central challenge: managing the "timing gap" between its established and emerging growth engines. Its smartphone business is pivoting from scale to premiumization, but it's unclear if high-end models can fully offset the volume loss from more price-sensitive segments, especially in markets like India and Africa. Meanwhile, the electric vehicle segment has become a significant revenue contributor, delivering 104,200 units and generating ¥23.9 billion. However, its profit contribution remains unclear as it, along with AI investments, is still in a scaling and investment phase. The AI and humanoid robot initiatives, though strategically prioritized and tested in Xiaomi's own factories, are in early-stage validation with no near-term commercialization timeline. Financially, the company remains stable, supported by a robust cash position and its high-margin internet services business, which hit a new high in monthly active users. Management emphasized continued heavy investment in AI, chips, and robotics to fuel the next growth cycle. The key question is whether these new engines—cars, AI, robotics—can achieve commercial scale and profitability before the smartphone engine's growth slows further.

marsbit22 min fa

Xiaomi Defended Its Smartphone Gross Margin, Yet to Find a Profit Successor

marsbit22 min fa

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

The article "Would RWA Still Matter Without DeFi?" argues that tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) alone, like putting a barcode on a container, is not transformative. True value emerges when these tokenized assets are integrated into decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems, enabling valuation, financing, hedging, trading, and loss management in a programmable, automated manner. Tokenization provides digital representation, but DeFi provides utility through leverage, liquidity, and composability. The core challenge lies in aligning the different "time clocks" of blockchain (fast, 24/7), traditional markets (limited hours), and asset redemption (slow processes), which creates liquidation risks and gaps. Effective RWA integration requires more than a token; it needs a full stack: legally enforceable rights, reliable data oracles, clear transfer rules, executable secondary liquidity, appropriate collateral parameters, and credible loss resolution paths. Liquidity is defined not by total value locked (TVL) but by the ability to exit a position under stress within a required timeframe. Risk management for RWAs must be modeled as a dependency graph, monitoring interconnected nodes like issuers, custodians, oracles, and liquidity pools for early warning signs beyond just price data. While tokenized government bonds serve as an initial "ping test," the future lies in more complex assets like computing power and energy, which require bespoke risk models. Tokenized stocks paired with perpetual futures present a major test, combining global equity ownership with crypto-native leverage, necessitating robust architectural safeguards like isolation and dynamic collateral rules. The conclusion is that without DeFi, RWA tokenization offers limited value—improving distribution and transparency. The significant opportunity arises when tokenized assets become functional components within open, programmable capital markets, where they can be used as collateral and facilitate complex financial strategies. The token is merely the barcode; the market operating system is the real machine.

marsbit43 min fa

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

marsbit43 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片