Is CBDCs about Freedom or Control? Ripple CTO Speaks Out

TheCryptoTimesPubblicato 2025-10-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-10-29

Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, started a debate around central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and how they might shape financial freedom. 

In a post on X, Schwartz explained that CBDCs are not inherently good or bad; it depends on how they are used. “If a CBDC creates more options for people who want to use it, that’s good. If it becomes an excuse to hamper other options more consistent with individual freedom, that’s bad,” he said.

Schwartz added that CBDCs could actually help people gain access to banking services when private institutions block them. The technology itself is not the problem. What matters is whether governments or banks use it to give people more choices or to limit them. Schwartz’s main point is that CBDCs can either help freedom or reduce it depending on usage.

Ripple’s Role in CBDCs

Ripple has been actively involved in CBDC projects for years. The company worked with countries like Palau, Bhutan, Montenegro, Georgia, and the U.K. on early tests. These projects helped improve Ripple’s XRP Ledger (XRPL). Now, XRPL can handle not only CBDCs but also stablecoins and tokenized deposits.

This experience led Ripple to launch RLUSD, a dollar-backed token. It is available on both XRPL and Ethereum. Its market value is now close to $790 million. Ripple also works with financial companies like DBS Bank and Franklin Templeton to support RLUSD.

Schwartz also wrote about the “war on cash.” He said that banks today can limit people’s freedom by closing accounts or controlling access to money. He compared it to being forced to eat only at approved restaurants, where people have no choice but to cook at home. He believes that CBDCs could fix some of these problems if used correctly.

What the Public and the World Think

However, the public opinion about CBDCs is mixed. On Reddit, people are worried about privacy, and government control. Some even mentioned the failed experiments in Finland, Kenya, and Nigeria as cautionary examples. Others warned that digital money controlled by central banks could cause economic problems.

Globally, central banks are moving forward with digital currencies. For instance, IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva said that digital fiat money is no longer just an idea but is becoming real. India’s central bank is already testing CBDCs for both local and international payments.

India’s central bank openly supports using CBDCs instead of stablecoins for international settlements, and retail and wholesale pilots are already underway.

The debate is no longer about whether CBDCs are coming, but how they will be used. Schwartz and Ripple show that this technology could either give people more choices or take them away, depending on its use.

Also Read: Ex-FTX US Head Launches Perpetual Futures Platform for Traditional Assets


Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

Letture associate

Analysis of 13F Holdings of Seven Major Funds: What Are Buffett, Duan Yongping, Li Lu, and Dan Bin Thinking?

A summary of Q2 2026 13F filings from seven major funds (Berkshire Hathaway, Duquesne Family Office, H&H International Investment, Himalaya Capital, ARK Investment, Oriental Harbor Investment Master Fund, Situational Awareness LP) reveals AI remains the central investment theme, with significant capital reallocation within the sector. Berkshire Hathaway, under Greg Abel, made its largest net stock purchases in years, heavily increasing its stake in Alphabet, signaling a strategic tilt towards tech while maintaining core holdings in consumer and financial stocks. Duquesne Family Office (Stanley Druckenmiller) rotated within semiconductors, selling Micron, Broadcom, and Intel but adding to positions in TSMC, STMicroelectronics, and AMD, while also reinvesting in cloud giants Alphabet and Amazon and cautiously re-entering Chinese tech via Baidu. H&H International Investment (Duan Yongping) and Himalaya Capital (Li Lu) both significantly increased their stakes in PDD, with Li Lu also concentrating his portfolio by selling out of several financial and energy holdings to focus on core positions like Alphabet and Berkshire. H&H also took profits from high-flying AI/tech names like Nvidia and Google, viewing the moves as valuation adjustments rather than a loss of conviction. ARK Investment (Cathie Wood) aggressively bought SpaceX upon its IPO and continued hunting for disruptive innovation across AI, energy, and biotech, while reducing its Tesla holding. Oriental Harbor Investment Master Fund (Dan Bin) executed a dramatic shift towards AI hardware, launching major new positions in Intel, SanDisk, AMD, and others while selling down software/platform holdings like Google and clearing out consumer names Apple and Tesla. Situational Awareness LP's filing, reflecting pre-liquidation positions, showed a story of missed hedging opportunities leading to significant losses. The consensus is that AI growth is continuing, but capital is actively rotating to identify the next profit centers within the value chain—from semiconductors and infrastructure to eventual commercialization. The filings, while lagging, offer a snapshot of how sophisticated investors are positioning for AI's next phase.

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Analysis of 13F Holdings of Seven Major Funds: What Are Buffett, Duan Yongping, Li Lu, and Dan Bin Thinking?

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片