贝莱德 CEO:加密钱包规模超 4 万亿美元,“资产代币化”是下一场“金融革命”

marsbitPubblicato 2025-10-16Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-10-17

原文标题:《全球最大资管 CEO:「加密钱包」规模已超 4 万亿美元,「资产代币化」是下一场「金融革命」

原文作者:龙玥,华尔街见闻

 

全球最大资产管理公司贝莱德的首席执行官 Larry Fink 已将「资产代币化」定位为金融市场的下一场革命,目标「将所有传统金融资产装入数字钱包。」

10 月 14 日,在公司最新的 2025 年第三季度财报电话会议上,贝莱德不仅公布了其管理资产规模(AUM)达到创纪录的 13.5 万亿美元,Fink 更明确指出了公司未来的关键方向。据他透露,全球数字钱包中持有的资产规模已达到约 4.1 万亿美元,这是一个巨大的潜在市场。

Fink 阐述的愿景是,通过将交易所交易基金(ETF)等传统投资工具进行代币化,可以在传统资本市场与精通加密技术的新一代投资者之间架起一座桥梁。

「这是贝莱德未来几十年的下一波机遇,」Fink 在接受 CNBC 采访时表示。这一战略已通过其 iShares 比特币信托(IBIT)的成功得到初步验证,该产品在不到 450 天内资产规模突破 1000 亿美元,成为历史上增长最快的 ETF。

这一前瞻性布局迅速获得了华尔街的积极反馈。投资银行摩根士丹利在一份研究报告中重申了对贝莱德股票的「增持」评级并指出,「所有资产的代币化」是支撑其看好贝莱德前景的核心叙事之一。

瞄准 4 万亿美元的数字钱包市场

贝莱德的战略核心是触达目前游离于传统金融体系之外的庞大资金池。根据 Fink 的说法,这个数字钱包市场规模约为 4.1 万亿美元。

而摩根士丹利在 10 月 15 日发布的报告中估算,当前加密资产、稳定币和已代币化资产的总价值已超过 4.5 万亿美元,而这些资金「目前无法获得长期投资产品」。

据摩根士丹利的分析,贝莱德的目标是「将当今传统金融中的一切复制到数字钱包中」。

通过实现这一目标,贝莱德可以将习惯使用代币化资产的年轻投资者引入股票、债券等更多传统资产类别,并为他们提供长期的退休储蓄机会。

Fink 认为,代币化还能降低交易成本和中介费用,例如在房地产等领域。

资产代币化:金融的未来愿景

Fink 坚信,全球金融的下一次重大变革将来自传统资产的代币化,包括股票、债券和房地产等。他在接受采访时表示,公司将代币化视为通过数字手段将新投资者引入主流金融产品的机遇。

Fink 指出,尽管代币化潜力巨大,但目前仍处于早期发展阶段。他引用 Mordor Intelligence 的研究预测,2025 年代币化资产市场规模已超过 2 万亿美元,到 2030 年有望飙升至 13 万亿美元以上。

贝莱德已在为深入参与这一领域奠定基础。公司内部团队正积极探索新的代币化策略,以巩固其在数字资产管理领域的领导地位。

从比特币怀疑论者到区块链倡导者

Fink 对数字资产态度的转变,标志着主流金融机构对该领域看法的演进。他曾一度将比特币称为「洗钱指数」,但如今的立场已截然不同。

在最近的一次采访中,Fink 承认自己的看法已经改变。他对 CNBC 表示:「我以前是个批评者,但我在成长和学习。」

他现在将加密资产比作黄金,认为其可以作为一种另类投资,用于投资组合的多元化。

华尔街看好「代币化」增长前景

华尔街分析师认为,贝莱德凭借其行业地位和资源,完全有能力在代币化领域占据主导地位。

摩根士丹利分析师 Michael J. Cyprys 在报告中将贝莱德的目标股价上调至 1486 美元,并强调其「代币化所有资产的宏大愿景」是关键驱动力。

报告指出,贝莱德已经通过其代币化货币市场基金 BUIDL 进行试验,该基金自 2024 年 3 月推出以来,资产管理规模已增长至近 30 亿美元。

大摩认为,凭借从最高管理层开始的战略聚焦、公司规模、广泛的业务足迹和客户关系,贝莱德有能力影响未来的行业结构,并与领先的交易所和供应商合作,以执行和提供代币化的贝莱德产品。

贝莱德寻求将传统资产代币化,作为连接传统资本市场和数字资产的桥梁。代币化有潜力将传统资产带入数字钱包原生范式——目前价值超过 4.5 万亿美元的加密资产、稳定币和代币化资产无法接触到长期投资产品。

贝莱德的目标是将当今传统金融中的所有东西复制到数字钱包中,这样投资者永远不需要离开他们的数字钱包,就能构建一个包含股票、债券、加密货币、商品等在内的长期、高质量投资组合。

通过实现这一点,贝莱德可以将大量使用代币化资产的年轻投资者引向更传统的资产,并为他们未来的退休长期储蓄机会做好准备。

Letture associate

Warsh Takes the Helm at the Fed: A Capital Layout Clearing the Way for AI Productivity

Kevin Warsh's confirmation as the 17th Federal Reserve Chair signals a significant strategic pivot, not merely a political victory. The core narrative, as framed by the author's "Universal Code," is that capital flows towards maximizing intelligence output per unit of energy—currently represented by the AI-driven semiconductor and energy infrastructure boom. Warsh, uniquely among candidates, is a former tech investor who has personally invested in this AI "productivity miracle." His mandate is to enable this transformation by aligning monetary policy to support, not stifle, the capital-intensive AI buildout. His proposed policy framework blends elements of 1950s financial repression with Alan Greenspan's 1990s playbook: tolerating higher headline inflation driven by volatile components (e.g., energy) while relying on AI-driven productivity gains to suppress core inflation and unit labor costs. This allows for a more accommodative stance than conventional models suggest. The strategy's success hinges on a coordinated "Treasury-Fed Accord" with Treasury Secretary Bessant. Bessant's role is international: securing foreign demand for long-term U.S. debt through bilateral agreements (e.g., with China, Japan, Gulf states) that offer access to AI infrastructure in exchange for recycling trade surpluses into Treasuries. A weaker dollar and controlled real yields are essential to make this foreign duration buying viable. Warsh's Fed must avoid overly restrictive policy that would break this flow. The underlying coalition driving this agenda consists of crypto founders, AI infrastructure operators, and energy investors seeking policy stability. While Warsh's initial meetings may not deliver immediate rate cuts, they will signal a shift in focus toward core inflation and greater policy discretion. The critical variable is the bond market. If long-term yields, term premiums, or real yields rise beyond certain thresholds (e.g., 10-year yields above 5.5%), the entire architecture could fail regardless of Fed actions. The next six months will determine whether the bond market grants the new Fed Chair the space to implement this framework. If successful, the cycle extends, benefiting risk assets, cryptocurrencies, and AI capital expenditure stocks. The market's current pricing of a conventional inflation fight creates an asymmetry versus this productivity-led, financially repressive framework, which represents the potential for significant returns.

marsbit28 min fa

Warsh Takes the Helm at the Fed: A Capital Layout Clearing the Way for AI Productivity

marsbit28 min fa

Why the Establishment of SocialFi Originates from a Misunderstanding of Its Own Medium

"Why SocialFi's Establishment Stems from a Misunderstanding of Its Own Medium" This article critiques the failure of SocialFi projects by applying Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cool" media. McLuhan posited that a medium's form—not its content—reshapes user behavior. "Hot" media (e.g., print, radio) deliver high-definition, complete information, promoting passive consumption. "Cool" media (e.g., cartoons, telephone calls) provide low-definition, fragmented signals, requiring active user participation to complete the meaning. Traditional social media platforms (like early Twitter) are quintessentially "cool." A tweet or like is an incomplete fragment; its significance emerges only through replies, shares, and community engagement—it's a participation engine disguised as a content system. SocialFi (e.g., Friend.tech) aimed to monetize social capital by attaching real-time, tradable prices to follows and posts. However, this didn't add an economic layer to a cool medium; it fundamentally transformed the medium itself. The explicit, high-resolution signal of price replaced the ambiguous, low-resolution signal of social interaction. The platform became a financial market dressed as a social network. Once the financial dynamics (speculative profits) faded, the underlying social fabric, which had been suffocated from the start, could not sustain it. The medium overheated and collapsed. This "heat death" pattern isn't unique to crypto. Over time, mainstream platforms often drift from cool to hot by adding features like public metrics, verification badges, and algorithmic feeds that optimize for clarity over participation, leading to user disengagement. The article proposes a viable alternative: the "condensation point." Here, capital is introduced locally and infrequently into a cool medium without saturating it. Examples include Substack (subscriptions), Patreon (memberships), and Bandcamp (music purchases). The core social medium remains cool and participatory, while capital condenses at specific, structurally separate points (e.g., a monthly fee). The key lesson: "Liquidity is heat." Adding it to a cool medium doesn't enhance it but alters its fundamental nature. The NFT boom and bust provides a starker example. Collecting is a classic cool medium, where value is built slowly through stories and community. By making floor prices, rarity scores, and real-time charts omnipresent, NFT platforms rapidly overheated the medium, turning collectors into traders and destroying the participatory culture that gave collections meaning in the first place. The conclusion is that for the next wave to succeed, designers must ask not how to price every social action, but how to let capital condense within a social system without disrupting the cool, participatory mechanics that create its enduring value.

marsbit56 min fa

Why the Establishment of SocialFi Originates from a Misunderstanding of Its Own Medium

marsbit56 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片