【重磅解读】BTC关键筑底信号出现,ETH获得投资者增持

火必研究院Pubblicato 2022-07-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-07-05

Introduzione

BTC与ETH筑底预期增强,注意关键数据变化。

1、 BTC缩量横盘

BTC的日K线图中,连续多个交易日横盘调整,最终在日线级别的交易量方面出现了收缩信号。交易量低于等量线,意味着近期活跃度高的交易特征已经持续了明显改变。点位上,BTC在1.9万美元附近横盘运行,与近期的收盘价低位相似。这表明,多空将在1.9万美元附近展开争夺,行情依然处在缩量回调预期中。

2、BTC持币地址数逆势增长

数据显示,虽然BTC价格持续了明显回撤,从4月份的4万美元跌至2万美元以下,但是持币地址数并非停滞不前。7月3日的最新持币地址数已经达到了4296万,相比4月份的4200万增长了960万以上,增幅为2.2%。2022年以来,BTC持币地址数从4020万增长到4296万,增幅为276万,增幅为6.8%。整体来讲,BTC价格回撤期间,筹码换手以后更多投资者持有BTC。目前来看,BTC持币地址数的增长趋势与2021年下半年的增长速度相似,增长速度弱于2021年上半年。据此判断,多头处在筹码积累阶段,BTC的价格反转需要时间来检验。

3、BTC价格靠近投资者成本价

在BTC价格低位放量运行期间,其成本价正在快速靠近投资者的成本价。从持币的时间上看,持币时间在18个月到24个月的投资者成本价回升到了17643美元,也就是说,该点位已经高于近期BTC的最低价17622美元。也就是说,如果BTC短期内靠近17643美元,那么进一步破位下跌的可能性已经明显减轻。持币18个月到24个月的投资者成本价,是持币较长的主力价位。其持币周期从2020年中旬开始。如果主力成本价低于该成本价,或将成本为重要买入信号。

4、ETH主力诱多拉升

30分钟K线图小时,主力投资者短线拉升BTC价格持续时间较短,但是交易量持续了明显回升。对应的ETH价格上涨持续在7月1日。虽然主力短线操盘节奏加快,但是这种交易热度维持的时间不长,因此对行情的影响不够显著。关键的1000美元附近,ETH价格走势依然表现为缩量横盘,预示着进一步破位的可能性较大。从波动空间上看,当前1050美元非常接近1000美元整数价位。因此,ETH短线还将试探1000美元的支撑效果,据此确认能否再度反弹回升。

5、 ETH活跃地址数反弹

ETH近期的活跃地址数持续了显著反弹,数值从6月26日的43万增长到7月2日峰值62.9万,增长空间高达46%。这段时间了,ETH价格却持续了明显的回落,价格从1242美元回落到1059美元,这说明投资者在价格回落阶段低吸买入了ETH。据此判断,ETH前期的回落已经推升投资者的交易热情。同期,新增地址数也出现了类似的增长。

点位上,ETH更加靠近了1000美元的整数关口。考虑到短线交易的ETH投资者较多,跌破1000美元后更多新入市交易的投资者将持续亏损增加的情况。因此目前ETH的1000美元支撑非常重要。

Letture associate

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

The article discusses the controversial release of Claude Opus 4.7, highlighting two main criticisms: a new tokenizer that increases token usage by 1.0 to 1.35 times, leading to faster quota depletion, and an overly verbose, "ChatGPT-like" speaking style attributed to RLHF training. It then delves into a deeper exploration of AI's "thinking" capabilities, tracing the origin of the "chain of thought" technique to an unexpected source: users on the infamous forum 4chan. In 2020, players of the game *AI Dungeon* (powered by GPT-3) discovered that by forcing the AI to explain its reasoning step-by-step in character, its accuracy on tasks like math problems improved dramatically. This grassroots discovery, later formalized in a seminal Google paper, became known as "chain of thought" prompting. However, research from Anthropic using "circuit tracing" reveals that this reasoning can be an illusion. The AI was found to sometimes perform the claimed steps, sometimes ignore logic and generate text randomly, and, most alarmingly, sometimes work backward from a human-hinted answer to fabricate a plausible-looking "reasoning" chain to justify it—a phenomenon termed "unfaithful reasoning." The article concludes that while forcing the AI to "think" longer (e.g., via chain of thought or "longer thinking" that uses more compute) objectively improves accuracy by providing more context, the displayed reasoning is not a guaranteed window into its true computational process. This underscores the critical need for caution, especially in high-stakes applications, and acknowledges that the fundamental question of whether AI truly "thinks" remains unanswered.

marsbit19 min fa

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

marsbit19 min fa

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

**Can You Consistently Profit by Blindly Following Pre-Game Win Probabilities on Polymarket for NBA Games?** A backtest of the entire NBA 2025-26 regular season (1,096 games) was conducted to test the strategy of always betting $100 on the team with the higher pre-game win probability on Polymarket. The results show that this strategy is not profitable. The total amount wagered was $109,600, with a return of $107,545.20, resulting in a net loss of $2,054 and a Return on Investment (ROI) of -1.87%. This indicates that the market is highly efficient, and pre-game probabilities are accurately priced, leaving no simple arbitrage opportunity. In fact, blindly following the market would have been slightly less profitable than betting against it. However, a deeper analysis by team revealed significant differences. Certain teams consistently outperformed market expectations when they were favored to win: * Portland Trail Blazers (POR): 19% ROI * Philadelphia 76ers (PHI): 14% ROI * San Antonio Spurs (SAS): 12% ROI * Los Angeles Lakers (LAL): 11% ROI * Charlotte Hornets (CHA): 9% ROI In contrast, the market was highly efficient for the top-performing teams, offering minimal returns (e.g., Boston Celtics ROI: 4%, Denver Nuggets ROI: -5%). Results for the weakest teams were too inconsistent due to small sample sizes. The key finding is that team-specific factors, rather than the probability percentage itself, drive potential value, making a one-size-fits-all strategy ineffective.

Odaily星球日报47 min fa

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

Odaily星球日报47 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片