Here’s how crypto funds defied a $20B crash with billions in new inflows

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-10-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-10-14

Key takeaways

Did crypto funds see inflows despite the market crash?

Crypto funds attracted $3.17 billion in inflows, even as nearly $20 billion in liquidations rocked the market.

Are altcoin and Ether funds showing weakness?

Yes, both Ether and altcoin funds saw big outflows midweek.


Crypto investment products shrugged off last week’s brutal market crash, drawing billions in new capital despite widespread panic selling. Investors poured $3.17 billion into crypto funds – A sign of confidence even during bouts of sharp volatility and nearly $20 billion in liquidations.

Crypto funds defy the odds

A recent CoinShares report revealed that while total assets under management (AUM) dipped to $242 billion during Friday’s flash crash, inflows remained strong across major crypto funds.

bitcoin crypto

Source: CoinShares

“Friday saw little reaction with a paltry $159 million outflows,” CoinShares’ Head of Research James Butterfill noted, proving the sector’s resilience despite billions being liquidated.

Nic Puckrin, crypto analyst and co-founder of The Coin Bureau, also claimed that while inflows are encouraging, the crash was a wake-up call for overconfident traders. He told AMBCrypto,

“The bloodbath we saw in markets over the weekend is a brutal reminder that, as the crypto market grows and matures, the risks are amplified.”

He went on to add,

“The arrival of spot crypto ETFs and institutional interest has lulled investors into a false sense of security, but it remains the only market that trades after hours.”

Bitcoin [BTC] led inflows with figures of $2.7 billion over the week, bringing YTD inflows to $30.2 billion – Still about 30% below last year’s total of $41.7 billion. The surge in participation also pushed weekly trading volumes to a record $53 billion, including $15.3 billion on Friday alone.

Ether funds see pullback, despite weekly gains

Ether [ETH] investment products recorded $338 million in net inflows over the week.

However, they also faced the largest single-day outflow of $174.83 million on 10 October.

ethereum

Source: SoSoValue

The sell-off dragged cumulative net inflows to $14.91 billion and came during the volatility of Friday’s flash crash. According to Butterfill, investors likely saw Ether funds as the “most vulnerable” during the downturn.

Puckrin noted,

“Ironically, now that the dust has settled, many blue-chip tokens have seen a strong rebound — including Ethereum, which is looking particularly strong back above $4,000. As such, many spot investors find themselves in a similar position to where they were before the flash crash.”

Despite the pullback, trading activity remained elevated though, with $4.77 billion in daily volumes. This hinted at sustained market engagement, even as sentiment briefly turned risk-off.

Altcoins slow down

Altcoin-focused funds lost momentum last week, despite ongoing enthusiasm for upcoming U.S ETF launches. Solana [SOL] products drew $93.3 million, while XRP funds added $61.6 million – Both seeing steep declines from the previous week’s surges of $706.5 million and $219 million.

The slowdown could be attributed to investor caution in the face of the liquidation event. Puckrin said,

“The biggest shock over the weekend was that traders were forced out of even profitable positions due to auto-deleveraging (ADL) on exchanges – a risk management mechanism that most will have not even heard about. It’s a blunt instrument that certainly deserves some scrutiny as exchanges conduct reviews of this mass liquidation event.”

That’s not all though. Especially since the ongoing U.S government shutdown has left at least 16 crypto ETF applications awaiting approval.

crypto

Source: X

According to ETF analyst Nate Geraci, once the shutdown ends, the market could witness a “flood” of new spot crypto ETFs – Potentially a catalyst for inflows.

Share

Letture associate

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

This article presents a perspective from Joseph Chalom, CEO of Sharplink and a former BlackRock executive. He argues that current controversies surrounding the Ethereum Foundation (EF) and ETH's price miss the bigger picture for institutional adoption. Chalom asserts that Ethereum is decisively winning in the three key attributes institutions value most: trust, security, and liquidity. He cites its dominance in stablecoin settlement, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and high-value DeFi as evidence. This success is attributed to the EF's consistent, long-term protocol development over a decade, including major upgrades like The Merge and a robust future roadmap. He defends Ethereum's decentralization as a core strength, not a weakness, stating institutions require a neutral infrastructure not controlled by any single entity. Comparing ETH to Amazon, Chalom suggests critics focusing on short-term price are missing its potential to become the foundational settlement layer for the entire global financial system. The article encourages a contrarian "be greedy when others are fearful" investment approach, drawing parallels to Warren Buffett's strategy and BlackRock's continued investment during crypto winters. Chalom concludes that while the EF correctly focuses on core protocol attributes (CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, Security), a leadership gap exists in market-facing narrative and institutional adoption. He calls for ecosystem participants, including his own firm Sharplink, to become more vocal advocates to support Ethereum's impending "supercycle" of institutional adoption.

链捕手21 min fa

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

链捕手21 min fa

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

"Serenity's Bottleneck Investment Methodology: A Deep Dive" This article dissects the "bottleneck point investment" strategy of the pseudonymous investor Serenity, known for exceptional returns (YTD 4502.45%). The core methodology involves identifying a major technological trend (e.g., AI compute expansion), mapping its supply chain, and investing early in the most irreplaceable, supply-constrained upstream component before the market fully values it. The framework is broken down into a five-factor model: 1. **Deterministic Demand**: Anchored in a large, validated trend. 2. **Constrained Supply**: The component must be difficult to replicate or scale quickly. 3. **Low Market Attention**: Opportunities exist where coverage is sparse. 4. **Value Capture**: The company must have pricing power, high margins, and customer lock-in. 5. **Catalyst**: A near-term event to trigger price discovery (earnings, customer ramp, etc.). The article provides illustrative examples like $AXTI (InP substrates for photonics), $RPI (edge hardware for AI agents), and $AAOI/$LITE (components for cloud ASICs). To apply this method, a six-step process is outlined: identify the macro trend, map the supply chain, pinpoint the true bottleneck, gather evidence (client wins, certifications), assess risks ("anti-thesis table"), and size the position according to research depth. Crucially, the article notes significant limitations: risk of overfitting inferences from sparse data, valuation challenges for pre-revenue companies, liquidity/reflexivity risks due to Serenity's own market influence, and survivor bias amplified by a strong AI bull market. The key takeaway is to emulate the rigorous research process—finding the trend, the bottleneck, the evidence—rather than blindly copying specific stock picks, emphasizing the discipline of "walking through the narrow gate."

marsbit46 min fa

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

marsbit46 min fa

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

This article deconstructs the "bottleneck point" investment methodology of the renowned investor known as "Serenity" (aleabitoreddit). Characterized by a YTD return of over 4500%, the strategy involves identifying a major, confirmed trend (e.g., AI data center expansion), mapping its supply chain, and then pinpointing a critical, hard-to-replace upstream bottleneck that the market has yet to fully price in. The core framework is a five-factor model: 1) **Certain Demand** from a clear megatrend; 2) **Constrained Supply** with high barriers to entry and slow replication; 3) **Low Market Attention**, where the company is overlooked; 4) **Value Capture** potential through pricing power and market share; and 5) a near-term **Catalyst** to trigger re-evaluation. Case studies include **$AXTI** (InP substrates for photonics), **$RPI** (edge hardware for AI agents), and companies like **$AAOI** and **$LITE** tied to hyperscaler-specific ASIC demand (e.g., Microsoft Maia, Amazon Trainium). The article provides a six-step guide for applying this approach: 1) Identify a validated macro trend; 2) Map the entire supply chain; 3) Find the true bottleneck; 4) Gather concrete evidence (e.g., filings, customer contracts); 5) Perform rigorous risk assessment ("anti-thesis"); 6) Match position size to depth of research. Key limitations are also noted: the risk of narrative overfitting, difficulty in valuing early-stage companies, Serenity's own market-moving influence creating reflexivity, and potential survivorship bias due to the AI bull market. The essence of the method is not to copy picks but to adopt the research process: find the trend, locate the bottleneck, verify with evidence, assess valuation, await a catalyst, and then invest with discipline. The philosophy is summarized as "walking through the narrow gate"—seeking non-consensus, structurally vital points within booming industries before they become widely recognized.

链捕手55 min fa

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

链捕手55 min fa

From Suppliers to Shareholders: The Big Three Memory Chip Giants Jointly Invest in Anthropic, AI Supply Chain Power Structure Undergoing Reshuffle

For the first time, memory chip giants Micron, Samsung, and SK hynix have jointly invested in the same AI company, Anthropic, as part of its massive $65 billion Series H funding round. This strategic move, positioning the three rival HBM suppliers as "strategic infrastructure partners," highlights a fundamental shift in the AI industry's power dynamics. With HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) being a critically scarce resource essential for AI model training and inference, securing a stable supply has become a key competitive differentiator. By making these chipmakers shareholders, Anthropic aims to lock in this vital component for its rapid expansion, which includes securing major compute commitments from Amazon, Google, and others. For the memory trio, this investment represents a strategic bet on defining the future of AI hardware. Each company gains: SK hynix reinforces its dominant position in the NVIDIA supply chain; Samsung diversifies its client base beyond NVIDIA; and Micron leverages its geopolitical significance as the sole US-based HBM maker. Their collective move signals that competition in AI is evolving beyond model capability to encompass control over the entire compute supply chain—from chips and memory to power and networking. This vertical integration trend, where infrastructure providers become direct stakeholders in AI firms, marks the industry's maturation as AI transforms from a research project into essential global infrastructure, setting the stage for a new era of ecosystem competition.

marsbit2 h fa

From Suppliers to Shareholders: The Big Three Memory Chip Giants Jointly Invest in Anthropic, AI Supply Chain Power Structure Undergoing Reshuffle

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片