BTC 九月又 “反水”、MNT、ASTER 逆势飙、现在能抄山寨吗?美股黄金都飞了、币圈还远吗?

金色财经Pubblicato 2025-09-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-09-24

币圈最近有点 “内外不一”—— 美股、黄金都在飞,就币圈还在晃;往年让 BTC 犯怵的九月,今年居然没跌,反而藏着复苏信号。更惊喜的是,MNT、ASTER 这些山寨币逆势暴涨,连 LUNA、LUNC 这些 “暴雷老币” 也到了埋伏点?现在该上车还是等!

BTC:九月打破 “跌魔咒”,数字黄金的底气还在

先说说 BTC 的 “反常操作”:每年九月 BTC 都容易跌,让交易者头大,但今年这规律好像失效了 —— 不仅没跌,还隐隐透着复苏信号。要知道 BTC 可是 “数字黄金”,中本聪当初设计它就是 “网上专属钱”,靠区块链记账、矿工验证,总量就 2100 万枚,越挖越少,这种稀缺性让它在币圈稳坐 “大哥位”。

现在的 BTC,就算短期波动,底子也没差:上轮牛市里大公司、基金都把它放进资产负债表,现在 ETF 讨论又热起来;减半后矿工还在升级机器,网络依旧能打。比起那些追短期收益的新项目,BTC 的故事很实在:币少、需求在涨、没老板管,长期看还是难被替代。要是九月能稳住,说不定后面还有惊喜!

山寨币 “杀疯了”:MNT 冲历史高,ASTER 涨 20%,这俩是黑马?

大盘没咋动,但有些山寨币已经偷偷 “起飞”,尤其是 MNT 和 ASTER,简直是弱势里的 “显眼包”:

1. MNT(Manta):靠交易所福利狂涨,山寨币指数被它带活

MNT 最近跟 “开了挂” 似的,现价 1.82 美元,差点摸到 1.90 美元历史高,还把 “山寨币季节指数” 拉到 76 点 —— 这意味着山寨币热度回来了!

jh2xljzbXhxCYyQsanJk2FSA5eZ02qKqDPyr0lAi.png

它能涨,多亏了 Bybit 的 “神助攻”:MNT 成了除稳定币外,第一个在 Bybit 享交易费折扣的币,还能帮交易者用更少本钱冲 VIP。现在 Bybit 占了 MNT 56% 的交易量,流动性全往这凑。

不过也得注意:MNT 的鲸鱼有点 “分裂”,Hyperliquid 上 8 个鲸鱼,多空各一半,最大的鲸鱼还空了 215 万美元的仓位;而且它的交易量太集中在一家交易所,要是后面流动性散了,可能会回调。但短期看,Manta 网络的 L2 活动在涨,DeFi 也在扩,还有上涨空间。

2. ASTER:赵长鹏站台 + 币安 50 倍杠杆,24 小时涨 20%

ASTER 更猛,过去 24 小时涨了 20%,现价 2.04 美元,之前还摸到 2.12 美元历史高,市值飙到 33.7 亿美元。它能火,全靠 “大佬背书 + 赛道风口”:

  • 币安前 CEO 赵长鹏之前夸过它,直接让它的关联代币 48 小时涨了 452%;

  • 币安还上了它的 50 倍永续合约,传闻要上现货,流动性一下就起来了;

  • 本身还搞治理投票、质押折扣、5000 万美元费用回购,实用性拉满。

技术面也给力:1 小时图贴着布林带上轨,RSI 才 62,没到超买,支撑看 1.78 美元,阻力是 2.12 美元。要是能稳住 2.20 美元,下一步能冲 2.30 美元;要是冲不破 2.12,可能回调到 1.96 美元。

tWcJMBQ2p5hRQex48EsnH6lqTZf3zCgvuyEN2i7B.png

Ethena:机构狂买撑住 0.6 美元,布林带收窄要爆波动?

Ethena(ENA)虽然最近有点 “蔫”,现价 0.6027 美元,一周跌 11%,但机构在偷偷 “囤货”,一点不慌:

  • StablecoinX 基金(管理 5.3 亿美元,和 Arthur Hayes 有关)每天买几百万 ENA,现在已经囤了 8826 万枚,价值 5400 万美元,把 0.6 美元撑成了 “铁底”;

  • 还和 Flowdesk 合作扩机构渠道,YZi Labs(前币安 Labs)也站台,长期基本面没差。

技术面看,布林带在收窄 —— 这通常是 “大波动前的安静”,RSI 接近 36,快超卖了。支撑在 0.59 美元,阻力 0.62 美元,要是冲过 0.62,能看 0.70 美元;跌破 0.59 才需要慌。

EBnVFf36vWpnOsdScDyonyifXWfwU5DxHX5c6IBR.png

老币埋伏点:LUNA、LUNC、FTT,中秋附近可能 “搞事情”

最后说个 “老玩家都懂” 的规律:每年中秋节前后,LUNA、LUNC、FTT 这些 “暴雷老币” 都容易异动。现在它们价格在相对底部,止损空间小,有仓位的可以少买点现货埋伏 —— 当然别重仓,毕竟是 “博情绪”,见好就收。

7pP0b2nnZfhoInYLK3FUJEql7ESEII6IwJ8md49P.png

总结:现在能抄底山寨吗?盯紧这 3 点!

  1. 看 BTC 脸色:只要 BTC 不跌破关键支撑,山寨币就能蹦跶,MNT、ASTER 可小仓位试错;

  2. 机构重仓的优先:Ethena 有机构托底,比纯炒情绪的币稳;

  3. 老币埋伏别贪心:LUNA、LUNC、FTT 少买当彩票,别指望翻几倍。

Crypto di tendenza

Letture associate

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

**Title: Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: "Smart Money" Stumbles on the Pitch as "Buying No" Outperforms "Buying Yes"** An analysis of pre-match trades over $5,000 on Polymarket for 20 completed group stage matches reveals a counterintuitive finding: large "smart money" bets were not consistently accurate. Aggregated pre-match buying volume was $89.55 million, with a weighted hit rate of only 48.5%. Holding these positions would have resulted in an estimated net loss of about $1.76 million (ROI -2.0%), challenging the notion that big money reliably predicts outcomes. The data highlights several key dynamics. Draws proved to be a major risk, significantly impacting bets on favored teams, as seen in Belgium-Egypt and Spain-Cape Verde. Markets were more efficient for clear mismatches (e.g., Germany's big win) but became prone to bias when favorites were overvalued. Notably, buying "No" shares (betting against a specific outcome) significantly outperformed buying "Yes," with hit rates of 62.4% vs. 37.5%. This suggests the market often overprices popular narratives, creating value in contrarian positions. Individual trades showed extreme volatility. One wallet (mintblade) earned an estimated $6.77 million by betting against Iran, while another (LEEEROYJENKINS) lost roughly $8.39 million on a Belgium win. The market favors high-risk, high-reward information trading rather than steady arbitrage. For sustained insight, wallets with consistent performance across multiple matches (e.g., swisstony) are more telling than one-off big bets. Ultimately, the Polymarket acts less as a crystal ball and more as a mirror, reflecting crowd bias and the inherent unpredictability of football. True "smart money" may lie not in predicting the future, but in identifying and exploiting market mispricings while respecting risk.

marsbit6 min fa

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

marsbit6 min fa

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

Jeff Bezos Returns as CEO for Third Venture, Still Can't Avoid Musk After stepping down as Amazon CEO in 2021, Jeff Bezos has returned to the front lines as co-CEO of Prometheus, an AI startup he founded. In a recent CNBC interview, Bezos described the experience as "Type 2 fun"—exhausting but ultimately rewarding. Founded less than a year ago, Prometheus has already raised over $18 billion in two funding rounds, achieving a staggering $41 billion valuation. Prometheus aims to develop a "General Engineer AI" to accelerate the entire "invention loop"—design, simulation, testing, and manufacturing—for complex physical products like jet engines, spacecraft, and medical devices. This positions the company at the intersection of Bezos's past experiences: Amazon's platform-building scale and Blue Origin's rigorous physical engineering. This marks Bezos's third major venture, following Amazon and Blue Origin. His co-CEO is Vik Bajaj, bringing expertise from life sciences and hard tech. Bezos now dedicates most of his time to Prometheus, signaling his belief in its transformative potential. The move also comes as Bezos's space company, Blue Origin, faces challenges, including a recent test explosion delaying its New Glenn rocket. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO, surpassing Amazon's market cap. While Musk focuses on AI for executing physical tasks (like Tesla's robots and SpaceX's engineering), Bezos is betting on AI to *invent* in the physical world. Prometheus enters a crowded industrial AI field with players like OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Tesla's Optimus. Its lofty valuation bets on the unproven but massive opportunity to become the foundational platform for engineering in the AI era—a "blue ocean" Bezos hopes to define before Musk does.

marsbit8 min fa

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

marsbit8 min fa

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

The article analyzes a popular theory circulating online that the U.S. stock market may be mathematically incapable of a true, sustained decline due to the country's massive and growing national debt. The argument suggests that the government's only path to managing this debt is through inflation and money printing, which would nominally lift asset prices like stocks, creating a perpetual "melt-up." The author places this idea within the historical context of market melt-ups, such as the dot-com bubble and Japan's asset bubble, where prices detach from fundamentals driven by momentum and FOMO. While acknowledging that a high-debt environment creates incentives for inflation, which is generally favorable for assets over cash, the article refutes key claims of the online theory. It clarifies that interest payments are not about to exceed GDP, that printing money is not the only option for the government, and that stocks do not reliably rise in lockstep with hyperinflation, citing historical examples from Germany, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela. The more probable outcome, according to the author, is a prolonged period of financial repression—moderate inflation above interest rates that slowly erodes debt and cash purchasing power, leading to nominally higher asset prices but potentially lower real returns. The core warning is that while long-term market trends may be upward, this does not eliminate the risk of significant interim crashes (30%, 40%, or more) or guarantee real wealth creation during inflationary times. The conclusion advises against betting one's entire financial future on a smooth, perpetually rising market narrative. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, diversified strategy involving productive assets (stocks, real estate, some gold, short-term bonds) and an adequate cash buffer to avoid forced selling during downturns. The key takeaway is to avoid extreme concentration in expensive assets and leverage, and not to base investment decisions on the hope that every market dip will inevitably be rescued.

marsbit29 min fa

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

marsbit29 min fa

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

The Fate of Digital Banks: A Flashy App is No Match for a Banking License The article argues that despite attracting billions of users with fee-free checking accounts and sleek apps, most "neobanks" struggle to be profitable because their core business—transaction fees—is inherently low-margin. The real profit engine of banking is lending (credit), which generates interest income. However, many early neobanks operated without their own banking licenses, which restricted their ability to lend at scale. Examples like Nubank, Revolut, and Chime illustrate the point. While they gained users with free accounts, their eventual profitability came from rolling out credit products. The piece highlights systemic risks for neobanks that rely on third-party infrastructure, citing the Synapse bankruptcy, which froze user funds and revealed the fragility of such models. The solution, according to the author, is obtaining a formal banking license, like the U.S. OCC's national trust charter. This provides regulatory backing, allows direct custody of funds, and eliminates dependency on intermediary partners. The trend is now evident in the crypto sector, where companies like Kraken, SoFi, and others are actively pursuing such licenses. The article concludes that while technology changes, the fundamental business logic of banking—profiting from lending—remains constant. Successful digital banks ultimately conform to this old model, just with better interfaces and fairer terms.

Foresight News37 min fa

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

Foresight News37 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ASTER

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Aster (ASTER) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente AsterASTER.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Aster (ASTER)Dopo aver acquistato Aster (ASTER), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Aster (ASTER)Scambia facilmente Aster (ASTER) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

668 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.09.25Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare ASTER

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ASTER ASTER sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片