Hyperliquid Community Discusses 45% Supply Burn Proposal

TheCryptoTimesPubblicato 2025-09-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-09-23

Hyperliquid community is anticipating dramatic changes into the HYPE token economy, with the aim of reducing its total supply by over 45%. This proposal is co-authored by popular crypto evangelists Jon Charbonneau and Hasu, aiming to eliminate unminted allocations, burn inactive reserves, and get rid of the excessive token supply. 

The proposal addresses the issue of managing non-outstanding tokens, which can mess with valuation metrics and give investors a skewed view, ahead of incoming token unlocks. 

As per the article, HYPE has a total supply of 1 billion, with around 333.92 million tokens actually in circulation. On the other hand, more than 547 million tokens are still locked up in Future Emissions & Community Rewards (FECR) and the Assistance Fund (AF).

Breaking down the proposal

The proposed changes involve canceling over 421 million unminted FECR tokens, burning 31.3 million AF tokens, and removing the 1 billion cap. As a result, the supply will significantly decrease. However, there will still be room for controlled issuance to meet future demands. Authors claim that this adjustment addresses Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) inconsistencies that tend to deter potential buyers.

Hyperliquid’s FDV currently sits at $49 billion at present price, which also includes valuation of locked allocation. Given that those locked tokens are not in the market, the protocol’s actual valuation plummets to $16 billion. 

The proposal has gained significant buzz within the crypto community, with some giving support while some criticizing. Alpen from Comfy Capital backed the move, saying it “provides more clarity” and “fixes a broken FDV metric that is incorrect.” However, not everyone agrees. 

However, another X user argued that every $1 set on fire is $1 less for liquidity depth, spreads, BD, R&D, product expansion. “I just don’t get how burning money helps a business.” He stressed.

Token utility and fee mechanics

Hyperliquid’s HyperCore platform adds context to these changes. Nearly all trading fees, whether from perpetuals or spot markets, flow into buybacks or token burns. Moreover, HyperEVM charges transaction fees in HYPE, which are fully burned. The system is already focused on cutting down supply and boosting the long-term value of tokens.

Also Read: Base Is A Model Ethereum L2, Enhancing User Experience: Vitalik Buterin


Mobile Only Image

Letture associate

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit10 min fa

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit10 min fa

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手1 h fa

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片