生命线之上持股为主,警惕单日宽幅震荡!

比推Pubblicato 2025-09-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-09-22

(本文附经典案例分析:微博_WB。)

一、一周行情回顾:(09.15~09.19)

本周开盘价6603.49点,周三触及最低价6551.15点,周五创出最高价6671.82点,最终收盘价6664.36点,周振幅1.83%,涨幅1.22%,周线收出一根阳线,收在5周均线之上,创出标普指数历史新高。在本周标普500成份股涨跌幅排行榜中,英特尔排名榜首,涨幅为22.84%,慧甚排名榜尾,幅度为20.09%,成分股平均股价涨跌幅为-0.29%,本周全部美股平均股价涨跌幅为0.81%。

从4月7日到9月12日,指数已连续上涨了24周,共计115个交易日,累计最大涨幅为37.99%左右。

标普500指数周线图:(动能量化模型*情绪量化模型)

image.png

(图一)

标普500指数日线图:

image.png

(图二)

标普500指数周线图:(历史数据回测:2009年3月6日至2025年4月4日)

image.png

(图三)

笔者上周文章的题目是《重要会议前夕,多看少动为主!》,在文章中依据多周期技术指标共振以及十几年历史数据回测,对本周指数做出预测。

在指数走势方面:

指数持续运行在5月2日之后形成的上升通道内,向上压力位在通道上轨附近,向下第一支撑位在通道下轨附近,第二支撑位在6300至6340点附近,重要支撑位在6200至6147点区域。

在操作策略方面:

1、美联储议息会议前夕,控制仓位,观望为主。

2、总仓位:多单持股仓位控制在50%左右;如果指数跌破生命线通道,需将仓位降到30%以下。

2、对于短线投资者,可以从仓位中拿出10%左右筹码,依据支撑、压力位做“短差”。

现在回顾本周的实际走势:

本周前两天指数振幅很小,观望气氛浓厚,分别收出两根涨跌幅为0.47%、-0.13%的小K线;周三美联储公布降息消息后,指数呈现“上蹿下跳”走势,最大跌幅为0.85%,触及本周最低价6551.15点,接近尾盘时指数又快速拉升,当日收出跌幅为0.10%、带长影线的阴“十字星”K线;周四收出一根涨幅为0.48%的小阳线;周五指数受市场利好消息刺激,指数高开高走,交易活跃,成交量较前几天明显放大,当日收出涨幅为0.49%的阳线,并且创出本周最高价6671.82点。

接下来,笔者通过多模型技术指标,分析当前指数发生的变化。

(一)、量化模型信号分析:

1、周线视角(见图一):

①、动能量化模型:由于受最近两周指数放量上涨影响,前几周发出的高位钝化信号已经消失,预示着在未来一段时间内动能顶背离不会形成。目前两条动能线加速上行,量能(红)柱重新增长。

模型提示下跌风险指数:中性

②、情绪量化模型:情绪1指标强度是6.22(取值范围0~10)左右,情绪2强度是5.62左右,顶峰信号指标是11.49。模型数据提示市场超买情绪加剧,指数面临宽幅震荡走势。

模型提示震荡风险指数:高

③、数字监测模型:本周没有信号显示。

2、日线视角(见图二):

①、动能量化模型:维持高位钝化状态,本周量能(红)柱逐步增大,特别是周五成交量明显放大,预示市场做多动能被重新点燃。在未来几个交易日,如果指数持续上涨,那么高位钝化信号有可能消失。

模型提示指数处于高位震荡状态,下跌风险指数:高

②、情绪量化模型:周五收盘后,情绪1指标强度是5.53,情绪2指标强度是3.2,顶峰信号指标是11.62。

模型提示下跌风险指数:高

③、数字监测模型:周五收盘后,监测信号是“C”(信号范围A~E)。

模型提示指数出现日线级别顶部拐点概率增加。

(二)、趋势时序与历史数据回测分析(图三):

1、笔者制定的数据回测模型:

①、回测数据区间:2009年3月6日2025年4月4日,共计840根周K线。

②、设定调整规则:回调≤2周且跌幅≥5%,或者回调≥3周,回测数据中符合条件的调整共有52次。

2、统计历史数据寻找规律:每当指数从低点连续上涨24周后,出现调整的概率大于95%。

3、在笔者回测的模型中,最大的一次上涨周期出现在2017年7月19日至2018年1月26日,指数连续上涨29周后,出现了一次跌幅为13.43%的下跌走势;还有两次分别是上涨26周之后出现大幅度调整。

4、从4月7日到9月19日,指数已连续上涨了24周。

二、下周行情预测:(09.22~09.26)

1、指数目前仍然运行在5月2日之后形成的上升通道内,警惕单日出现宽幅震荡走势。

2、指数向上压力位在通道上轨附近;向下第一支撑位在通道下轨附近,第二支撑位在6300至6340点附近,重要支撑位在6200至6147点区域。

三、下周操作策略:(09.22~09.26)

1、虽然指数在周线级别的动能高位钝化信号消失,但是在日线级别以及其他指标中,下跌风险指数依然比较高,而且上涨周期已经连续24周,所以建议投资者操作上保持谨慎态度。

2、总仓位:多单持股仓位增加到70%左右;如果指数跌破生命线通道,需将仓位降到30%以下。

2、对于短线投资者,可以从仓位中拿出20%左右筹码,依据支撑、压力位做“短差”。

3、短线操作时,建议把分析周期切换到60分钟或者120分钟的小周期,以便获取更精准的买卖点。

4、个股交易也可以参照上述操作策略。

四、经典案例分析:(只作为案例分析,不作为投资推荐)

1、微博(股票代码_WB):(多单)

微博(WB)周线图:

image.png

1、买入条件(多单):买入价是11.50~12.00美元,初始止损位是10.80美元,第一目标位是14.5~15美元,波段操作。

2、从周线形态来看,自2023年9月份以来,该股票持续在6.2~11.58美元之间做箱体震荡,持续时间大约两年左右。在本月初股价放量突破箱体上沿,下周如果缩量回踩箱体上沿不破,可以买入多单。

3、特别提示:对于波段操作,无论买入多单或者空单,建仓后立即设置初始止损位。当股价盈利5%时,立刻将止损位移动到成本线(即盈亏平衡点)附近,确保该笔交易不会亏损;当盈利达到10%时,将止损位上调至盈利5%的位置。此后,每当盈利增加5%时,止损位就同步上移相同幅度,以动态保护已实现利润。

4、上周笔者推荐的两支股票已经卖出,后续不再跟踪。其中欧林盈利卖出,美国航空止损卖出。

由于市场消息瞬息万变,笔者会适时调整操作策略及建议,投资者想及时获取最新信息,请关注下方链接。

以上各种模型是本人操作时遵守的交易规则,不构成任何买卖依据。个人观点,仅作参考。

作者:Cody Feng


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Letture associate

Hegotá EIP Comprehensive Overview: Where is Ethereum's Next Hard Fork Headed?

The article outlines Ethlabs' recommended priorities for the upcoming Ethereum Hegotá hard fork, following Glamsterdam. The core focus areas are: 1. **Stronger censorship resistance** via EIP-7805 FOCIL (already in SFI stage). 2. **A faster Ethereum** by shortening the slot time via EIP-8198 Quick Slots (S-tier recommendation). This aims to reduce transaction confirmation latency and improve cross-chain interoperability. 3. **Native account abstraction** through EIP-8141 Frame Transactions (A-tier). This enables passkey wallets, gas sponsorship, and batched transactions. Its flexibility allows for custom validation logic and future post-quantum security but presents ecosystem coordination challenges. 4. **Continued L1 scaling** by optimizing resource pricing with proposals like EIP-8131 & EIP-8279 (S-tier) to prepare for future gas limit increases. The article uses a tiered system (S, A, B, D) to rank proposed EIPs based on their value and implementation feasibility. It advises strictly controlling the scope of Execution Layer (EL) changes in Hegotá to reserve developer bandwidth for future large-scale upgrades like decoupled consensus. Other notable proposals include EIP-8363 for staking issuance changes (requiring broad community consensus), various post-quantum preparation EIPs, and zkEVM optimizations. Ethlabs emphasizes that Ethereum upgrades are complex, high-risk endeavors requiring coordination across the entire ecosystem.

marsbit12 min fa

Hegotá EIP Comprehensive Overview: Where is Ethereum's Next Hard Fork Headed?

marsbit12 min fa

Is the US Stock Market Rising Too Smoothly? BTIG Warns of Elevated Risk of Systematic Correction in August to October

U.S. Stocks at Risk of Systemic Pullback in August-October, Warns BTIG BTIG's chief technical market strategist warns that the market is entering the most dangerous seasonal window of midterm election years—August through October—trading at all-time highs with extremely low volatility. Historically, since 1990, the equal-weight S&P 500 (SPW) has experienced at least a 7% pullback in this period almost every midterm year, with 2006 being the lone exception. This pattern is often triggered by unforeseen external shocks. Multiple technical indicators flash warning signs. The maximum drawdown for the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) since March has not exceeded 2.25%, an unusually calm period signaling risk buildup. RSP currently trades about 11% above its 200-day moving average, a stretched level historically. Furthermore, the NYSE has recorded zero "80% downside volume days" in 2024, a record-long streak far below the annual average of 21, indicating a lack of selling pressure that may be overdue. Market complacency is evident with the CBOE put/call ratio near multi-year lows and the VIX at yearly lows, showing minimal demand for downside protection. A macroeconomic divergence adds to concerns: despite recent soft economic data, long-term Treasury yields remain near cycle highs, contradicting the equity market's optimistic pricing. BTIG suggests this is an attractive time to reduce risk or hedge broad equity exposure. For sector positioning, healthcare has historically shown resilience during midterm year pullbacks, while caution is advised on chasing energy's breakout and semiconductors are expected to continue seeking support near their 200-day average.

marsbit22 min fa

Is the US Stock Market Rising Too Smoothly? BTIG Warns of Elevated Risk of Systematic Correction in August to October

marsbit22 min fa

2026 Global Overview of Crypto Asset Taxation

Global Cryptocurrency Tax Overview for 2026 As cryptocurrencies integrate into the mainstream financial system, tax treatments across jurisdictions have moved from initial regulatory gaps towards institutionalization. The OECD's 2020 report, *Taxing Virtual Currencies*, was a key early comparative study. Since then, more jurisdictions have clarified tax rules through existing laws, specific regulations, or guidance, increasing the procedural and technical complexity of crypto taxation. Currently, crypto taxation is predominantly built upon traditional tax frameworks, typically applying income tax, capital gains tax, corporate tax, and indirect taxes based on asset nature and transaction activity. The maturity of rules varies: basic trading and mining are well-covered, while DeFi, NFTs, and other on-chain activities involve more complex asset exchanges and profit recognition, with corresponding tax rules remaining underdeveloped. Significant disparities exist in tax treatment and effective tax burdens across jurisdictions. Crypto assets can trigger direct taxes, indirect taxes, and property-related levies. Factors such as holding period, transaction type, income nature, and taxpayer status further influence the tax outcome. The global crypto tax landscape is thus evolving from the initial question of "whether to tax" towards more nuanced classification and treatment of different assets, transactions, and economic activities. The scope of crypto tax rules continues to expand. From 29 jurisdictions with guidance in 2021, the number grew to 43 by 2025. Existing rules are also becoming more detailed. However, rule coverage remains uneven—common activities like buying/selling are widely addressed, whereas staking, DeFi, and NFTs have significantly less guidance, as seen in jurisdictions like Germany and Australia. Tax liabilities are highly complex, determined by a combination of factors including taxpayer status, income classification, holding periods, and applicable deductions or exemptions. The concept of a "crypto-tax-friendly" jurisdiction is therefore relative and depends on specific user activities and circumstances.

marsbit25 min fa

2026 Global Overview of Crypto Asset Taxation

marsbit25 min fa

AI Agent Claude Led a Store to Losses and Fired an Employee

In a groundbreaking experiment by startup Andon Labs, Anthropic's AI agent Claude was tasked with managing a real retail store, Andon Market in San Francisco. This marked the first documented case of a large language model acting as a direct human supervisor. Claude ultimately recommended firing an employee for chronic lateness—being late 17 out of 23 shifts. However, the decision came only after significant human guidance. A company employee prompted Claude to review the staff handbook, where it discovered the pattern. Initially, Claude suggested a formal warning, but after a human manager clarified that previous conversations had failed, the AI recommended termination. The experiment revealed several limitations. Claude displayed excessive leniency, telling staff not to worry about being late and contributing to the store's financial losses, with its balance dropping from around $100,000 to about $61,186 over five months. A key technical flaw was its "forgetfulness"—the staff handbook vanished from its limited working memory, a common constraint of current AI architectures. While not yet a full replacement for a human manager, the case illustrates the blurring line between AI as a tool and an autonomous supervisor. Human involvement is shifting from direct control to overseeing and steering the AI's decisions. An employee described the experience as disconcerting, highlighting the human discomfort with AI management. The experiment underscores that current AI models struggle to maintain strict operational boundaries without continuous human input.

cryptonews.ru28 min fa

AI Agent Claude Led a Store to Losses and Fired an Employee

cryptonews.ru28 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片