DoubleZero Launches Mainnet to Cut Blockchain Latency

TheCryptoTimesPubblicato 2025-09-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-09-19

DoubleZero has announced the launch of its mainnet-beta, as the decentralized protocol is looking forward to building a high-performance network layer for blockchains. Backed by prominent investors including Multicoin Capital and Dragonfly, the project introduces a novel “N1” base layer designed to solve network latency issues that hinder the performance of distributed systems.

The system wants a “fast lane” for validators. In order to do this, a group of separate contributors uses specialized high-performance fiber links to provide bandwidth. The project says that this technology can cut latency by up to 50% compared to regular internet connections. This makes block propagation faster and improves the overall performance of the validator. 2Z is the network’s native utility token. It is a Solana SPL token that is used to collect fees from users and send the money to the infrastructure providers.

The mainnet-beta is coming out with a lot of infrastructure support, like more than 70 global links and 200+ validators around the world. In a 2024 token round, the project raised $28 million to pay for its growth. Anatoly Yakovenko, co-founder of Solana, said in a statement about the launch that the project helped the company’s vision: “Solana has always had the mission of synchronizing the world’s information at the speed of light, and DoubleZero’s fiber network brings that vision closer to reality.”

Focus on Token Model and Network

The 2Z coin from DoubleZero is based on a tokenomic model that aims to match network supply with real-time demand. The protocol says that people who help the network are only repaid with money that users pay within a certain epoch. This confirms sellers are being paid for providing useful bandwidth instead of artificial volatility. The 2Z coin is based on Solana, and the network’s main goal right now is to support the Solana ecosystem. DoubleZero is made to work with any blockchain, and the ultimate goal is for it to serve all high-performance distributed systems.

The launch of DoubleZero’s mainnet is a big step toward fixing the physical network layer, which is a crucial but often ignored problem with blockchain scalability. Traditional Layer 1 and Layer 2 options focus on making computers or storage better. DoubleZero, on the other hand, targets the infrastructure that sends and receives data. This method could set a new standard for high-performance decentralized networks if it works. This could improve network decentralization, make validators more efficient, and let more demanding apps run on-chain.

Also read: Plasma To Launch Mainnet Beta With $2B Stablecoins


Mobile Only Image

Letture associate

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

An article compares the core architectural philosophies of WeChat and Telegram, highlighting fundamental differences in data storage, monetization, and developer ecosystems. **Data Storage:** Telegram offers unlimited, synchronized cloud storage for seamless access across all devices. In contrast, WeChat stores chat history locally on each device, requiring a manual migration process for transfer and tethering desktop sessions to an active smartphone. **Features & Ecosystem:** Telegram's open Bot API allows for easy, free bot creation, while WeChat's massive ecosystem of over 4.8 million "mini-programs" operates within a closed, curated, and more regulated platform. Commenting also differs: Telegram uses integrated discussion threads for channels, whereas WeChat relies on pre-moderated comments for official accounts and separate chats for interaction. **File Sharing & Payments:** Telegram supports large file transfers (up to 4GB for Premium), while WeChat limits most files to 200MB. A key divergence is in payments: WeChat Pay is deeply integrated into daily life and commerce in China, whereas Telegram lacks a comparable built-in fiat payment system, focusing instead on third-party bots and crypto. **Analysis:** The comparison reveals two distinct models: WeChat is a tightly integrated, closed ecosystem deeply embedded in the real economy, while Telegram prioritizes open protocols, flexible data handling, and low barriers for developers. An added perspective notes that WeChat's fusion of messaging and payments in a single interface without end-to-end encryption for chats potentially broadens the attack surface, raising security questions as more functions converge.

cryptonews.ru3 h fa

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

cryptonews.ru3 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片