Kiyosaki Slams Schools for ‘Fake Money’ Indoctrination

TheCryptoTimesPubblicato 2025-09-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-09-19

Robert Kiyosaki, the author behind the best-selling “Rich Dad Poor Dad” and a vocal Bitcoin (BTC) advocate, had criticized the U.S. education system. He has called it a form of indoctrination that traps young people into working for “fake money”.

On Wednesday, speaking on “The Bitcoin Podcast,” hosted by Jordan Walker, Co-Founder of Bitcoin Collective, Kiyosaki argued that schools and professors push a flawed financial playbook: attend college, secure a job, grind away, stash savings, and funnel money into 401(k) plans loaded with underperforming assets. 

“Poor people are poor because they have no idea what real money is,” he said. Kiyosaki reserved sharp words for central banks, labeling them “criminal organizations” and even “Marxists.” He claimed their money-printing policies enrich the wealthy while eroding the middle class and the poor. 

He added, “Every time you print money, you print this fake stuff here. Guys like me get richer, but the poor middle class get poorer.” Data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics underscores his point on inflation’s toll. A $1,000 holding from August 2000 to August 2025 would have lost about 47% of its purchasing power. 

Kiyosaki: Bitcoin soars as inflation persists, ETFs risky

The Federal Reserve targets 2% annual inflation, but August 2025 figures clocked in at 2.9% for headline inflation and 3.2% for core inflation, levels above the goal that have persisted since 2021. In contrast, Bitcoin has surged over 900% in the last five years, climbing from roughly $11,670 to about $117,200 as of Thursday, per CoinGecko

Kiyosaki, who bought his first BTC at $6,000, now holds around 60 coins, valued at roughly $7 million. His strategy now includes funneling rental property income into Bitcoin, Ethereum, gold, silver, and oil.

Looking ahead, Kiyosaki reiterated his April forecast that Bitcoin could hit $180 million by this year. Yet he urged caution on exchange-traded funds (ETFs), dubbing them “paper assets” prone to collapse in a bank run, though he conceded they’re the simplest entry for everyday investors.

Kiyosaki’s remarks echo broader debates on inflation’s global bite. Economist Saifedean Ammous, author of “The Bitcoin Standard,” recently predicted on his X post that Argentines would flee the devaluing peso toward the U.S. dollar and Bitcoin. On May 20, 2025, Real Vision CEO Raoul Pal similarly advised on X that stacking crypto and non-fungible tokens against currency erosion.

On July 28, 2025, Kiyosaki warned of a potential U.S. economic crash akin to 1929, urging people to rethink 401(k)s and IRAs heavy in stocks. He noted Buffett and Rogers sold stocks for cash or silver, while he holds gold, silver, and Bitcoin.

Also Read: Atkins Softens SEC Enforcement, Backs Crypto Growth


Mobile Only Image

Letture associate

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

An article compares the core architectural philosophies of WeChat and Telegram, highlighting fundamental differences in data storage, monetization, and developer ecosystems. **Data Storage:** Telegram offers unlimited, synchronized cloud storage for seamless access across all devices. In contrast, WeChat stores chat history locally on each device, requiring a manual migration process for transfer and tethering desktop sessions to an active smartphone. **Features & Ecosystem:** Telegram's open Bot API allows for easy, free bot creation, while WeChat's massive ecosystem of over 4.8 million "mini-programs" operates within a closed, curated, and more regulated platform. Commenting also differs: Telegram uses integrated discussion threads for channels, whereas WeChat relies on pre-moderated comments for official accounts and separate chats for interaction. **File Sharing & Payments:** Telegram supports large file transfers (up to 4GB for Premium), while WeChat limits most files to 200MB. A key divergence is in payments: WeChat Pay is deeply integrated into daily life and commerce in China, whereas Telegram lacks a comparable built-in fiat payment system, focusing instead on third-party bots and crypto. **Analysis:** The comparison reveals two distinct models: WeChat is a tightly integrated, closed ecosystem deeply embedded in the real economy, while Telegram prioritizes open protocols, flexible data handling, and low barriers for developers. An added perspective notes that WeChat's fusion of messaging and payments in a single interface without end-to-end encryption for chats potentially broadens the attack surface, raising security questions as more functions converge.

cryptonews.ru5 h fa

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

cryptonews.ru5 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片