Tether 推出美国合规稳定币 USAT，与 Circle 一较高下？

深潮Pubblicato 2025-09-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-09-15

USAT 预计于 2025 年底前正式上线，初期对美国居民、企业和机构用户开放。

撰文：1912212.eth，Foresight News

9 月 12 日，Tether 宣布推出全新稳定币 USAT，这是一款专为美国市场设计的、完全合规的美元支持稳定币。同时宣布任命 Bo Hines 为未来美国 Tether USAT 的首席执行官。

加密货币领域，Tether 的 USDT 市值已超过 1700 亿美元，广泛用于交易、跨境支付和 DeFi 应用。Tether2024 年全年盈利超过 130 亿美元，2025 年上半年总盈利约 57 亿美元，其中 Q2 单季度净盈利创纪录 49 亿美元，主要来自美国国债收益率和储备增值。

据 defiLlama 数据显示，截止 9 月 14 日，稳定币总市值约为 2892.34 亿美元，其中 USDT 占比为 58.96%，占据市场主导地位。

然而，随着美国监管环境的日益严格，Tether 面临着合规压力。Tether 推出全新稳定币 USAT，被视为进军美国本土市场的战略性举措。

Tether 的这一决定并非突发奇想，而是对全球监管趋势的回应。自 2022 年以来，美国证券交易委员会（SEC）和商品期货交易委员会（CFTC）等机构加强了对稳定币的监管力度。USDT 作为一种非美国本土发行产品，曾多次卷入争议，包括储备金透明度和反洗钱合规问题。Tether 总部位于英属维尔京群岛，虽然其稳定币在全球流通，但在美国的使用受到限制，部分交易所和机构不愿直接支持非合规资产。推出 USAT 的目的，正是为了填补这一空白，提供一款符合美国法律框架的稳定币选项。 USAT 将以 1:1 的比例锚定美元，由 Tether 的储备金支持，包括现金、美国国债等高流动性资产。

USAT 的核心亮点在于其「美国合规」属性。根据 Tether 的官方声明，该稳定币将由一家新成立的美国子公司发行和管理，预计在 2025 年底前正式上线，初期针对美国居民、企业和机构用户开放。与 USDT 不同，USAT 将严格遵守《银行保密法》（BSA）和反洗钱（AML）规定，支持 KYC 验证。

此外，USAT 官网发布重要提示称，USAT 并非法定货币，且不会由美国政府发行、支持、批准或担保。USAT 不受美国联邦存款保险公司（FDIC）、证券投资者保护公司（SIPC）或任何其他政府机构的保险保障。

值得一提的是，Tether 任命 Bo Hines 担任新业务的 CEO，Bo Hines 是一位政治和商业领域的资深人士，曾担任前总统唐纳德·特朗普的顾问，并在 2022 年竞选北卡罗来纳州国会席位。他以保守派立场著称，尤其在加密货币监管和创新政策上持积极态度。

Hines 的加入被视为 Tether 拉拢美国政界影响力的信号。Hines 透露公司新的美国总部将设在北卡罗来纳州夏洛特。

从市场影响来看，USAT 的推出可能会重塑美国稳定币格局。目前，USDT 在全球交易量中占据主导，但在美国本土，Circle 发行的 USDC 凭借其合规优势已领先一步。USDC 的市值约为 731 亿美元，主要服务于美国机构，如 Visa 和 Mastercard 已将其集成到支付系统中。

USAT 的出现将直接挑战 USDC 的地位，尤其是在企业级应用上。Tether 声称 USAT 将支持更低的交易费用和更高的流动性，适合用于供应链金融、房地产交易和跨境汇款。例如，一家美国出口商可以使用 USAT 即时结算海外订单，避免传统银行的高手续费和延迟。这在当前全球经济不确定性加剧的背景下，具有显著吸引力。

Letture associate

Leading Players in Large Models Drain the Primary Market

The AI industry is witnessing an unprecedented concentration of capital into a handful of leading players, signaling what insiders call the "eve of a final shakeout." A staggering funding surge exceeding $7 billion hit just three Chinese companies in May alone—Kimi, StepFun (接近完成融资), and DeepSeek—with the latter's valuation reaching $45-$50 billion. Globally, giants like OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX (set to merge with xAI) are preparing for public listings, collectively eyeing valuations over $3 trillion. This capital is no longer fueling a broad "hundred-model war" but is being funneled to "refuel" the final few contenders, following a sector-wide attrition rate exceeding 90%. This frenzy is driven by a fundamental shift in industry logic. The focus has moved from比拼模型智商 (competing on model intelligence) to "token factory economics." The explosion of long-context AI agents has massively increased token consumption per task. With token supply constrained by bottlenecks in HBM memory and power infrastructure—key factors in production costs—dominance now hinges on owning and efficiently operating large-scale compute resources. Major tech firms are investing hundreds of billions annually in this AI "power grid." Consequently, competition pivots to three core areas: 1) **Monetization** as the "AGI premium" cools, forcing a shift from user growth to revenue; 2) **Cost efficiency**, where reducing inference costs becomes the ultimate KPI as model capabilities commoditize; and 3) **Strategic path divergence** between enterprise-focused AI (prioritizing integration and reliability) and consumer-facing applications (betting on scale and user engagement). The message is clear: the final capital injections are determining the endgame lineup. Success will depend not just on technical prowess, but on transforming technology into a sustainable, profitable business model with demonstrable return on massive compute investments.

marsbit4 min fa

Leading Players in Large Models Drain the Primary Market

marsbit4 min fa

AI Giants Queueing Up for IPOs: Is This the 'Last Dance' for the U.S. Stock Market?

A massive wave of IPOs from AI giants like OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX is taking shape, potentially reshaping the U.S. stock market. OpenAI is reportedly preparing for a historic IPO, targeting a valuation over $1 trillion and raising roughly $60 billion, which would dwarf previous records. Anthropic is also advancing its own IPO plans, projecting significant revenue growth and achieving quarterly operating profit. However, their financial profiles starkly differ. While Anthropic is nearing profitability with a focus on enterprise clients, OpenAI continues to report substantial losses, with a negative operating margin and expectations for positive cash flow only by 2029-2030. Analysts warn these listings could trigger a major "passive fund reshuffle," forcing index funds to sell holdings in established tech giants to make room for the new entrants, potentially pressuring the broader market. Some observers view the IPO rush as a "risk transfer," allowing early private investors to cash out at peak valuations while passing future financial uncertainty to public market investors. The divergent paths of Anthropic's near-term profitability versus OpenAI's long-term, high-cost growth narrative present a critical choice for investors. The outcome of these IPOs is seen as a major swing factor for risk assets in 2026, testing whether this surge marks a new cycle or a potential peak.

marsbit12 min fa

AI Giants Queueing Up for IPOs: Is This the 'Last Dance' for the U.S. Stock Market?

marsbit12 min fa

The Richest Fed Chair in 112 Years Is Here: Kevin Warsh Is Rewriting the Rules

Kevin Warsh, with a personal fortune exceeding $130 million, became the 112nd and wealthiest Chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve on May 22nd. A former Wall Street investment banker and key figure during the 2008 financial crisis, Warsh lacks a traditional academic background for a central banker but brings deep market experience. He proposes an unconventional policy approach of simultaneously reducing the Fed's balance sheet ("quantitative tightening") while cutting interest rates, arguing that a smaller balance sheet would allow for more effective rate policy. His ascent marks a potential regime change at the Fed. Warsh aims to reform the institution's decision-making processes, tighten communication discipline among officials, and reduce reliance on forward guidance like the "dot plot." This shift responds to the Fed's current dilemma: fiscal policy is expanding the government's balance sheet through deficits, while monetary policy's ability to shrink its own $6.7 trillion balance sheet is severely constrained, creating pressure on long-term interest rates. Analysts expect Warsh's tenure to sustain high volatility in the U.S. Treasury market due to persistent supply pressures. Furthermore, his leadership coincides with a gradual, structural erosion of dollar dominance, evidenced by its declining share in global reserves and cracks in the petrodollar system, with increased use of alternatives like the Chinese yuan in oil trade. For investors, this environment underscores the importance of portfolio diversification, including assets like gold and Chinese sovereign bonds, amid a fluctuating dollar credit anchor.

链捕手26 min fa

The Richest Fed Chair in 112 Years Is Here: Kevin Warsh Is Rewriting the Rules

链捕手26 min fa

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

**Tau Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine for the Post-Moore Era** For 60 years, progress in semiconductors was driven by Moore's Law – making transistors smaller, denser, and cheaper. This path has now stalled due to plummeting returns below 7nm, astronomical lithography costs, and rising per-transistor expenses. After six years and testing 381 production chips, Huawei’s semiconductor team proposes a fundamental shift: **stop competing on size, start competing on time**. This is the core of their "τ (Tau) Scaling" theory. It treats *time* as the key optimization metric, compressing characteristic delays (τ) across all levels – from transistor switching (picoseconds) to data center tasks (seconds), spanning 12 orders of magnitude. **What is τ Scaling?** It holistically minimizes delay/time constants (τ) across four layers: transistors (switching speed), circuits (signal delay), chips (compute/memory access), and systems (end-to-end communication). The goal is to align optimization from process and circuit design to architecture and systems using this unified metric. **Mobile Application: LogicFolding** Without advancing the process node, this technique vertically stacks chips using ultra-precision hybrid bonding, distributing critical paths across layers ("stacking floors"). Results include a 55% transistor density increase, 41% better energy efficiency, over 40% higher SRAM frequency, and a roadmap targeting 4GHz by 2029. **AI Data Center Application: Full-Link Latency Compression** With 80% of AI cluster energy and 70% cost spent on data movement, the focus is slashing communication time. Key innovations include: 1. **Unified Bus:** Cuts multi-layer protocols, reducing remote access latency from microseconds to ~100 nanoseconds – 500x faster. 2. **Hi-ONE Optical Interconnect:** Replaces copper with fiber, enabling 8Tb/s per module and scaling distances from 1m to 100m for 10,000-chip clusters. 3. **3D Folding:** Solves the "interface bottleneck" of 2.5D packaging by vertically integrating memory, power, and optical I/O alongside compute, predicting over 100x integration density gain by 2035. **Re-fusion of Logic and Memory** The AI era, where data movement is more critical than computation, demands tight 3D integration of logic and memory, shifting industry influence towards memory and advanced packaging. **Remaining Challenges** include adapting EDA tools for 3D design, optimizing wafer-to-wafer process variation and vertical interconnect losses, and establishing new energy efficiency and benchmarking standards. **Conclusion:** The era of scaling physical dimensions is over. The era of scaling time has begun. By leveraging 3D stacking, system architecture, and interconnect optimization—rather than solely chasing advanced lithography—performance and efficiency can continue to advance. This is poised to be the semiconductor industry's core roadmap for the next decade.

marsbit1 h fa

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

marsbit1 h fa

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

**Summary: The Fundamental Flaws of NodeStrategy, the 'First Ordinals DAT'** NodeStrategy presents itself as the first Ordinals Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) on Bitcoin. Its model mirrors MicroStrategy's treasury narrative but for NFTs, specifically targeting the NodeMonkes collection (not officially affiliated). The project's core mechanism is a four-step flywheel: a 10% fee on all trades (90% to treasury, 10% to radFi/Bound marketplace) is used to buy NodeMonkes. These NFTs are then listed for sale on Satflow, with 100% of the sale proceeds used to buy back and burn the project's token, NODESTRAT, aiming to create a perpetual value cycle. However, the design contains critical, self-defeating flaws: 1. **Platform Lock-In:** As a Bitcoin Rune, NODESTRAT lacks smart contract functionality and cannot natively enforce the 10% fee. The fee can only be collected on the radFi/Bound marketplace itself. This makes the entire flywheel dependent on a single platform. If liquidity moves elsewhere, fee revenue drops to zero, halting the mechanism. 2. **Self-Suffocating Economics:** The 10% fee acts both as the flywheel's fuel and a major drag on demand. A buy/sell roundtrip incurs a 20% cost, creating a massive hurdle for traders. This strangles the very trading volume needed to generate fees. 3. **Ineffective Value Support:** The flywheel is starved. Low daily volume (~$9K) generates minimal fees for NFT purchases. The NFT "ladder" sales are slow and unpredictable (only 39 total sold), meaning buybacks are infrequent. While 30.77% of the supply has been burned, this supply reduction cannot lift price without corresponding demand, which is suppressed by the high transaction tax. 4. **Meaningless NAV:** The Net Asset Value (NAV), currently at a 0.46x discount to market cap, is merely a marketing figure. There is no redemption mechanism for token holders to claim the underlying NodeMonkes assets. Price is set by market liquidity flows, not by this theoretical backing. In essence, NodeStrategy's design forces its revenue source (trading fees) to simultaneously cripple the demand and liquidity required for its own success, trapping the project in a stagnant state.

marsbit1 h fa

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures