Three Arrows Capital Gets Notice Of Default On $660 Million Voyager Loan

BitcoinistPubblicato 2022-06-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-06-28

Introduzione

Multiple news outlets have reported that Three Arrows Capital is under intense pressure to meet a Monday deadline and return...

Multiple news outlets have reported that Three Arrows Capital is under intense pressure to meet a Monday deadline and return more than $670 million in loans or face default.
The likelihood of the crypto-focused hedge fund missing the deadline set by Voyager Digital for repaying a loan of 15,250 Bitcoin and $350 million in USDC could have massive repercussions for the whole digital asset market.
As of Monday’s exchange rate, the total loan amount exceeds $675 million. Voyager granted Three Arrows until the 24th of June to pay back $25 million in USDC and the remaining loan balance by June 27.
Voyager Shares Down After 3AC Exposure Revealed
This year, shares of the Toronto Stock Exchange-listed company Voyager have dropped by 94%. The share price of Voyager plummeted more than 60% last week after the company acknowledged it had exposure to 3AC.
According to reports, Voyager wants to pursue a recovery from Three Arrows and is currently involved in discussions with its counsel regarding the various legal alternatives available to it.

Image: PR Newswire Stephen Ehrlich, the chief executive officer of Voyager Digital in Toronto, stated:
“We are working diligently … to strengthen our balance sheet and pursuing options so we can continue to meet customer liquidity demands.”
Three Arrows is renowned for its highly leveraged crypto wagers and is one of the most prominent crypto hedge funds. The ostensibly insolvent crypto hedge fund, also known as 3AC, continues to execute client orders and process withdrawals while operating normally.
Alameda Ventures awarded Three Arrows a $500 million credit facility, of which the company has already utilized $75 million. Additionally, 3AC may continue to utilize the Alameda “to facilitate customer orders and withdrawals, as needed.”

Crypto total market cap at $921 billion on the daily chart | Source: TradingView.com
Three Arrows Might Sell Its Assets
The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Three Arrows Capital, based in Singapore, is considering options including the sale of assets and a bailout by another company as a result of a market decline in digital assets.
3AC’s default on the $660 million loan reveals the hedge fund’s stressed liquidity. A significant decline in the value of Lido staked Ethereum (stETH), which 3AC had heavily used as collateral, exposed the company to repeated margin calls, causing it to exhaust its financial resources.
Three Arrows’ issues looked to have begun earlier this month when Zhu Su, Co-founder and CEO of Three Arrows Capital, tweeted a somewhat strange message stating that the firm is in the process of “communicating with all relevant stakeholders” and dedicated to finding a solution.

Letture associate

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手7 min fa

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手7 min fa

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit42 min fa

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit42 min fa

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit48 min fa

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit48 min fa

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News53 min fa

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News53 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片