OpenEden Appoints BNY as Investment Manager for Tokenized Fund

TheCryptoTimesPubblicato 2025-08-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-08-13

Singapore-based fintech company OpenEden announced on Wednesday that it has appointed The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY), a U.S. financial firm, as the investment manager and primary custodian for the assets supporting its Tokenized U.S. Treasury Bills Fund ($TBILL).

Launched in 2023, $TBILL mints Treasury bill tokens to give investors direct exposure to a pool of short-dated U.S. Treasury bills and overnight reverse repurchase agreements. It has approximately $278 million assets under management (AUM).

As per the company’s press release, the $TBILL Fund will be sub-managed by market leader BNY Investments Dreyfus, which has over 50 years of experience managing liquidity. BNY will also act as the primary custodian, leveraging its existing infrastructure to manage assets valued at US$55.8 trillion. This collaboration highlights BNY’s growing presence in the servicing of digital assets. 

“OpenEden’s collaboration with BNY marks a critical milestone in our mission to deliver secure, transparent, and institution-ready tokenized financial products,” said Jeremy Ng, Founder and CEO of OpenEden.

“BNY plays a critical role in the digital assets ecosystem, serving as a trusted bridge between traditional finance and emerging technology for clients,” said Jose Minaya, Global Head of BNY Investments and Wealth.

The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, or BNY, will oversee the fund and make investments in Treasury bills, money market funds, and other securities that will support OpenEden’s tokens. 

The decision comes amid significant regulatory support for tokenized money market funds and as major U.S. banks consider entering the cryptocurrency space.

Also Read: Pantera Capital Unveils $300M Investment in Crypto Treasury Firms

Letture associate

TRON Sets Transaction and Active Address Records Driven by Stablecoin Settlements

The TRON network achieved new usage records in June, driven primarily by stablecoin settlement activity. Total transactions exceeded 385 million, while active wallet addresses reached 26.9 million. This growth, centered on stablecoins like USDT, highlights a significant shift in on-chain activity and capital flow. The data, sourced directly from Tronscan, provides a concrete, verifiable snapshot of network adoption rather than speculative price movement. While these metrics confirm strong current usage, the report cautions against directly equating them with guaranteed price performance, noting that execution and regulatory risks remain. The development offers a durable data point for assessing where crypto activity is concentrating.

bitcoinist17 min fa

TRON Sets Transaction and Active Address Records Driven by Stablecoin Settlements

bitcoinist17 min fa

TRON Nile Testnet Deploys Quantum-Resistant Signature Cryptography

TRON's Nile testnet has deployed an upgrade implementing quantum-resistant signature cryptography, a proactive step to secure its ledger against potential future decryption threats from quantum computing. This development, confirmed via official sources like nileex.io and github.com, represents a notable Layer 1 security enhancement. The report emphasizes its relevance within the current market focus on stablecoins. Crucially, the upgrade is currently active only on the testnet, not the TRON mainnet. While providing a verified data point for the market to weigh, the article cautions that this single development should be considered alongside broader market factors and does not guarantee any specific price action. It stands as a snapshot of ongoing protocol development.

bitcoinist1 h fa

TRON Nile Testnet Deploys Quantum-Resistant Signature Cryptography

bitcoinist1 h fa

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

The BIS report, "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins," highlights that the primary risks of stablecoins extend beyond potential de-pegging. It argues that the core challenge is whether stablecoins can be integrated into a financial system that is identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable. While acknowledging efficiency gains like faster payments and programmability, BIS emphasizes that money requires an institutional framework—including legal certainty, liquidity support, and financial integrity controls—which many stablecoins currently lack. The report details compliance risks, noting that while blockchain transactions are transparent, address visibility does not equate to identity or purpose clarity. This creates a systemic risk as pseudonymity, non-custodial wallets, and cross-chain bridges can undermine AML/CFT controls. Furthermore, these risks can spill over into the traditional financial system through on- and off-ramps. The future direction, per BIS, is not to prohibit innovation but to embed regulatory rules—such as identity verification and transaction screening—directly into the technological infrastructure of tokenized finance. The key takeaway for compliance is that any new financial instrument must clearly address questions of customer identification, transaction monitoring, accountability, and cross-border rule consistency to be viable as a mainstream payment tool.

marsbit1 h fa

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

marsbit1 h fa

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

When Silicon Valley Giants Turn to Chinese AI Models to Cut Costs A surprising trend is emerging: major U.S. tech companies are significantly reducing AI costs by switching to Chinese models. Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, reportedly halved its AI spending after migrating to China's GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7 models, despite increasing usage. They achieved this through a sophisticated three-part strategy: implementing an automatic routing system to select the most cost-effective model per task, boosting cache hit rates from 5% to 60% to reuse computations, and employing "context engineering" to provide AI with more precise, less cluttered information. They are not alone. AI startup Lindy switched from Claude to DeepSeek, saving millions, while Snowflake's tests found GLM-5.2 solved 66% of coding tasks compared to Claude Opus's 67%—but at a fraction of the cost (output pricing is 5-7 times lower). While the top Western models may offer slightly better stability, the massive price differential is leading many businesses to reconsider their value proposition. This shift signals a deeper change in the AI industry, moving beyond pure performance benchmarks to a fierce cost competition. As pressure mounts, even OpenAI and Anthropic have begun slashing prices. For users, this means more choices, lower costs, and a crucial lesson: using multiple models based on task complexity, optimizing with caching, and keeping contexts lean are now key to leveraging AI efficiently and affordably.

marsbit1 h fa

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

marsbit1 h fa

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The real risks of stablecoins go beyond "depegging" The BIS report "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins" argues that while stablecoins and tokenization offer efficiency gains, their primary risk lies in fitting into an identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable financial system. Money's trust stems not just from technology but from institutional arrangements: a common unit of account, guaranteed redemption at par, liquidity support, regulatory frameworks, and financial integrity requirements. Stablecoins, operating on permissionless blockchains with pseudo-anonymity and non-custodial wallets, create systemic compliance gaps: unclear customer identity, incomplete fund origins, unexplained transaction purposes, fragmented cross-chain paths, and ambiguous liability. On-chain transparency does not equal compliance transparency. Public addresses don't reveal identity or intent. While blockchain analytics aid law enforcement, they cannot replace routine, large-scale AML/CFT controls. Effective compliance requires a closed-loop process encompassing customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, investigation, reporting, and audit. Stablecoin risks are not confined to the blockchain; they re-enter the traditional financial system via on/off-ramps, exchanges, and payment institutions. This forces banks to monitor client accounts for activity linked to virtual assets. The future direction is not to prohibit innovation but to embed rules into the technology. Tokenized finance should integrate with the existing two-tier monetary system, embedding compliance—like customer identification, pre-transaction screening, and auditable data trails—directly into the transaction flow. For compliance professionals, the key takeaway is that any new financial instrument must answer core questions: Who identifies the customer? Who monitors transactions? Who handles exceptions? Who is liable? Compliance is not the antithesis of innovation but the essential infrastructure for its sustainable growth.

链捕手1 h fa

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片