加密早报：中美再次暂停实施 24% 的关税 90 天，Bullish 拟扩大 IPO 规模至最高 9.9 亿美元

深潮Pubblicato 2025-08-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-08-12

Terraform Labs联合创始人Do Kwon或将在美国认罪。

作者：深潮 TechFlow

昨日市场动态

中美再次暂停实施24%的关税90天

中美斯德哥尔摩经贸会谈联合声明：一、美国将继续修改2025年4月2日第14257号行政令中规定的对中国商品（包括香港特别行政区和澳门特别行政区商品）加征从价关税的实施，自2025年8月12日起再次暂停实施24%的关税90天，同时保留按该行政令规定对这些商品加征的剩余10%的关税。二、中国将继续（一）修改税委会公告2025年第4号规定的对美国商品加征的从价关税的实施，自2025年8月12日起再次暂停实施24%的关税90天，同时保留对这些商品加征的剩余10%的关税；并（二）根据日内瓦联合声明的商定，采取或者维持必要措施，暂停或取消针对美国的非关税反制措施。（金十）

特朗普媒体科技集团：比特币 ETF 将于今年晚些时候推出

据金十数据报道，特朗普媒体科技集团称，比特币 ETF 将于今年晚些时候推出。

此前消息，特朗普媒体科技集团今日披露提交比特币ETF修正注册声明。

Terraform Labs联合创始人Do Kwon或将在美国认罪

据The Block报道，纽约南区联邦法院文件显示，Terraform Labs联合创始人Do Kwon可能于周二上午改变原有立场并认罪。此前，Do Kwon因算法稳定币Terra USD（UST）崩盘事件，于2023年3月被美国检方指控多项罪名，包括欺诈阴谋、商品欺诈、电信欺诈、证券欺诈、市场操纵和洗钱等。

法官Paul Engelmayer在排期令中表示，"法院已获知被告可能改变辩诉"，并要求被告准备好就认罪罪名作出陈述。Do Kwon此前于今年1月对所有指控表示不认罪。

彭博社：Bullish 拟扩大 IPO 规模至最高 9.9 亿美元，上调目标估值至 48.2 亿美元

据彭博社报道，加密货币交易所 Bullish 上调首次公开募股（IPO）规模最高至 9.9 亿美元，此前为 6.29 亿美元；目标估值提升至 48.2 亿美元，此前的目标估算为 42 亿美元；拟发行数量从 2,030 万股增至 3,000 万股。

Uniswap 基金会提议采用 DUNA DAO 框架，为开启协议费用开关铺路

据 The Block 报道，去中心化交易所 Uniswap 基金会提议为其治理组织设立新的法律实体，采用怀俄明州的去中心化非法人非营利组织（DUNA）框架。该提案将为新实体 DUNI 分配价值 1650 万美元的 UNI 代币，用于支付过往税务和法律防御预算。

Uniswap 基金会法律总顾问 Brian Nistler 表示，采用 DUNA 框架将为开启协议费用开关创造条件。据报道称，新实体不改变Uniswap协议、代币或治理结构，且费用收入无法直接分配给UNI持有者。

金融科技公司Stripe与Paradigm合作开发支付区块链Tempo

据Fortune报道，金融科技巨头Stripe正在与加密风投公司Paradigm合作开发名为Tempo的区块链，该项目定位为高性能、专注支付的Layer 1区块链，并兼容以太坊的编程语言。

Tempo目前处于隐秘开发阶段，团队规模为5人。此前，Stripe以11亿美元收购稳定币基础设施公司Bridge，并收购加密钱包开发商Privy，进一步布局稳定币技术。

Arthur Hayes大举买入以太坊生态代币

据链上分析师 Onchain Lens（@OnchainLens）监测，BitMEX联合创始人Arthur Hayes在过去19小时内进行了以太坊生态代币购买，其中包括：

  • 1,500枚ETH，价值约634万美元

  • 424,860枚LDO，价值约56.3万美元

  • 420,000枚ETHFI，价值约51.1万美元

  • 92,005枚PENDLE，价值约50.4万美元

蚂蚁集团辟谣稀土人民币稳定币合作传闻

据财联社报道，针对网络上流传的"蚂蚁集团与中国人民银行、中国稀土集团共建全球首个稀土人民币稳定币"的说法，蚂蚁集团正式回应称从未与相关机构有此类计划，并提醒公众注意甄别信息，防范风险。

Fundamental Global 宣布已购入 47,331 枚 ETH，目标为持有以太坊网络 10% 份额

据 Globe Newswire 报道，纳斯达克上市公司 Fundamental Global Inc（股票代码：FGNX，FGNXP）宣布已购入 47,331 个 ETH，单价为 4,228.40 美元。该公司表示已将此前宣布的 2 亿美元私募所得资金全部用于购买 ETH。

公司数字资产部门 CEO Maja Vujinovic 表示，公司计划继续推动 ETH 作为储备资产的全球采用，目标是持有以太坊网络 10% 的权益。该公司已与加密货币托管机构 Anchorage Digital 和资产管理公司 Galaxy 建立合作关系。

美股上市金融科技公司 ALT5 Sigma 宣布进行 15 亿美元融资以启动 WLFI 财库战略

据 Investing.com 报道，美股上市金融科技公司 ALT5 Sigma Corporation宣布进行总额15亿美元的注册直接发行及同步私募配售，用于启动World Liberty Financial（WLFI）的财库战略。

其中，WLFI 以代币认购 1 亿股，剩余 1 亿股面向机构投资者发行。交易完成后，ALT5 将持有总供应量约 7.5% WLFI 代币。同时，WLFI CEO Zach Witkoff 将出任董事长，Eric Trump 加入董事会。

美股上市公司 Safety Shot 宣布将启动 BONK 财库战略

据 Stocktitan 报道，纳斯达克上市公司 Safety Shot 宣布与 Bonk 创始贡献者建立战略联盟，启动 BONK 财库策略。据悉该公司将获得价值 2500 万美元的 BONK 代币，作为交换将发行可转换为普通股、总价值 3500 万美元的优先股。

行情动态

推荐阅读

揭秘币圈财富神话，他们如何赚到人生第一个 1000 万？

本文介绍了币圈最富有的13位大佬如何通过独特的路径赚取人生第一桶金，并总结了三种主要的造富模式。这些模式包括开设交易所、长期持有比特币以及构建生态系统。此外，文章还为普通人提供了一些从币圈大佬身上学习的建议。

Sui 元老再创业，现实世界区块链 Rialo 是什么？

本文介绍了由 Subzero Labs 开发的区块链项目 Rialo，旨在通过原生连接现实世界的功能，降低区块链技术的使用门槛，使开发者能够像 Web2 开发一样轻松构建应用。其创新定位跳出了传统 Layer1、Layer2 或 Layer3 框架，并通过原生整合现实服务、支持多种身份登录方式以及优化开发体验等特点，试图解决区块链与现实世界脱节的问题。Rialo 获得了 2000 万美元种子轮融资，团队成员背景丰富，技术架构结合 RISC-V 和 Solana VM 兼容性，目标是提高区块链的效率和用户友好性。

Web3 合规漫谈：币圈收益是否需要纳税？

本文围绕加密货币税务合规问题展开讨论，探讨了全球范围内对加密资产的监管趋势、跨境税务安排、以及个人和企业在币圈中的税务筹划空间。作者和对谈人结合实际案例分析了加密行业中纳税逻辑的复杂性，并对未来Web3税制模型进行了畅想。

这个 Meme 发射台花费近 80 万美元买了一顶 30 美元的帽子？

本文讨论了Bags平台创始人花费约80万美元购买了一顶价值30美元的粉色毛帽，此举旨在提升Meme代币$BTH的市场价值。

从历史来看 401(k) 养老金引入 Crypto 资产

本文探讨了美国总统特朗普签署行政令，允许401(k)退休储蓄计划投资加密资产，标志着加密市场的国家级背书，释放推动市场成熟的信号。养老金投资策略从固定收益逐步转向权益资产，历史变革与当前引入加密资产的趋势存在相似性。加密资产进入养老金计划相当于“囤币”，成为一种战略储备，对加密市场是巨大利好。

Letture associate

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

Three Years Later: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's launch, I made 20 predictions about its future. Now, in mid-2026, I've used AI agents to fact-check each one against the latest data. Overall, most major directional forecasts were correct, with only one outright error (incorrectly stating GPT-4 had 100 trillion parameters). Key successes included predicting that RAG and retrieval architectures would become the standard for handling knowledge and hallucinations, that natural language interfaces (LUI) would create a massive new industry layer beyond the models themselves, and that China would develop viable large language models, significantly closing the performance gap with Western counterparts within about three years. Predictions about the absence of mass unemployment, the rise of a new "robot network" for agent communication, and ChatGPT not possessing consciousness also held true in their core arguments. However, the "devil was in the details." Errors frequently involved specific numbers, timelines, or overlooking distributional effects. I tended to overestimate the speed of adoption (e.g., for agent networks) while underestimating the ultimate scale of capabilities or costs (e.g., AI winning IMO gold without tools, or the extreme capital required for frontier models). Other misjudgments included: underestimating how AI would reinforce, not dissolve, information filter bubbles; incorrectly assuming AI-generated content would easily circumvent copyright (it has instead triggered record-breaking settlements); and misidentifying where value would be captured (it accrued overwhelmingly to the compute layer, like Nvidia, not just the application or model layers). Key lessons from reviewing these predictions are: 1) Directional and mechanistic insights are far more reliable than precise numbers or absolute statements. 2) There's a consistent bias to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude. 3) Errors often lie in missing distributional impacts within a generally correct aggregate trend. 4) Predictions phrased with nuance and caveats aged the best. 5) Some fundamental debates (e.g., on machine consciousness or the ultimate value chain) remain unresolved even after three years. This exercise is less about scoring the past and more about establishing rules for clearer thinking about the next three years of AI.

marsbit1 h fa

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

marsbit1 h fa

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手3 h fa

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手3 h fa

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbit4 h fa

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbit4 h fa

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbit4 h fa

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbit4 h fa

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbit6 h fa

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbit6 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片