How Blockchain Could Have Saved the Fed and US Agencies From Job Numbers Fiasco

ccn.comPubblicato 2025-08-07Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-08-10

Key Takeaways
  • Following the recent jobs market drama, Chamath Palihapitiya suggested using blockchain for jobs data via payroll uploads, error checks, and a live feed.
  • The BLS initially reported strong job growth in June, but cut gains by 258,000, the steepest two-month drop since 1979.
  • Mark Cuban questioned the practicality and cost of a blockchain-based system, while Biden administration officials defended the integrity of the BLS.

When the U.S. government revealed that June’s strong jobs report had been revised into the red, wiping out hundreds of thousands of positions from the official tally, financial markets reeled.

The fallout led to President Trump dramatically firing the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner last week, accusing Erika McEntarfer of “rigging” the data.

Meanwhile, billionaire Chamath Palihapitiya entered the conversation with an idea that he felt could have prevented all of the drama: putting America’s jobs data on the blockchain.

Job Number Crisis

The BLS initially reported that the U.S. added approximately 147,000 non-farm jobs in June, massively surpassing expectations.

However, just two months later, that figure was slashed to a mere 14,000 after unprecedented downward revisions totaling approximately 258,000 jobs across May and June, the steepest two-month drop since the non-pandemic era began in 1979.

The revised data revealed only 73,000 new jobs in July, signaling that the labor market’s resilience was perhaps an illusion.

These seismic corrections caught economists and experts off guard and triggered a new feud between Trump and yet another government agency.

“We need accurate Jobs Numbers,” Trump said in a Truth Social post.

“I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.”

“Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate; they can’t be manipulated for political purposes.”

Jobs on the Blockchain

As the jobs-data controversy swirled, billionaire venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya argued that the U.S. needed a wholesale rebuild of how employment numbers are collected and reported.

Palihapitiya took to X, claiming that the BLS system was “brittle” and “sloppy,” and called for a new “oracle-like data provider” for this critical information.

“Bottom line is that BLS isn’t so much conspiratorial as it is inadequate in its approach,” he wrote on X. “They are all over the place and add little directional signal. They constantly revise and in both directions.”

“The sampling techniques they use are brittle and don’t work for a large and dynamic economy like the U.S.,” he added.

Palihapitiya said Trump was right to fire the head of the BLS because “she ran a critical aspect of the U.S. economic machinery in an unpredictable, haphazard, and sloppy way.”

“There needs to be a new, oracle-like data provider for this critical information,” he added.

However, not everyone was convinced this was the answer. Famed investor and Shark Tank star Mark Cuban fired back at the idea:

“Did you even read what you wrote? Are you suggesting a crypto-like oracle that outputs employment data, every month, on the same day, be required for every business?

“Who is gonna pay for the implementations? And of course there are gov agencies that have to respond as well. What do you have in mind for them?

“Do you really think the implementation, maintenance, and response timing and rates will be better than the current survey?”

Chamath countered Cuban with a three-tier proposal on how he believed taking the jobs market to the blockchain could succeed:

  • Require all payroll providers (known through tax withholding records) to upload a flat file to an endpoint.
  • Run a model against uploads to look for any potential errors.
  • Publish a real-time feed — with the total annual cost split among licensees.

The idea was met with a fairly negative response, with many commenters siding with Cuban and claiming Chamath was “cozying up to Trump.”

Economists also agree on at least part of Cuban’s critique, the biggest problem in the recent debacle wasn’t tampering, it was the shrinking survey response rates and outdated collection methods.

Chamath’s Potential For Blockchain

Under Chamath Palihapitiya’s proposal, payroll providers would automatically upload anonymized employment data in real time, allowing for instant verification and reducing reliance on delayed, sample-based surveys that are prone to large revisions.

Because blockchain records are immutable, any changes to the data would be traceable and would eliminate any suspicion of political manipulation.

A real-time feed could also provide policymakers and the public with up-to-date labor market information, reducing the shock of dramatic revisions seen recently.

Critics, however, warn that implementing this at scale would be expensive and too complex from a system which already works.

One X user wrote: “The entire methodology is publicly available on the BLS website.

“Estimation, Revisions, everything. All you have to do is read. Suddenly it’s garbage because you wanna be cozied up with the President. Vacuous shill behavior.”

White House Defends BLS

The jobs report sent Trump on a tirade of accusations, claiming the commissioner faked jobs numbers “before the Election to try and boost Kamala’s chances of Victory.”

All of Trump’s accusations were presented without any evidence.

Members of the federal government rushed to defend McEntarfer, who has worked in the White House for the past two decades.

Speaking to NBC, Labor Secretary during the Biden administration Julie Su said :

“The work is done largely by expert career staff who do their jobs with care and pride.”

Meanwhile, Labor Department Chief of Staff Daniel Koh took to X to claim:

“Nobody is faking numbers.”

“Downward revisions aren’t scandal — they’re science,” he added.

Koh said the agency worked closely with a Trump-appointed commissioner and “never doubted the data, even with bad news.”

“Respecting the truth isn’t optional. It’s the job,” he said.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Letture associate

Solana Expands Validator Power With Launch of On-Chain Governance

Solana has formally launched its on-chain governance system, empowering token holders and validators with a more open and decentralized way to influence major protocol decisions. Governance debates and voting are now conducted entirely on-chain using the new Solana Governance Proposals (SGP) framework, supported by stake-weighted voting and cryptographic verification. Validators with at least 100,000 SOL in delegated stake can submit an SGP. To proceed to a formal vote, a proposal must first gain support from at least 15% of the network's total staked SOL, ensuring only ideas with significant backing move forward. SGPs serve a distinct purpose from the technical Solana Improvement Documents (SIMDs). While SIMDs focus on *how* to implement protocol upgrades, SGPs determine *whether* the broader ecosystem believes a proposal should proceed, via an on-chain, stake-weighted vote. This separation allows core developers to continue building effectively while reserving community-wide votes for impactful decisions. A key feature grants delegators greater control: they can now override their validator's governance vote. If a validator votes against a delegator's preference or abstains, the delegator can cast a vote directly using their own stake weight through Solana's governance portal. The voting process is secured using Merkle proofs to verify participant stakes against an on-chain consensus snapshot. With this implementation, Solana aims to broaden community participation in governance without hindering development, combining decentralized decision-making with efficient protocol evolution.

TheNewsCrypto20 min fa

Solana Expands Validator Power With Launch of On-Chain Governance

TheNewsCrypto20 min fa

Trillion-Won Bet on Semiconductors: Is South Korea Really Panicking This Time?

**Summary:** South Korea, traditionally adept at "counter-cyclical" investments during industry downturns, has launched an unprecedented trillion-dollar (approximately 6.4 trillion RMB) semiconductor investment plan during a current AI-driven boom. This shift signals deep strategic anxiety, driven by the rapid rise of China's memory chip challengers. The article traces this dynamic through the history of East Asian semiconductor competition. In the 1980s, Japan used a "national system + industrial capital" model to surpass the US in DRAM, only to be overtaken in the 1990s by South Korea employing the same aggressive, efficiency-focused tactics—most notably massive, loss-tolerant investments during downturns to crush competitors like Japan's Elpida. Now, China's memory giants, Yangtze Memory (YMTC) and ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), are employing a strikingly similar playbook. Starting from near-zero a decade ago, they've used a combination of government-backed capital, strategic technology acquisition (e.g., CXMT leveraging Qimonda's legacy), and innovative architectural leaps (e.g., YMTC's Xtacking) to achieve rapid technological catch-up. Crucially, during the severe industry downturn of 2023, while Korean and US giants cut production, the Chinese firms expanded capacity and competed on price, rapidly gaining global market share (reaching ~11% in NAND and ~7.67% in DRAM by 2025). South Korea's current massive investment, therefore, is a defensive move born of fear. The historical pattern suggests that once a technological gap closes, scale and integrated supply chain advantages—areas where China holds significant potential—can determine the leader. Having used counter-cyclical strategies to become the incumbent, South Korea now faces the prospect of a formidable challenger using those very same tactics. This investment marks not just a bet on the AI cycle, but the opening chapter in a new battle for dominance in the memory industry.

marsbit29 min fa

Trillion-Won Bet on Semiconductors: Is South Korea Really Panicking This Time?

marsbit29 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片