Mining Ban Sparks Negative Reactions From Iran’s Crypto Community

newsbtcPubblicato 2022-06-27Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-06-27

Introduzione

The company’s spokesman, Mostafa Rajabi Mashhadi, has been quoted as stating that the measure should help reduce the heavy load on the national grid during the peak season.

Mining Ban Sparks Negative Reactions From Iran’s Crypto Community

The recently reintroduced seasonal ban on cryptocurrency mining has provoked backlash from the local crypto community. This week, the country’s power distribution company ordered miners to suspend activities citing electricity shortages during the hot summer months.

Restrictions on Crypto Mining Are Ousting Iran From Global Coin Minting Industry, Critics Say

After last year crypto miners were forced to deal with interruptions in power supply on more than one occasion, the Iran Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Company (Tavanir) has told them to halt operations again, until the end of this summer. The utility is citing expected electricity shortages in the next three months of hot weather, when demand will spike due to rising consumption for cooling.

The company’s spokesman, Mostafa Rajabi Mashhadi, has been quoted as stating that the measure should help reduce the heavy load on the national grid during the peak season. According to a report by the Iranian business news outlet Way2pay, stakeholders have objected to the move, insisting that it’s unwarranted and will hurt Iran’s crypto mining industry, as in 2021.

The power deficit and the frequent blackouts were partially blamed on the increased power usage for mining, both legal and illegal, and last May licensed miners were ordered to shut down. They were allowed to resume operations in September, but then again asked to unplug their equipment to help alleviate the shortages in the cold winter months, when demand of energy increases for heating purposes.

Last year’s multiple shutdowns hit the miners hard and Iran’s share in the global hashrate fell to just 0.12%, according to the Bitcoin Mining Map of the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, effectively ousting Iran from the planet’s crypto mining industry. The similar events now have again provoked numerous reactions from the space and warnings that Iran is lagging behind its competitors.

Iranian Miners Have Few Remaining Options to Choose From

Some Iranians believe that removing the cryptocurrency miners from the equation would have little effect on the power supply as the legal mining facilities account for a relatively small share of the network’s load. The report notes that it’s unclear how effective the ban on authorized mining will eventually turn out to be.

It’s also unclear why all miners across the country are supposed to cease activities as in reality, some crypto farms operate in parts of the country that do not experience electricity shortages. Another objection comes down to the questions why only miners should be disconnected from the grid and why this should happen so suddenly.

Iran legalized crypto mining as an industrial activity in 2019. Since then, dozens of companies have applied for a license from the Ministry of Industry. Tavanir’s executive responsible for the mining sector, Mohammad Khodadadi, reminded that the government resolution explicitly states that miners are not allowed to buy electricity during peak times of consumption. Their contracts contain a similar clause as well, he added.

According to Way2pay, Iranian crypto miners have limited options now when it’s obvious that the country’s power network can no longer meet their needs. The first is to simply wait until the authorities lift the ban. Another one is to use alternative fuels by installing diesel generators or to rely on generation from renewable energy sources. The last resort is to go underground and continue to mint digital coins illegally, on their own risk.

Letture associate

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手1 h fa

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手1 h fa

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit1 h fa

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit1 h fa

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinist5 h fa

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinist5 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片