Trustless bridges: A much-needed solution to the security risks of blockchain bridges

cryptoslatePubblicato 2022-06-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-06-24

Introduzione

Truly trustless bridges, which do not require users to place trust in a centralized or federated group of operators.

As an increasing number of blockchain protocols are launched, each with its own efficiencies, benefits, and areas of focus, there is increased interest from investors and users to move assets and liquidity between them. The implementation of blockchain bridges – also known as token bridges – is essential to create interoperability and allow the exchange and flow of digital assets, enabling greater liquidity between blockchains.

However, with the rush to address the pressure to enable cross-chain liquidity, the security technology underpinning many blockchain bridges was initially relatively weak. Many bridges have a single trusted operator with the power to intercept or intervene in token transfer.

Truly trustless bridges, which do not require users to place trust in a centralized or federated group of operators, can solve the urgent issues around security for bridges and their users. Trustless bridge solutions are critical for the long-term vitality of bridges and blockchains themselves.

Addressing the issue

The main issue with low-security blockchain bridges is that they compromise the benefits of using a transparent, decentralized system, which is what makes blockchain so open, efficient, transparent, and special in the first place. The Wormhole bridge attack in February and the Ronin bridge heist in March compromised a combined $1bn in assets, illustrating what can go wrong when bridges are not architected securely.

Generally, bridges work by locking tokens on one blockchain and minting new equivalent tokens on another, which ensures that tokens do not leave their respective blockchains during a transaction. The tokens are typically deposited into a bridge smart contract on the first blockchain, where they are locked and will be unlocked when the transaction is reversed. The pools of locked tokens represent a honey pot for any hacker, and when compromised, the value of any unbacked wrapped tokens on the destination chain is called into question.

Whilst this issue was raised at Algorand’s latest Decipher conference in November 2021, the extremity of the subsequent Wormhole and Ronin bridge attacks, alongside the fact that the value of assets held on blockchain bridges, has risen to more than $32bn since the beginning of 2021, highlights that rapid action must be taken to implement a more secure bridging solution for the blockchain industry.

Providing a solution

Trustless bridge solutions are the most secure way of designing and building these bridges as they don’t require the participants involved to know or trust each other or a third party for the system to be secure.

For instance, Applied Blockchain and Algorand are collaborating to develop a trustless cross-chain bridge that will initially utilize the security properties of Intel’s hardware security enclave (SGX) and will later use a new cryptography feature called state proofs when this becomes available in Algorand. State proofs are an immutable series of proofs that verify the status of assets held on its blockchain. This enables smart contracts on the target chain to process transactions from the Algorand chain.

Trustless cross-chain technology seek to eliminate the need for intermediaries or third parties to connecting two blockchain networks, thereby improving interoperability and upholding the principle of blockchain technology’s decentralization.

State proofs will help connect Algorand to the broader blockchain world, enabling users to complete cross-chain transactions efficiently, cost-effectively, and securely. Therefore, they will also provide a blueprint for other cross-chain solutions looking to close the security loopholes of more centralized systems.

Next-generation security measures such as the state proofs under development at Algorand (ALGO) will be critical for the long-term viability of blockchain bridge projects. They will solve an urgent security issue and will therefore encourage both users and investors to use these solutions to transfer their assets across chains.

Letture associate

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手1 h fa

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手1 h fa

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit1 h fa

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit1 h fa

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinist5 h fa

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinist5 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片