Роберт Кийосаки: $107 000 за биткоин — это не дорого

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2024-04-30Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-06-30

Миллиардер и автор книги о личных финансах «Богатый папа, бедный папа» Роберт Кийосаки (Robert Kiyosaki) заявил, что курс, по которому сейчас торгуется биткоин, — это не так уж дорого, если учесть, что в будущем первая криптовалюта сможет достичь отметки $1 млн.

Кийосаки поделился с подписчиками размышлениями о вложениях в криптовалюту. Инвестор рассказал, что вышел на рынок биткоина сравнительно поздно, купив первую монету за $6000. По словам писателя, в то время это тоже считалось дорого, а теперь, когда биткоин торгуется на уровне $107 000, Кийосаки сожалеет, что не купил больше биткоинов по старой цене.

Миллиардер заверил, что, несмотря на высокую цену актива, он продолжает инвестировать в биткоин, учитывая потенциальную долгосрочную прибыль. Кийосаки уверен, что если биткоин будет торговаться по $1 млн за монету, он снова будет упрекать себя, что не купил больше криптовалюты по текущему курсу. Поэтому Кийосаки посоветовал долгосрочным инвесторам не стоять в стороне, а начинать накапливать сатоши или, по мере возможностей, целые BTC.

«Что такое дорого? Я поздно купил биткоин. Я ждал слишком долго... потому что не понимал сегодняшние современные деньги. Мой разум опять говорит: “Это дорого“. Но я все равно покупаю больше. Даже если сегодня вы можете позволить себе всего один сатоши, думаю, через пять лет вы будете говорить: “Я бы хотел купить больше“. Достигнет ли биткоин $1 млн? Я не знаю. Я знаю, что при текущей цене биткоин бесценен», — написал Кийосаки в соцсети Х.

В мае Кийосаки заявил, что даже 0,01 биткоина могут через два года сделать человека очень богатым. По мнению инвестора, долгосрочная покупка биткоина — самый легкий способ достичь финансовой независимости.

Letture associate

Why Did Codex and ChatGPT Merge? What's Next for Codex? OpenAI Core Leader Answers Everything

In 2026, OpenAI's Codex saw explosive growth, with weekly active users surging over 5x to 5 million since January, driven largely by the February launch of its desktop app. Codex desktop lead Andrew Ambrosino explains key shifts behind its evolution. A core change is the inversion of development costs: implementation is now cheap, while curation and taste—judging which of many AI-generated prototypes is valuable—have become the new scarcities. Ambrosino defines taste as a blend of aesthetics, systems thinking, direction, and semantic coherence in interaction. He notes AI still struggles with design because evaluating it requires human cultural context and abstract reasoning about how components relate—capabilities beyond current models. Timing is critical: the same Codex app would have failed months earlier; success hinges on the model's capabilities at launch. Roles are blurring within his team, with engineers, designers, and PMs overlapping significantly. However, Ambrosino cautions against eliminating specialized roles entirely, as each field retains deep expertise. On AI-assisted development, the focus has shifted from measuring code written by AI to distinguishing between supervised and unsupervised generation. A current challenge is teaching models to simplify code, not just add complexity. The merger of Codex and ChatGPT stems from observed user behavior: non-developers adopted Codex for general knowledge work despite its developer-centric interface. This revealed a collapsing boundary between specialized tools and universal assistants. The vision is a "home base" that orchestrates tasks across external professional tools (like Excel or Premiere Pro) via connectors, rather than rebuilding everything internally. An internal example showed Codex helping edit video by interacting with Premiere Pro's files and even writing a plugin for it. The future direction is a unified, extensible platform that serves as a central hub for automating and managing work across any specialized tool the user employs.

marsbit11 min fa

Why Did Codex and ChatGPT Merge? What's Next for Codex? OpenAI Core Leader Answers Everything

marsbit11 min fa

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: A Nuanced Competitive Reshuffle The launch of OUSD, a new stablecoin initiative, has complex implications for the stablecoin market. For Circle (CRCL), the initial 15-20% stock drop reflects legitimate competitive concerns but is not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantages. A potential restructuring or termination of its Coinbase partnership could even double its net revenue in the short term, providing more competitive freedom. However, OUSD, backed by Stripe's engineering and product strengths, could become the default stablecoin within the Stripe ecosystem for new adopters, challenging USDC's position. OUSD does not solve the core barrier for corporate adoption: it remains a credit exposure to its issuer (likely a Bridge-related entity), which, like Circle, is not an investment-grade entity. Large banks and asset managers could still capture the most lucrative enterprise use cases. Circle must accelerate its payment/fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. For Tether, OUSD targets a different market segment. Tether will continue focusing on distribution channels not prioritized by Stripe or Circle. Its market share may decline over time, but within a significantly growing total market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the key selling points of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may diminish as frameworks mature. This poses a more existential challenge, explaining Paxos's recent shift back to its brokerage-as-a-service business.

marsbit3 h fa

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片