Произраильские хакеры заявили о взломе иранской криптобиржи на $82 млн

RBK-cryptoPubblicato 2025-06-18Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-06-18

Взломщики назвали биржу «ключевым инструментом иранского режима для финансирования терроризма и обхода санкций»

Одну из крупнейших иранских криптобирж Nobitex взломали и украли почти $82 млн. Ответственность за взлом взяла произраильская хакерская группа Gonjeshke Darande.

Первым об инциденте сообщил известный в криптосообществе детектив под псевдонимом ZachXBT. По его данным, из связанных с биржей кошельков в сети Tron вывели $48,5 млн, дополнительно средства были украдены в биткоинах, мемкоине Dogecoin и других токенах.

Средства отправили на четыре адреса с провокационными подписями, в начале публичного ключа одного из кошельков зашифрована фраза Fuck IRGC Terrorists NoBitex (TKFuckiRGCTerroristsNoBiTEXy2r7mNX). Такие адреса создаются с помощью генераторов vanity-адресов — программ, которые подбирают закрытый ключ до тех пор, пока публичный адрес не начнется с заданной последовательности символов.

Nobitex вскоре подтвердила, что был скомпрометирован доступ к ее горячим кошелькам и системе уведомлений. Все подозрительные операции остановлены, ведется внутреннее расследование. Биржа заявила, что средства пользователей в холодных кошельках не пострадали, убытки будут компенсированы из страхового фонда и резервов компании. Сайт и приложение временно недоступны.

Телеграм-канал «РБК-Крипто» — подпишитесь и будьте в курсе самых главных и актуальных новостей о криптовалюте.

Присоединяйтесь к форуму «РБК-Крипто» в Telegram для обсуждения новостей и тенденций криптомира.

Ответственность за взлом взяла хакерская группировка Gonjeshke Darande («Хищный воробей»), которую детектив называет «произраильской». В заявлении в X они назвали Nobitex «ключевым инструментом иранского режима для финансирования терроризма и обхода санкций» и пообещали в течение 24 часов опубликовать внутреннюю информацию и исходный код биржи.

Nobitex была основана в 2017 году. По данным агрегатора irancrypto.market, суточный объем торгов на ней составляет более 7 квадриллиона иранских риалов ($168 млн), почти половина которого приходится на пару с биткоином.

Топ-10 крупнейших стейблкоинов. Простые карточки

«Пережить ночь без ликвидации». Подборка горячих тем с Форума РБК Крипто

X заблокировала аккаунт мемкоин-платформы Pump.Fun и ряда криптопроектов

Letture associate

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

**Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence** Artificial intelligence (AI) is an era filled with paradoxes, which we navigate as we advance. **1. The Prediction Paradox** AI experts, from pioneers like Marvin Minsky to contemporary figures like Geoffrey Hinton and Demis Hassabis, have a history of inaccurate forecasts regarding AI's capabilities and timelines, such as achieving human-level machine intelligence or surpassing radiologists. Predictions about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) vary wildly between optimistic entrepreneurs and skeptical academics, highlighting the inherent unpredictability of technological futures. **2. The Employment Quantification Paradox** Despite numerous studies from institutions like the OECD, IMF, and McKinsey attempting to quantify AI's impact on jobs, estimates of affected employment range from 0.4% to 67%, revealing vast inconsistencies. This paradox arises because isolating AI's effect from other economic, social, and technological factors is virtually impossible, and forecasts depend on static assumptions about a dynamically evolving technology. **3. The Productivity Paradox** While AI is a transformative General Purpose Technology, significant productivity growth has not yet materialized in major economies like the EU and has only matched historical averages in the US. This disconnect between rapid innovation and slow productivity gains, reminiscent of the "Solow Paradox" from the computer age, is often explained by time lags. History shows it takes decades for such technologies to diffuse and trigger complementary innovations that boost productivity. **4. The Data Value Paradox** Data is hailed as the "new oil" and critical for AI, yet its economic value is paradoxical. Its worth is realized only in use, not in straightforward trade. Despite policy emphasis and initiatives for data asset recognition on corporate balance sheets in China, the monetized value remains negligible—accounting for only about 0.06% of major telecom operators' total assets—highlighting the gap between perceived utility and financial valuation. **5. The Industrial Revolution Paradox** For decades, nearly every major new technology, from the internet and nanotechnology to blockchain and now AI, has been proclaimed as the driver of a "Fourth Industrial Revolution." This constant reassignment suggests prior labels were premature. True industrial revolutions are typically identified in hindsight, not in real-time. Furthermore, the coexistence of such a proclaimed transformative revolution with ongoing economic crises would be historically anomalous. Whether AI truly defines a new industrial revolution remains a narrative for the future to decide.

marsbitAdesso

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

marsbitAdesso

Experts Warn of Mass Crypto Hacks Using AI Agents

Experts warn that AI agents could dramatically lower the cost and scale of attacks against cryptocurrency holders. Speaking at the Wyoming Blockchain Symposium, industry figures noted that automation allows malicious actors to simultaneously search for vulnerabilities in wallets, passwords, and networks across a vast number of potential victims. Ryan Kirkly, co-founder and CEO of Global Settlement Network, criticized the industry for often viewing autonomous agents only as beneficial tools while underestimating their offensive potential. Data from TRM Labs shows the crypto industry experienced a record 207 hacks in the first half of 2026, causing $972 million in losses, with the number doubling from the same period in 2025. Vice President of Technical Operations at Web3 Foundation, Bill Labun, agreed that the efficiency of autonomous systems also benefits attackers. While defenders like the Ethereum Foundation are using AI agents for security audits, the need for human verification remains high due to false positives. A major concern is granting AI agents direct access to financial tools and personal data. New services like MetaMask's Agent Wallet, which allows AI to manage assets within set limits, introduce risks such as prompt injection attacks. Panelists also highlighted risks from metadata leakage, which can compromise privacy even on private networks, and the unresolved issue of legal liability for an AI agent's autonomous and potentially irreversible actions. Lack of user trust, due to AI's tendency to "hallucinate" or generate incorrect information, was cited as a key barrier to widespread adoption.

cryptonews.ru1 min fa

Experts Warn of Mass Crypto Hacks Using AI Agents

cryptonews.ru1 min fa

American economic magazine Forbes stated that bitcoin could become a neutral reserve asset for the global economy!

American business and economic magazine Forbes has suggested that Bitcoin could potentially play a significant role as a neutral reserve asset in the global financial system. According to the publication, Bitcoin might offer an alternative to the growing debates surrounding the US dollar's status as the world's reserve currency and the current system's reliance on US government bonds. Forbes notes that the dollar's reserve status grants the US significant advantages but also highlights the inherent "Triffin dilemma," where the US struggles to balance its domestic economic needs with global demand for the reserve currency. The current system draws global capital to the US, allowing for cheaper imports but weakening domestic competitiveness and worsening the trade deficit. The post-gold standard system has been sustained by US bonds, yet fundamental contradictions remain. The magazine argues that stablecoins cannot fully address the reserve asset issue as they are largely backed by US Treasuries. While gold is a neutral reserve asset, it has limitations regarding mobility, verification, and transactional efficiency. In contrast, Bitcoin, with its fixed supply, lack of need for state credit guarantees, and ease of global verification and transfer, is presented as a potential next-generation neutral reserve asset. Forbes states that while the US dollar will continue to be used in international trade, Bitcoin could eventually assume the reserve asset role, reducing the global economy's dependence on any single country's debt instruments. The article also acknowledges that hurdles like price volatility and limited institutional adoption must be overcome. *This is not investment advice.

cryptonews.ru2 min fa

American economic magazine Forbes stated that bitcoin could become a neutral reserve asset for the global economy!

cryptonews.ru2 min fa

Cryptanalyst Spots Pattern Capable of Leading to Bitcoin Rise of 1000%

Crypto analyst Crypto Patel predicts that Bitcoin could surge by 1000% following the current market downturn, identifying a pattern he calls the "Bitcoin cycle scheme." He analyzed past cycles: the first saw a peak at $19,666, an 84% drop, then a rise to $69,000; the second involved a 77% drop before a climb to a record $126,000. The current cycle, with a peak at $126,000 and a subsequent 69% decline, fits the pattern of smaller corrections and higher peaks each time. Patel believes Bitcoin is nearing a zone that will become a bullish order block, triggering massive growth. He asserts the principle of repeatability "has never failed." However, experts like Scott Melker and Arthur Hayes argue Bitcoin's four-year cycle is no longer relevant. At the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading near $72,000, up 11.4% over 24 hours and nearly 12.1% over the week.

cryptonews.ru3 min fa

Cryptanalyst Spots Pattern Capable of Leading to Bitcoin Rise of 1000%

cryptonews.ru3 min fa

Surge over 269%, Did Yuan Yonggang Win Again by Betting on 'Optical Manufacturing Mother Machines'?

The stock price of Landun Optoelectronics (300862.SZ) has surged over 269%, driven by its announcement to acquire Lanchuang Technology, a manufacturer of high-end vacuum coating equipment used in producing key components (like TFF filters) for optical modules. This reflects a market shift towards investing in the upstream "industrial mother machines" of the booming AI and data center-driven optical module sector. Currently, the global market for such high-precision equipment, essential for manufacturing narrowband TFF filters in 800G/1.6T modules, is dominated by foreign companies like Germany's Bühler-Leybold and the US's Veeco, making domestic suppliers like Lanchuang scarce. The acquisition is part of the strategic expansion by the controlling shareholder, Yuan Yonggang, who is building a photonics portfolio across listed companies. This includes Dongshan Precision (a major optical module maker via its acquisition of Source Photonics) and Anfu Technology. While these moves have fueled significant market value growth, they also bring associated risks such as high debt from expansion, potential regulatory hurdles for the acquisition, and substantial goodwill. The market's enthusiasm underscores the focus on the critical, yet previously overlooked, equipment layer in the optical communication supply chain.

marsbit7 min fa

Surge over 269%, Did Yuan Yonggang Win Again by Betting on 'Optical Manufacturing Mother Machines'?

marsbit7 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片