美欧首脑首度通话后,特朗普将对欧加税时点延长至 7 月 9 日,欧盟承诺「迅速果断」推进谈判

marsbitPubblicato 2025-05-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-05-26

美欧贸易战又出现转折,在威胁对欧盟征收 50% 关税短短两天后,特朗普又改口。在与欧盟主席通话后,特朗普宣布将最后期限推迟,为双方贸易谈判争取了额外时间。

据央视新闻报道,当地时间 25 日,美国总统特朗普表示,欧盟请求将关税谈判期限延长至 7 月 9 日,他已同意这一请求。特朗普称,本次与欧盟就关税问题的谈话「非常愉快」。


23 日,特朗普在社交媒体发文称,他建议从 6 月 1 日开始对来自欧盟的商品征收 50% 的关税。他表示,欧盟成立的主要目的就是「在贸易上占美国的便宜」,美国与欧盟的谈判「毫无进展」。


据媒体报道,特朗普推迟最后期限的决定源于欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩的主动致电请求。此次会谈是特朗普就职以来两位领导人首次公开进行的通话,欧盟方面承诺「迅速果断」推进谈判。媒体分析认为,欧盟对贸易谈判的立场可能从强硬转向寻求妥协。


欧盟主席主动求和换取谈判时间


周日,特朗普在社交媒体上表示,他接到了冯德莱恩的电话请求延期,「这是我的荣幸」。这一戏剧性转折发生在特朗普周五突然将关税威胁从 20% 大幅升级至 50% 仅两天后。


特朗普周日在新泽西州莫里斯敦机场告诉记者:「我们进行了一次非常愉快的通话,我同意推迟期限。」


她说她希望进行认真谈判,「特朗普对媒体表示,」她说我们将迅速聚在一起,看看能否达成解决方案。


冯德莱恩也在 X 平台发声明称:「欧洲准备迅速果断地推进谈判。要达成一项好协议,我们需要到 7 月 9 日的时间。」分析认为,这一声明暗示欧盟委员会的立场可能转向寻求妥协。


特朗普的外部经济顾问 Stephen Moore 对媒体表示,冯德莱恩的声明是「一个有希望的信号」,表明欧盟「准备谈判」。但他也承认,「这可能不会像特朗普希望看到的那样迅速」。


僵持近两个月,双方分歧依然巨大


特朗普长期以来一直抨击欧盟,称其成立就是为了占美国便宜,并谴责美国对欧洲大陆的持续贸易逆差。


欧盟上周向美国提交了一项新的贸易提案,试图推动谈判。据报道,这个新框架涵盖了关税和非关税壁垒,以及加强经济安全、相互投资、战略采购和全球挑战合作的方式。


然而,白宫官员向你媒体表达了挫败感:「我们只是没有看到欧盟拿出任何实质性的东西。」


据报道,具体来看,美国对欧盟仅提供相互关税削减而非单方面降低关税感到不满,尤其是在其他一些贸易伙伴已向华盛顿提出类似单方面让步的背景下。更令美方不悦的是,欧盟未将其提议的数字税作为谈判要点,而这正是美国的明确要求。


美国财政部副部长 Faulkender 在媒体节目中指出,美国面临「同时挑战」——既要与欧盟作为整体就关税进行谈判,又要与各个欧洲国家就非关税壁垒进行单独谈判,这造成了「谈判问题」。


如果最终未能达成协议,欧盟已准备了价值 210 亿欧元的报复性关税清单,包括美国玉米、小麦、摩托车和服装,并正在讨论另一份价值 950 亿欧元的目标清单,包括波音飞机、汽车和波本威士忌。

Letture associate

AI is Sweeping the Globe, So Why is Crypto + AI in a Slump?

AI Booms, But Crypto + AI Remains Sluggish: A Demand-Side Analysis Despite the AI industry's explosive growth and massive investment, the convergence of blockchain and AI (Crypto + AI) has seen limited traction. The core issue is a severe supply-demand mismatch, not a flawed premise. Analyzing four key sub-sectors reveals specific gaps: 1. **Decentralized Compute/Storage:** Offer logical benefits like data sovereignty and cost savings but lack a decisive technical advantage over entrenched cloud giants (AWS, GCP). Enterprises prioritize performance and stability and are unwilling to bear the switching risk and uncertainty of decentralized networks. 2. **Model Verification/Privacy (e.g., ZKML):** Address important long-term issues like auditability and data privacy, but these are not urgent operational pain points for most businesses today. Widespread demand will likely follow regulatory mandates (like the EU AI Act), not precede them. 3. **AI Agent Infrastructure:** Projects are building infrastructure for a future of autonomous, interacting agents. However, the current market focus is on internal process automation within corporate firewalls. The technology is ahead of market readiness. 4. **AI Agent Payments:** This is the only sub-sector where blockchain is on a level playing field with traditional finance. Both are trying to solve the unsolved problem of real-time, micro-transactions for machines, making it the most immediately competitive area. The overarching problem is that the AI industry invests heavily in solutions that solve immediate bottlenecks (e.g., faster memory, more power). Most Crypto + AI solutions target secondary, longer-term concerns (decentralization, transparency) and often come with performance trade-offs. The lack of a flagship, large-scale commercial success case further hinders mainstream capital inflow. The path forward requires either aligning more closely with the current industry's performance demands or patiently building the foundational infrastructure for the next phase of AI.

Foresight News1 min fa

AI is Sweeping the Globe, So Why is Crypto + AI in a Slump?

Foresight News1 min fa

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

US spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced approximately $6 billion in net outflows over the past six weeks, marking the longest consecutive weekly withdrawal streak since their launch in 2024. The iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) from BlackRock has been particularly affected, accounting for over 70% of recent outflows. On-chain analysis indicates that long-term Bitcoin holders (holding for over 155 days), who control about 83% of the circulating supply, remain steadfast. The selling pressure is primarily coming from allocators who entered through ETF brokerage accounts. This represents the first major collective capitulation since Bitcoin gained mainstream Wall Street recognition, driven more by risk-off portfolio adjustments than a fundamental rejection of the asset. Factors such as rising inflation, a hawkish shift in Federal Reserve policy, massive capital inflows into AI infrastructure, and attractive IPO opportunities have redirected speculative funds. Bitcoin, treated as a high-beta risk asset, was among the first to be sold. While the pace of outflows has slowed significantly—from $1.72 billion in early June to $226.8 million mid-month—the structural issue remains. IBIT's large size means its outflows alone exert substantial market pressure. With spot market volume thin, new capital inflows absent, and ETF buying muted, the market lacks sufficient buying support to absorb this selling. The coming sessions are critical. If IBIT outflows decelerate and Bitcoin reclaims $60,000, this phase could be seen as a healthy reset. However, if heavy IBIT redemptions resume and the price falls below $58,000, it would signal a more sustained institutional exit, requiring non-ETF buyers to shoulder the entire selling pressure alone. The ETF, while lowering entry barriers, has not removed Bitcoin's inherent volatility.

marsbit42 min fa

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

marsbit42 min fa

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

**World Models: From Psychology to AI's Core Concept** "World model" is a trending but often confusing term in AI, describing a system that allows machines to internally simulate, predict, and rehearse potential outcomes before taking real-world action—like a mental "sandbox." While definitions vary—Yann LeCun emphasizes physical understanding, OpenAI's Sora is a video-based "world simulator," Google DeepMind's Genie 3 creates interactive 3D environments, and companies like Alibaba and Tesla focus on practical applications—the core goal is consistent: reduce reliance on vast real-world data by creating an internal, predictive model for safer and more efficient AI. The concept has deep roots, tracing back to psychologist Kenneth Craik (1943). In AI, it was revitalized by researchers like David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber (2018). Major technical approaches include: 1) generative video models (e.g., Sora) for visual realism; 2) abstract predictive models (e.g., LeCun's JEPA) for efficiency and physical reasoning; and 3) explicit 3D simulators (e.g., NVIDIA Omniverse) for precision. Fei-Fei Li proposes a classification based on the AI action loop: renderers (output observations), simulators (output world states), and planners (output actions). The emerging "World Action Model" (WAM) paradigm aims to unify future prediction and action generation. An industry framework is forming: upstream (data, compute, sensors), midstream (general and vertical platforms), and downstream applications (autonomous driving, robotics, gaming, etc.). Autonomous driving is currently the most mature use case. The current lack of a unified definition reflects the field's early, dynamic stage, similar to past tech revolutions. Different approaches—focusing on pixels, physics, or behavior—represent parallel explorations of how best to compress and understand the world. This diversity, while seemingly chaotic, signals that world models have moved from an academic idea to a critical industrial battleground, ultimately aiming to give machines the ability to understand, imagine, and reason about the world.

marsbit1 h fa

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

marsbit1 h fa

Building the Bright Path While Secretly Crossing Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September "Rate Cut"?

The title "Building the Plank Road Openly While Secretly Crossing at Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September 'Rate Cut'?" suggests Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Walsh's hawkish stance may be a deliberate smokescreen. Academy Securities analyst Peter Tchir argues in a report that markets, currently pricing a 75% chance of a September hike, are missing a potential path to a September rate cut that Walsh himself might be quietly preparing. Tchir posits that Walsh's hawkish rhetoric aims to suppress long-term yield risks (with the 10-year Treasury yield falling recently) while creating room for a narrative shift based on upcoming data. The potential political endgame, according to this view, could be rate cuts in September and October, ahead of the midterm elections. This hinges on a political logic where the Trump administration's preference for lower rates remains unchanged. A core part of Tchir's argument involves redefining inflation metrics. He contends the Fed under Walsh may deprioritize the PCE index, criticizing its lagging components like Owners' Equivalent Rent (OER). Instead, he points to alternative, more real-time indicators like the New Tenant Repeat Rent Index (NTRR) and the Truflation daily index, which shows core inflation around 1.45%. He suggests the Fed could shift its data narrative to justify policy easing. Furthermore, Tchir downplays AI-driven inflation fears. He argues that consumer price sensitivity, evidenced by negative market reactions to price hikes (e.g., Apple), contradicts persistent inflation narratives. He also separates AI/data center spending—which he sees as relatively rate-insensitive—from broader consumer affordability issues, implying rate hikes are misdirected. Based on this analysis, Tchir sees a re-pricing of rate cut expectations as likely, creating opportunities in short-duration Treasuries. He maintains a neutral-to-slightly-bullish view on the long end of the yield curve. For equities, he recommends a significant overweight in energy (especially global nuclear assets) and, within defense/security themes, an overweight in biotech/pharma versus an underweight in semiconductors, expressing caution on AI/data center valuations.

marsbit1 h fa

Building the Bright Path While Secretly Crossing Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September "Rate Cut"?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片