新Launchpad上线，auto.fun能否为ai16z续命？

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2025-04-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-04-23

Introduzione

暂未亮点功能，ai16z后续发展还需等待Eliza v2落地。

原创 | Odaily星球日报（@OdailyChina）

作者 | Asher（@Asher_ 0210 ）

新Launchpad上线，auto.fun能否为ai16z续命？

千呼万唤始出来，上周末，ELIZA 生态 Launchpad 平台 auto.fun 宣布正式上线，此外 ai16z 创始人 Shaw 也在 X 平台不停地宣传 auto.fun。那么，伴随着今晨行情的回暖，ai16z 价格能否借助 auto.fun 续命，甚至强势上涨，迎来“第二春”呢？

下面，Odaily星球日报带大家了解 Launchpad 平台 auto.fun、平台首发代币价格表现以及社区情绪。

项目简介：原生代币是 ai16z

新Launchpad上线，auto.fun能否为ai16z续命？

auto.fun 为 ai16z 生态项目，是一个社区型的开源、无代码的 Launchpad 平台，任何人都可以创建跨社交媒体平台、DeFi 应用程序和其他 Web3 服务执行任务的自主 AI 代理。

Eliza Labs 表示为了在经济层面上支持 AI Agent 发展而开发 auto.fun，而 auto.fun 将不同于普通的代币发射平台，采用了一种比以往发射平台更公平的代币模型，结合了绑定曲线和公平发行原则，其将带来的叙事层面上的变化。此外，创作者可以自主领取内容创作与代币发行所产生的费用，社区则可协作发起内容或基于其他平台创建 CTO 代币，该平台强调“反炒作”与“纯乐趣”，旨在打造一个去中心化、透明且真正属于创作者和社区的内容与代币发布空间。

值得一提的是，ai16z 创始人 Shaw 此前在 X 平台上发文表示，auto.fun 的原生代币是 ai16z。

网站多次宕机，且功能并无新意

对于各大 AI Agent 社区期待已久 ai16z 自家的 Launchpad 平台 auto.fun，自上周末上线以来，不但没有在社交媒体中看出产品体验热度、速通代币以及 ai16z 代币质押功能，反倒网站出现多次宕机情况，甚至今日上午又一次宕机。

发币功能无明显创新

auto.fun 提供的发币功能在逻辑和玩法上大致沿用了 Pump.fun 等平台的成熟模式，无论是创建流程、代币发布方式还是整体用户体验，都未展现出明显的差异化。整体来看，更像是对既有模型的“平移复刻”，而非在产品机制上进行真正的突破。

平台虽然额外推出了一个“聊天室”功能，根据用户持有的代币数量（如 1k、10k、100k、1M）划分不同的专属聊天区，试图打造某种社群归属感，但目前并未出现具备高度共识和粘性的金狗项目，导致这一“微创新”缺乏实际意义。此外，auto.fun 自带的 Swap 功能也因缺乏透明的激励机制说明（如是否有交易奖励或返佣机制），未能在社区中引发讨论或形成使用热潮，存在“工具孤岛化”的问题。

排版混乱且并未出现“金狗”

“平台发行的一堆项目中没一个能拿得出手”。由于官网对已发代币的展现形式混乱，第一次进入该平台的用户根本找不到当下哪个项目热度高，也找不到值得参与的平台龙一、龙二项目。

此外，根据社区成员对 auto.fun 数据分析（分析网站：https://autofun-iota.vercel.app/），平台共发行 576 个项目，当下市值最高的代币市值仅有 2.8 万美元，其他绝大部分项目甚至市值不足 1 万美元，可谓是冷淡。

新Launchpad上线，auto.fun能否为ai16z续命？

auto.fun 数据分析

ai16z短线上涨或仅因市场反弹，基本面未见实质利好

随着 BTC 今日强势反弹，市场情绪明显回暖，AI Agent 板块作为近期的热门题材也随之走强。其中，ai16z 表现尤为突出，今早价格一度冲高至 0.19 美元，目前暂报 0.18 美元，24 小时涨幅超过 30%。这种走势更像是市场回暖带来的强势山寨板块反弹，而非ai16z基本面出现积极变化所致。

新Launchpad上线，auto.fun能否为ai16z续命？

ai16z 日 K 线图

从目前 auto.fun 平台所发行的代币表现来看，整体市场反应平淡，未能为 ai16z 生态注入实质性的增量价值，反而因内容和玩法高度同质化，引发部分社区用户的质疑与负面反馈。因此，ai16z 代币价格是否能真正迎来“第二春”，还需取决于 auto.fun 后续是否推出具备实际效用的功能，例如 ai16z 代币的质押机制，或是由 Shaw 带来的 Eliza v2 等更具想象空间的生态升级。

Letture associate

Predicting World Cup Knockout Matches: Why Are Different AI Models So Far Apart?

AI performance in predicting the 2026 FIFA World Cup knockout matches varied significantly, according to an analysis of models including ChatGPT, Grok, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Claude. The standout predictions came from DeepSeek and Gemini for the Netherlands vs. Morocco match. Gemini precisely forecasted a 1-1 draw and a penalty shootout win for Morocco, while DeepSeek correctly identified the high probability of a draw and Morocco's potential to advance via a defensive and counter-attacking strategy. Grok and Tongyi Qianwen (千问) demonstrated strength in predicting accurate scores for matches with clearer favorites. They correctly called the narrow 1-0 win for Canada over South Africa and Brazil's 2-1 victory over Japan, as well as Norway's 2-1 win over Ivory Coast. ChatGPT and Claude excelled more in match process analysis than in predicting exact scores or upsets. They frequently identified potential challenges for favorites, such as Japan's pressing against Brazil or DR Congo's defensive tactics against England, even when predicting the favorite's ultimate victory. A notable failure was the unanimous misjudgment of Germany vs. Paraguay. All models incorrectly favored Germany, underestimating Paraguay's ability to force a penalty shootout and cause an upset. In summary, Gemini and DeepSeek showed the most insight for high-stakes, unpredictable matches. Grok and Qianwen were reliable "score predictors" for less volatile games. ChatGPT and Claude were strong "analytical models," adept at outlining match dynamics but often hesitant to predict upsets.

Odaily星球日报7 min fa

Predicting World Cup Knockout Matches: Why Are Different AI Models So Far Apart?

Odaily星球日报7 min fa

VELVET stalls at $2—How deep could the current pullback go?

Velvet (VELVET) experienced a bullish push above the key $2.00 resistance on June 29, reaching a high of $2.17, fueled by partnership news with Aerodrome Finance. However, momentum has since slowed, with an 11.5% price correction in 24 hours and a 27.1% drop in trading volume. Technical analysis shows mixed signals. While the On-Balance Volume (OBV) indicates sustained buying pressure, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) has turned negative, signaling significant capital outflows and short-term distribution. The overall structure remains bearish on the 1-day chart, though the recent correction found support at the 20-day moving average. Market data suggests the current pullback represents controlled selling pressure rather than a full trend reversal. Key supports to watch are the $2.00 level and the 20-day moving average near $0.75. The risk-to-reward ratio for new long positions is currently unfavorable, but the steady spot Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) and funding rate indicate underlying bullish strength. Traders may consider using a deeper pullback as a potential buying opportunity.

ambcrypto19 min fa

VELVET stalls at $2—How deep could the current pullback go?

ambcrypto19 min fa

Will There Be a Next Wave of Web3 Games? Veteran Player's Review: At the Peak of Hype, You Should at Least Sell Half

**Title: Is There Another Wave for Web3 Gaming? A Veteran Player's Review: When Hype Peaks, You Must Exit at Least Half** **Summary:** In an interview, veteran player "Earn Money Chicken" shares his journey and reflections on Web3 gaming. He transitioned from being a traditional in-game trader to a Web3 gamer, having profited from games like Mobox, StepN, and Seraph, but also experiencing significant losses. He defines himself primarily as a player, not an investor, attracted to Web3 games for the blend of earning potential, engaging gameplay, and the satisfaction of researching game mechanics. While he enjoys strategic "gambling" within games, he emphasizes it's not about zero-sum competition with other players. The interview explores the complex, often adversarial relationship between players, projects, and major investors (whales). The player's experience as a traditional game merchant helped develop his analytical mindset for spotting opportunities, but wasn't directly transferable. He identifies the core sources of profit in early Web3 gaming as **"era红利" (era-specific红利)** and strategic foresight, not just simple calculations. He warns that the biggest mistake ordinary players make is calculating their return-on-investment (ROI) period at peak hype, as asset and yield depreciation can trap them. Reflecting on his wins and losses, he now advocates for managing expectations. His most successful exit was from Seraph, where he sold at a relatively good time. The key problem with current Web3 games, he argues, is that most are not mature games first. A successful Web3 game must primarily be a **good, fun game** with a genuine player base willing to spend money for enjoyment, not just participants seeking profit. The blockchain element should solve problems within that context, not be the primary driver. While he believes the sector might see another speculative boom (possibly another strong "Ponzi" model attracting hype), a truly mature and sustainable Web3 game likely needs to come from a traditional major game studio. It would leverage a proven IP, mature content, a functional NFT trading system, and attract both traditional and crypto-native players, offering more normalized returns rather than extreme暴利. His final advice: Newcomers without prior experience should avoid the space now, as it's like searching for a diamond in the rough. For those remaining, the rule is: be brave when assets are low and overlooked, but **when everyone is talking about it (at peak hype), you must sell at least half your holdings.**

marsbit52 min fa

Will There Be a Next Wave of Web3 Games? Veteran Player's Review: At the Peak of Hype, You Should at Least Sell Half

marsbit52 min fa

Solana dApps Generated $257 Million In Q2 Revenue, Data Shows

Solana's decentralized applications (dApps) generated $257 million in revenue during the second quarter of 2026, marking the ninth consecutive quarter the network has led major Layer 1 and Layer 2 blockchains in fee-generating activity. This revenue metric, considered harder than hype, indicates real on-chain economic activity like decentralized exchange trading and token launches. While the figure underscores Solana's position as one of crypto's most active ecosystems and provides a narrative edge over Ethereum rivals, it is heavily tied to high-velocity, speculative trading such as meme coin activity. This dependency means revenue could decline if market sentiment shifts. The key test for Solana's dApp economy will be sustaining this revenue base during quieter market conditions.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Solana dApps Generated $257 Million In Q2 Revenue, Data Shows

bitcoinist1 h fa

The Most Hidden AI Winners

"The Most Under-the-Radar AI Winners" While core AI giants and their direct suppliers have dominated headlines, a group of seemingly unrelated, decades-old manufacturing companies have emerged as major beneficiaries. A key example is Japan's TOTO, famous for bathroom fixtures. Its stock soared 145% in a year, driven not by its mainstay toilet business but by its nearly 40-year-old semiconductor ceramic component unit. Specifically, TOTO manufactures electrostatic chucks—critical, hard-to-replace parts for advanced chip manufacturing processes like etching and EUV lithography. This segment, though only 9% of revenue, contributed over 54% of operating profit in FY2025 with a 43% margin. High barriers to entry, including deep know-how in high-purity ceramic sintering and long supplier certification cycles (5+ years), secure its position. This pattern repeats across industries. Nitto Boseki, a 128-year-old glass fiber maker, saw its stock rise 325% due to near-monopoly supply of T-glass, an essential low-expansion material for AI chip substrates. Similarly, Ajinomoto, the global MSG leader, commands 80-95% of the market for ABF film, a vital insulating layer in chip packaging. These "hidden" segments, often born from deep materials science expertise, are now bottleneck supplies in the AI hardware chain, enjoying pricing power and high margins. In China's A-share market, the theme combines this AI-driven demand with domestic substitution. Companies like Zhongci Electronic (advancing in electrostatic chucks) and Honghe Technology & Feilihua (in high-end electronic glass fabrics) are gaining traction. The investment thesis hinges on whether these domestic players can rapidly scale qualified capacity to capture the supply gap within the critical time window. Ultimately, these cases show that in the AI supply chain, high-profit concentrations exist not only at the cutting-edge tech frontier but also in indispensable, difficult-to-replicate materials and components. Market recognition often lags behind fundamental profit shifts, creating potential for significant re-ratings as traditional industrial firms are re-evaluated as key enablers of advanced semiconductor manufacturing.

marsbit1 h fa

The Most Hidden AI Winners

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片