稳定币供应创历史新高,哪些投资策略将从中获利?

链捕手Pubblicato 2025-03-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-03-11

原文作者:Ignas

原文编译:Tim,PANews

 

稳定币总供应量创历史新高,过去两年增长44%。

哪些投资策略将从稳定币的大规模采用中获利呢?

稳定币供应创历史新高,哪些投资策略将从中获利?

作为背景补充,特朗普政府将8月设定为通过稳定币法案的最后期限。

在此趋势下,主流传统金融机构正积极布局稳定币市场。仅举几例:

  • 美国银行:若监管允许,对推出自有稳定币持开放态度
  • 渣打银行:计划推出与港元挂钩的稳定币
  • PayPal:2025年对其稳定币PYUSD进行市场拓展
  • Stripe:以11亿美元收购稳定币基础设施平台Bridge
  • Revolut:探索发行稳定币的可能性
  • Visa:将稳定币整合至支付系统及全球业务网络

此前,稳定币供应量的增加往往会推高加密货币价格,因为人们会短期持有这些稳定币主要用于投机交易。

如今,稳定币的应用已超越投机范畴。例如,SpaceX通过稳定币回笼其在阿根廷和尼日利亚的星链销售资金,人工智能公司ScaleAI也使用稳定币支付给海外承包商。

最简单的投资策略是押注于主流机构可能发行新稳定币的赛道。

以太坊、Base、波场和Solana是当前稳定币发行的主要公链。

稳定币供应创历史新高,哪些投资策略将从中获利?

值得注意的是,尽管SOL是主宰了本轮牛市,但Solana链上的稳定币增长却比较缓慢。目前仅有Base链凭借USDC成功坐上稳定币竞争的牌桌。

由于Base链本身未发行代币,Coinbase的股票(纳斯达克代码:COIN)或成为的潜在标的。

另一种策略是等待USDC发行方Circle的IPO,或选择投资Visa、PayPal的股票。

除了交易和支付,稳定币还被用于DeFi中赚取收益:

因此,若稳定币供应量持续扩大,成熟的DeFi协议可能成为主要受益者:

- Aave/Morpho/Euler/Fluid

- Uniswap/Curve

- Maker

- Ethena

稳定币供应量增加 → 推高链上总锁仓量(TVL) → 协议手续费收入增长 → 代币估值提升(尤其具备收入分成机制的代币)

收益是影响稳定币市场动态的关键因素:

例如:PayPal的稳定币PYUSD现已上线Solana和以太坊,但其增长较为缓慢。

Solana曾凭借Kamino协议的高年化收益激励稳定币供应量增加,以挑战以太坊的地位,但其链上稳定币供应量随后陷入停滞,而以太坊的供应量仍在持续增长。

稳定币供应创历史新高,哪些投资策略将从中获利?

跨链平台与预言机将受益于多链稳定币的增长,因其带来交易量提升及手续费收入增加:

- Chainlink

- LayerZero/Socket

- Debridge/Across等

然而,最诱人的投资机会或将来自尚未问世的新型基础设施、消费级应用及收益型产品,新锐代币往往能引发更高的市场关注度。

待加密货币价格回暖,稳定币的超级叙事将全面爆发,这也将是我(作为狂热研究者)投入更多时间深耕的领域。

无论如何,稳定币的大规模采用对加密货币市场是超级利好:

以太坊、Solana、Base等公链的区块空间需求将激增,因此押注智能合约公链是最基础的投资策略。

你心中的投资策略是什么呢?

Letture associate

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbit4 h fa

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbit4 h fa

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbit4 h fa

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片