Orbs Perpetual Hub Enhances Mode Network Perps Markets via Xpanse Integration

bitcoinistPubblicato 2025-02-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-02-25

Introduzione

Blockchain infra provider Orbs has integrated its Perpetual Hub with Xpanse, the leading perps trading protocol on Mode network. The...

Blockchain infra provider Orbs has integrated its Perpetual Hub with Xpanse, the leading perps trading protocol on Mode network. The move will deliver improved liquidity and advanced trading features to Mode users, providing a better experience for traders on Xpanse’s onchain perpetual markets.

Operating as an EVM Layer 2, Mode is intent on scaling DeFi applications with lower costs and faster transactions. Xpanse, whose futures exchange offers over 340 markets with up to 60x leverage, embodies this objective, fully showing off Mode’s capabilities which have been further burnished thanks to Orbs’ arrival.

Perps for the People

Orbs Perpetual Hub acts as a decentralized abstraction layer, enhancing Xpanse’s operations with optimized order execution and liquidity management. This setup reduces spreads and slippage, common pain points in DeFi trading, while maintaining the security of onchain settlement. It’s a service that Orbs has been bringing to bear across the multichain landscape in recent months, rolling out integrations galore and making its name synonymous with onchain liquidity.

Orbs’ Proof-of-Stake L3 blockchain specializes in augmenting base-layer networks like Ethereum or Mode with advanced execution capabilities. Its Perpetual Hub joins tools like dLIMIT and dTWAP, which mimic centralized finance functionalities such as limit orders and time-weighted average pricing, within a decentralized framework. In aggregating liquidity pools and streamlining order matching, Perpetual Hub ensures Mode traders experience tighter bid-ask spreads and more efficient capital use, critical for high-leverage perpetual contracts.

Xpanse, meanwhile, has been earning plaudits for its multi-layered liquidity model, blending intent-based, oracle-based, and order book systems. Beyond liquidity, Xpanse offers AI-driven tools: Viper AI for momentum prediction, Minima/Maxima for real-time peak detection, WaveML for trend analysis, and a Fear & Greed Index for sentiment tracking. Combined, these give traders powerful data-driven insights. 

The addition of Orbs’ infrastructure enhances these features, enabling smoother execution and potentially lowering the cost of leveraged positions, which typically incur fees of 0.02% to 0.07% per trade on similar platforms.

Making L2 Liquidity Great

Mode network, launched to optimize DeFi scalability, has gained traction for its low-latency transactions and compatibility with Ethereum’s tooling. Its use cases extend beyond trading to include tokenized real-world assets, a growing sector projected to reach $16 trillion by 2030. Xpanse’s presence on Mode already supports such innovation, and Orbs’ integration could amplify this by enabling cross-chain liquidity aggregation, connecting Mode to broader DeFi pools, and supporting automated trading strategies.

For traders, the integration offers practical benefits: reduced transaction costs via smart liquidity routing and the potential to explore Mode’s ecosystem, which may include future incentive programs akin to those seen on other L2s. As the EVM Layer 2 ecosystem ossifies, distinct chains are emerging with a reputation for specializing in specific onchain crafts. For Mode, thanks to the popularity of platforms such as Xpanse, that use case appears to be perps, a narrative that has further strengthened thanks to Orbs’ entry, bringing its trust liquidity layer in tow.

Bitcoinist

Bitcoinist

Bitcoinist is the ultimate news and review site for the crypto currency community!

Letture associate

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手3 h fa

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手3 h fa

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手3 h fa

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手3 h fa

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit3 h fa

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片