行情遇冷,如何通过Hyperliquid HLP金库赚取稳定收益?

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2025-02-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-02-24

Introduzione

本文分析了Hyperliquid HLP金库的风险与回报。

原文作者:@RyskyGeronimo

原文编译:Ashley

编者按:本文介绍了 Hyperliquid HLP 金库,其显示其低波动、高 Sharpe 比率及与比特币的负相关性,组合策略可显著提升回报。HLP 随 TVL 增长波动收敛,Sharpe 比率提升,未来或成为 HyperEVM 优质用例。

以下为原文内容(为便于阅读理解,原内容有所整编):

我很高兴分享对 Hyperliquid HLP 金库进行的风险与回报分析。

结论:

  • 累计回报: 143% (HLP)vs 264% (BTC)

  • 年度波动率: 17.89% (HLP)vs 45.67% (BTC)

  • Sharpe 比率: 2.89 (HLP)vs 1.80 (BTC)

  • 最大回撤:-6.6% (HLP)vs -23% (BTC)

行情遇冷,如何通过Hyperliquid HLP金库赚取稳定收益?

杠杆会同时放大收益和损失。由于 HLP 波动性更低,在达到与比特币同等风险水平前可承受更高杠杆(2.5 倍)。通过将 HLP 风险调整至与比特币波动率匹配,整体回报显著提升。

行情遇冷,如何通过Hyperliquid HLP金库赚取稳定收益?

HLP 与比特币呈现-9.6% 的负相关性。换言之,当比特币(及加密市场整体)下跌时,HLP 往往呈现反向走势。这种负相关性创造了增强收益的机会。

80% HLP + 20% BTC 组合将累计回报提升至 175% ,同时波动率降至 16% ,Sharpe 比率达 3.6 。若对该组合加杠杆至匹配比特币波动率,累计回报可超 1000% 。

行情遇冷,如何通过Hyperliquid HLP金库赚取稳定收益?

HLP 早期波动较高,随着 TVL 增长(目前已突破 5 亿美元),波动率持续收敛。

行情遇冷,如何通过Hyperliquid HLP金库赚取稳定收益?

过去 52 周数据显示:虽然 HLP 全周期复合年化增长率(CAGR)为 42%,但最近 12 个月 CAGR 已降至 22%。与之对应的是年化波动率同步降至 4.5%,推动 Sharpe 比率跃升至 5.2!

行情遇冷,如何通过Hyperliquid HLP金库赚取稳定收益?

Hyperliquid 团队对此早有预判:"更多做市商加入将对 HLP 产生正向影响。随着 HLP 不再需要承担全部风险,策略 Sharpe 比率将进一步提升。"

通过双位数回报和低波动性的循环,HLP 可能会成为 HyperEVM 上的一个有趣应用案例。

行情遇冷,如何通过Hyperliquid HLP金库赚取稳定收益?

随着金库资本基数的扩展,我们可以预期增长率将放缓。由于规模的增加,月度回报变得更加稳定。最近每月约 1.75% 的平均回报仍然具有吸引力,特别是与代币的波动性相比。

需要注意的是:由于金库的终身数据是以 4 天为单位提供的,而非每日数据,因此需要将数据重新采样为每周间隔,这几乎肯定会引入一些跟踪误差。

自 2023 年中以来,HLP 金库已经取得了长足的进展,从一个利基市场做市金库发展为一个 TVL 超过 5 亿美元的策略。

展望未来,进一步的透明度——特别是每日回报数据——将有助于用户更精确地追踪 HLP 的表现。HLP 是去中心化市场做市如何实现稳定的风险调整回报,并提供链上回报的差异化来源的典型例子。

行情遇冷,如何通过Hyperliquid HLP金库赚取稳定收益?

原文链接

Letture associate

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

MicroStrategy, the world's largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, has significantly shifted its business model. Between June 29 and July 5, the company sold 3,588 bitcoins for approximately $216 million to fund quarterly dividends for its preferred stock. This marks its largest-ever Bitcoin sale and signals a strategic pivot: Bitcoin is transitioning from a "buy-and-hold" reserve asset to a liquidity management tool for the company. This move follows a recent authorization allowing Bitcoin sales when equity fundraising is less attractive. The announcement contributed to a more than 5% intraday drop in MicroStrategy's stock price, while Bitcoin fell to around $61,800—below the company's average holding cost of roughly $75,700. The sale represents a major departure from MicroStrategy's long-standing "never sell" commitment, which saw its first minor breach in May with a $2.5 million sale. The latest, hundred-times-larger transaction underscores growing financial pressures. Analysts note the company faces about $1.5 billion in annual preferred dividend obligations, far exceeding cash flow from its software business. As of July 5, MicroStrategy holds 843,775 bitcoins. Its current operational logic involves buying Bitcoin during favorable financing conditions and selling portions to cover dividends when needed, creating a flexible capital management cycle amidst a challenging market environment.

华尔街日报1 h fa

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

华尔街日报1 h fa

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

Quantum Computing's Threat to Cryptocurrency: A Countdown to Q-Day Quantum computing, specifically Shor's algorithm, poses a fundamental threat to the public-key cryptography (e.g., ECDSA, RSA) that secures blockchain networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This critical juncture, known as Q-Day, is estimated to occur potentially within the next 5-15 years. The core vulnerability stems from the public and immutable nature of blockchains. Assets in addresses where the public key is already exposed on-chain (e.g., spent outputs) are at direct risk, as a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive the private key. This threatens the very trust model of cryptocurrencies. The response lies in Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)—algorithms like lattice-based ML-DSA and hash-based SLH-DSA, which are resistant to quantum attacks. NIST has standardized key PQC algorithms (FIPS 203, 204, 205), providing a migration path. However, the primary challenge is not technical but socio-economic and involves complex governance: * **Bitcoin's** path is constrained by its conservative ethos. Migrating requires a soft-fork to new address types, facing hurdles like significantly larger signature sizes and, most critically, the divisive governance question of how to handle at-risk legacy UTXOs without violating core principles. * **Ethereum** is pursuing a "cryptographic agility" strategy, with a multi-layered roadmap. It leverages account abstraction for user accounts and is developing compressed hash-based signatures (e.g., leanXMSS) for its consensus layer, aiming for a full-stack upgrade over time. In conclusion, quantum computing does not spell an instant end for cryptocurrency but initiates a critical countdown. The industry has a limited "engineering comfort window" to orchestrate a coordinated, ecosystem-wide migration to PQC. The ultimate bottlenecks are the immense coordination efforts and governance decisions required for this foundational transition.

marsbit2 h fa

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

marsbit2 h fa

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

Former US President Donald Trump reported a record-breaking $2.2 billion in personal income for 2025, the highest annual income ever disclosed by a sitting president. This figure, from a 927-page government ethics filing, represented a 3.5-fold increase from his $600 million income in 2024 and boosted his net worth to $6.5 billion. The primary drivers were cryptocurrency (64% of income, approximately $1.4 billion) and real estate (26%, approximately $575 million). His crypto earnings stemmed largely from the launch of his personal meme coin, $TRUMP, generating over $600 million in licensing fees, and substantial profits from the WLFI token and its parent company. Despite a sluggish property market, his Mar-a-Lago resort and associated golf clubs saw revenue surges of 50% and 27%, respectively, attributed to their use as venues for presidential events. Trump's financial disclosure also revealed an unprecedented level of stock market activity, with over 22,000 trades executed in 2025, averaging 87 trades per market day. Media analyses noted several instances where significant trading coincided with major policy announcements, such as proposed tariffs, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. While the White House stated these trades were handled by a family-managed trust fund and not Trump directly, critics highlighted this as a departure from the blind trusts traditionally used by presidents post-Watergate. The report has intensified debate over the commercialization of the presidency. Supporters view it as a success story of a businessman-president, while critics argue it demonstrates an unprecedented conversion of public influence into private wealth, with policy decisions potentially linked to personal financial gains. The controversy centers on whether Trump's earnings represent innovative entrepreneurship or a fundamental conflict of interest, sparking renewed calls for stricter ethics reforms in US governance.

marsbit3 h fa

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

marsbit3 h fa

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手3 h fa

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手3 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片