EDU Chain首届全球线上黑客松 “Semester 1”回顾

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2025-01-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-01-25

Introduzione

由Open Campus主办，吸引了大量开发者参与，重点支持去中心化教育解决方案，评选出多个获奖项目，并为开发者提供加速器支持和资金机会。

Hackathon 总结

EDU Chain Hackathon: Semester 1  在 2024 年圆满结束，活动参与人数众多，成果显著。该活动由 Open Campus 主办，共有 725 个项目参赛，吸引了 4, 672 名开发者，奖池达 $ 200, 000 。经过评选，共有 20 位获奖者分别来自两个主要类别——DeFi 和基础设施，还有 12 位获奖者来自其他四个类别。

评审标准重点关注生态系统影响、创新性和可扩展性，由 Animoca Brands 和 Open Campus 等组织的代表进行评估。获奖者可加入 Open Campus 加速器计划中的 EDU Chain 开发者群，获得 DAO 提案支持，并通过 Forbes 等平台获得媒体曝光。他们还可以加入一个专门的 Discord 频道与评委交流，每个项目有高达 $ 100, 000 的潜在资金支持机会。

此次 hackathon 是 EDU Chain 上去中心化应用程序开发的关键事件。EDU Chain 是 Arbitrum Orbit Stack 内的一个 L3 Rollup，旨在加强基于区块链的教育解决方案。来自 Forbes Web3 和 ApeCoin 等公司的赞助突显出区块链在教育行业中的日益融合，加强了民主化教育的更广泛使命。

Hackathon 获奖者

DeFi 奖项获奖者

  • SailFish veDEX：这个去中心化交易所建立在 Open Campus 上，利用 Vote-Escrow 和 ( 3, 3) 博弈论与用户分享交易费用。它提高了收益机会，运行在 Sepolia 网络上。

  • Blend-lending protocol for educhain：提供以 $EDU 代币为抵押的教育贷款，提供诸如 USDT 的稳定资产。该协议采用由 $EDU 代币持有者治理的安全透明智能合约。

  • Streambill：利用 Sablier 协议和 Request Network 为自由职业者提供实时支付，增强发票和支付清晰度。

  • stakedu：一个 $EDU 代币的抵押平台，提供奖励和动态分配管理，增加 EDUchain 生态系统的参与度。

  • P2P Lending and Borrowing Protocol for Ordinals Powered by EduChain：提供以 NFT 为抵押的贷款，利息最高达 350% ，其智能合约可跨网络结合 Ordinals。

基础设施 dApps 奖项获奖者

  • create-edu-dapp：为 EduChain 上的 dApp 开发提供 CLI 工具，支持 Next.js、Hardhat 和 Foundry，以便进行无缝测试和部署。

  • poapedu：将学习认证集中化为链上 NFT，借助全面的技能映射帮助职业规划。

  • Grasp Academy：此基于区块链的 LMS 通过 NFT 奖励用户参与，整合教育融资和个性化 AI 工具。

  • Blitz Protocol：提供实时区块链数据访问、可扩展后端的数据信息解决方案，专为 Open Campus 网络优化。

  • ThrustPad ILO ：一个去中心化的筹资平台，利用代币锁定和抵押机制支持教育技术计划。

EduFi 奖项获奖者

  • Campus Arc BETA：为全球学生连接的协作在线学习，专注于基于项目的体验，结合 Web2 和 Web3 框架。

  • DcodeBlock：一个游戏化平台，帮助开发者通过任务和 AI 增强学习从 Web2 过渡到 Web3。

  • Course 3 ：一个去中心化的课程市场平台，采用 Web3 技术在课程之间实现安全验证。

  • CourseCast：管理教育广告活动，提供访问者分析工具，利用 Edu 代币和零知识证明进行验证。

  • Vault：提供小额费用和跨链兼容的教育金融平台，通过区块链促进学费和薪资支付。

Earn 奖项获奖者

  • OpenTaskAI：通过区块链支持的市场将 AI 自由职业者与全球机会连接，使用智能合约保障安全。

  • [Ludium] Edu Bounty Management System：通过透明的链上合约简化教育悬赏管理的任务验证和支付。

  • PRISM: Decentralised Content Ecosystem：将数字内容标记化为 NFT，从而增强创作者和读者的变现和来源可靠性。

  • According.Work：自动化开源贡献的奖励分配，通过 GitHub 集成和区块链保障透明度。

  • edBank：建立以 EDU 资产支持的稳定币系统，提供灵活的铸币和借款服务。

Learn 奖项获奖者

  • Proof of Learn：一个互动的 Web3 学习平台，提供基于区块链的任务及 POAP 奖励，重视实践概念的部署。

  • Sorted Wallet：为功能手机用户提供加密超级应用，提供资产存储和转换功能，以增加金融访问。

  • DAO UNI 3.0 ：一个由 DAO 治理的去中心化大学，提供基于代币的课程和互动虚拟环境。

  • AI Tutor：通过个性化 AI 导师和 NFT 证书提高教育体验，实现可验证的成就。

其他奖项获奖者

  • EDUCHAIN Community Faucet：通过在 Open Campus 上统一 token faucet 简化多平台的代币测试。

  • Lore Network：通过基于区块链的凭证和 AI 学习工具将在线内容转化为全球教育中心。

  • DDream：设计用于模块化开发的开源 AI 集成游戏引擎，着重于社区所有权。

  • LPU Name Service：为管理基于 NFT 的学术凭证提供安全的 Web3 域名服务。

  • MusiCoinCity：将区块链与主题音景结合，以促进对环境活动的捐款，确保通过智能合约实现透明。

有关这些项目的更多详细信息，请访问 Dorahacks Hackathon 页面。

关于主办方

Open Campus

Open Campus 是一个由社区驱动的协议，旨在通过去中心化教育决策来赋能教育者、内容创作者、家长和学生。该计划鼓励教育工作者根据学生需求定制教材，创造一个协作的环境。Open Campus 还通过其“Bringing Education On-Chain”计划为全球有影响力的教育者开辟新的金融渠道，将教育与区块链技术相结合，强调学习方法的创新。作为教育技术领域的积极参与者，Open Campus 一直致力于提高全球教育的可及性和有效性。

Letture associate

CASHCAT Market Cap Surpasses $100 Million! Robinhood Chain Goes Viral

The meme coin CASHCAT has skyrocketed over 1300% in 24 hours, surpassing a $130 million market cap and bringing significant attention to the Robinhood Chain and its meme launch platform, Noxa.fi. Noxa.fi is a multi-chain meme launchpad that recently added support for Robinhood Chain. It enforces key rules for launches on this network: a low base fee of 0.0005 ETH, instant listing on Uniswap V3, a 1% standard trading fee (no additional token tax), and anti-sniping measures for the first hour to prevent bot manipulation. Currently, 9 of the top 10 tokens by market cap on Robinhood Chain were launched via Noxa.fi. The leader is CASHCAT ($130M), which carries a narrative tied to Robinhood's original considered name, "Cash Cat." Other notable tokens include GME ($4M) and DIH ($4.1M). The article cautions that meme coins are driven purely by hype and community sentiment, with volatile and often short lifecycles. To participate, users need to configure the Robinhood Chain network, bridge assets using supported bridges, and can track tokens on platforms like GMGN and DEX Screener.

Foresight News15 min fa

CASHCAT Market Cap Surpasses $100 Million! Robinhood Chain Goes Viral

Foresight News15 min fa

Collateral Dollars: How Does a 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Form?

Collateral Dollars: How Does a "Second Layer of Dollars" Form on Top of Stablecoins? Most assume stablecoins replicate Eurodollar functions, expanding the offshore dollar system. However, stablecoins primarily replace specific functions like operational dollar balances for settlement. They do not inherently create new dollar credit; they substitute existing claims. The key question is: what happens when financial intermediaries use stablecoins as collateral to create a new layer of dollar-denominated claims? This "collateral dollar" channel operates through secured lending, not direct money creation. A money-like event only occurs when a liability issued against the controlled stablecoin is funded, rolled over, or accepted at near-par value by another balance sheet. The discount (haircut) prices the gap between "effective control over the token" and "reliable convertibility to bank dollars." Elasticity stems not from the stablecoin itself but from the liability issued against it and the willingness of third-party balance sheets to treat that liability as a near-par asset. Compared to the traditional Eurodollar system—where elasticity originates from bank deposit creation—the stablecoin collateral chain is structurally different. Eurodollar deposits are credit-expansive from inception. Stablecoins are initially substitutive; elasticity emerges later if an intermediary's liability against them gains monetary acceptance. Stablecoins disrupt specific tiers of the offshore dollar system, mainly replacing operational settlement balances. They do not replace the need for full dollar balance-sheet capacity (credit lines, hedging, maturity transformation). For systemic impact, the second-layer liability must pass three tests: transferability, funding capacity, and monetary acceptance (being fundable or held at par by others). Pressure transmission also differs. In the Eurodollar system, stress moves up a hierarchy of claims. In a stablecoin collateral chain, the second-layer liability can lose its money-like status well before the underlying stablecoin faces a run, often triggered by haircut increases and margin calls that create a dynamic spiral of falling token prices and rising discounts. In conclusion, the "collateral dollar" is not the stablecoin itself. It is the second-layer liability issued against a controlled token balance that is willing to be funded and maintained at near-par value. Its existence depends on that liability surviving the leap from "token liquidity" to "bank dollar liquidity."

marsbit35 min fa

Collateral Dollars: How Does a 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Form?

marsbit35 min fa

Collateral Dollars: How the 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Takes Shape?

"Collateralized Dollars: How a 'Second Layer of Dollars' Forms on Top of Stablecoins" Most assume stablecoins replicate Eurodollars and expand the offshore dollar system, but this is not accurate. Stablecoins primarily replace certain functions within the existing system, especially operational dollar balances for daily settlement. The critical question is what happens when financial intermediaries create a new layer of dollar claims *on top of* stablecoins. This article explains how this new collateralized funding channel works. Stablecoins introduce tokenized private dollar claims. Even if issuers and reserves are within the US legal perimeter, their circulation and use as collateral can become economically "offshore." Enforceable control over collateral opens a secured credit channel but does not itself create a monetary claim. A true monetary event occurs only when another balance sheet funds, rolls over, or accepts a liability issued against the controlled token at near-par value. The discount prices the gap between "effective control over the token" and "reliable convertibility into bank dollars." Elasticity comes from the balance sheet issuing the liability against the token and from third-party willingness to treat that liability as a near-par asset. Collateralized Dollars are not the stablecoins themselves; they are the second-layer liability that another balance sheet is willing to issue, fund, and maintain at near-par against a controlled token balance. The Eurodollar system is a hierarchy of claims, with elasticity originating in expandable bank liabilities. In contrast, the stablecoin collateral chain starts with a tokenized asset. It gains systemic significance only when an intermediary's liability against that token is treated as money-like by other balance sheets. Key determining factors include: who has effective control, the legal/operational path to bank dollars, and whether the resulting claim can still be financed near-par under stress. Pressure in this new channel manifests differently. The upper-layer (intermediary) claim fails first, losing its money-like status, potentially while the underlying stablecoin remains solvent. Increased haircuts and forced sales can create a destructive feedback loop, widening the very gap the discount measures. In conclusion, the Eurodollar analogy has limits. Reserve quality supports the underlying token's solvency, but the leverage, credit, and liabilities built atop it face a separate test. Collateral eligibility is not monetary acceptance. Only when a claim built on stablecoins survives the leap from "token liquidity" to "bank dollar liquidity" do Collateralized Dollars truly exist.

链捕手42 min fa

Collateral Dollars: How the 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Takes Shape?

链捕手42 min fa

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25 Billion Cap: MicroStrategy's Three-Pronged Bitcoin Sale Pools Hide Massive Selling Pressure

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25B Cap: Strategy's Three-Tier Bitcoin Sales Plan Hides Massive Potential Selling Pressure Strategy recently sold 3,588 BTC (~$216M) to fund a dividend and replenish its dollar reserve, while claiming its $1.25B "reserve build" capacity remains fully available. This highlights a key nuance: the widely cited $1.25B limit applies only to sales for "Building" the reserve. Strategy's broader capital framework, however, allows Bitcoin sales for three primary purposes, each with different scales: 1. **Building the Reserve:** Selling BTC to raise up to $1.25B for the reserve. 2. **Covering Priority Share Expenses:** Selling BTC to pay dividends/interest or to replenish the reserve after such payments are made from it (no specified limit). 3. **Share Repurchase Funding:** Selling BTC to fund up to $1B each in convertible note and common stock repurchases (totaling $2B potential). Combined, just the capped "Build" and "Repurchase" channels could facilitate over $3B in Bitcoin sales, excluding the uncapped "Cover Expenses" channel. The accounting distinction between "Building" (adding cash before a payout) and "Replenishing" (adding cash after a payout) is operationally blurry but allows sales like the recent $216M transaction without touching the $1.25B "Build" quota. This gives Strategy significant flexibility. The move signifies a strategic shift: Strategy is transforming from a simple Bitcoin accumulator into an active capital manager, akin to a hedge fund. Bitcoin is now a financial lever to balance pressures between common stock, convertible notes, dollar reserves, and Bitcoin holdings. This creates inherent tensions—actions benefiting one part of the capital structure may harm another. Investors must understand that the potential Bitcoin sales are far greater than the surface-level $1.25B figure. Strategy has become a complex financial entity where every term in its disclosures matters. Betting on it now is a wager on its active capital management skill to navigate these internal contradictions without a systemic failure.

Foresight News48 min fa

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25 Billion Cap: MicroStrategy's Three-Pronged Bitcoin Sale Pools Hide Massive Selling Pressure

Foresight News48 min fa

When the Largest BTC Buyer Becomes a Seller, Who's Buying After MicroStrategy Sells 3,588 Bitcoin?

MicroStrategy, once the largest corporate buyer of Bitcoin, sold 3,588 BTC for approximately $216 million to fund its preferred stock dividends, marking a significant shift from buyer to seller. This move occurred after its market-to-NAV premium vanished, breaking its "print stock to buy Bitcoin" financial model. A roundtable discussion featuring Austin Campbell, Ram Ahluwalia, and Chris Perkins analyzed the implications. They noted that MicroStrategy's dominance has become a narrative bottleneck for the broader crypto market, with some speculating that Bitcoin's price might only surge significantly after the company's influence wanes. The conversation expanded to examine the capital structure conflict between traditional equity and crypto tokens, arguing that most current tokens will fail as they don't fit neatly into existing debt/equity frameworks. A "stablecoin war" was identified as a major trend, with entities like Tether, Robinhood, and the OUSD alliance competing. Tether's decision to abandon the European MiCA market highlights strategic divergences. The panelists argued that bank-issued stablecoins could revolutionize global finance by allowing US banks to capture net interest margins from international transactions, potentially making JPMorgan the first trillion-dollar bank. They concluded that while capital is currently being siphoned by AI/semiconductors, markets will eventually refocus on fundamentals and cash flow, which could benefit cryptocurrencies with real utility.

marsbit55 min fa

When the Largest BTC Buyer Becomes a Seller, Who's Buying After MicroStrategy Sells 3,588 Bitcoin?

marsbit55 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片