stETH/ETH De-peg and Its Effect on Celsius

ALTCOINBUZZPubblicato 2022-06-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-06-15

Introduzione

Today, we look at the stETH/ETH de-peg, what caused it, and what adverse effects it could potentially have on the crypto market.

Turmoil doesn’t seem to slow down when there’s a bear market ongoing. Even before the recent UST de-peg debacle settles, another asset – stETH – risks de-pegging against its intended peg, ETH. Today, we run through the cause of this de-peg and what it means for Celsius and the market.

Background

To understand stETH, you must firstly know what liquid staking is. The textbook definition is the delegation of your tokens to a third party, which does the staking for you. Said third party then issues you a separate token, for which is redeemable for the underlying asset. Some common examples are outlined below:

1. Liquid Staked AVAX (sAVAX) – A derivative token of staked AVAX. Benqi Finance is the third party issuing sAVAX.

2. Liquid Staked DOT (LDOT) – A derivative token of staked DOT. Acala is the third party issuing LDOT.

So, why do DeFi users use liquid staking? The reason is that it allows their tokens to remain liquid, while the underlying asset is staked for yield and securing the network. Using stETH as an example, staking your ETH through Lido Finance allows you to:

1. Support the Ethereum 2.0 Beacon Chain.

2. Earn an APR of 4% per year.

3. Receive stETH, which then allows you to participate in trading, lending, liquidity pools, yield farming, etc.

The above sounds all rosy, right? But that only works when one stETH is always worth one ETH or slightly more.

stETH De-pegs From ETH

As of today, stETH currently sits at 0.94 ETH. There are a few reasons why this has happened:

1. No arbitrage opportunity – Other liquid staked assets can easily recover peg as eager arbitrageurs will look to buy cheap liquid staked assets and swap them back to the underlying asset for a profit. However, stETH cannot be easily redeemed for ETH. Stakers can only redeem their ETH once ETH 2.0 launches.

2. Delay in the ETH 2.0 launch – Multiple delays have caused investors to worry. This is further aggravated along with the current bearish sentiment.

Enter Celsius – The First Victim

When there’s money to be made in DeFi, you can be sure there are big companies eager to pounce. Enter Celsius – a crypto lending platform holding tons of stETH. In fact, Celsius is the largest holder of stETH on Aave.

In the current fearful market sentiment, coupled with bad memories from the recent UST de-peg, holders of stETH rush to sell their holdings. This further exacerbates the de-pegging, thus destroying the value of Celsius’ stETH holdings. This led to fears of Celsius’ insolvency, which, in turn, triggered large withdrawals from their platform. In addition, Celsius does not have a good history of managing their users’ money well. You can read more about this in our recent research here.

Note: If Celsius is insolvent, investors with crypto on their platform may not get their deposit back.

As of today, Celsius has halted all withdrawals from their platform, further fueling the fears of its users. There is no doubt that Celsius is now plagued with liquidity issues. They’re facing tremendous pressure to return users their funds. Unsurprisingly, Celsius’ token (CEL) has taken a nosedive and dropped 95% from its all-time high.

The Effect of the stETH/ETH De-peg

While investors were barely recovering from the UST de-peg, stETH’s de-peg came along. Although it did not have the dramatic spikes of LUNA and UST, it did further destroy retail sentiment towards DeFi. Indeed, protocols for other liquid staked assets were quick to come out on Twitter to justify the strength of their asset’s peg.

The de-pegging of stETH also resulted in a huge dump in price of ETH, along with many other altcoins. ETH currently sits at more than 70% below its all-time high, and all Layer 1 altcoins face drawdowns of a similar amount or greater. Needless to say, DeFi-related altcoins like Aave and YFI were hit worse.

Insolvency of the Once-Great Crypto Giants

If I were asked, “What are the main differences between the bear market of 2018 versus today?” My answers would be: 1) interconnectedness between multiple protocols and 2) DeFi. When Terraform Labs and their once-thriving LUNA ecosystem crumbled, it raised the all-important question amongst retail crypto investors: How badly were companies holding LUNA and UST affected?

In today’s crypto world, the damage of one major protocol’s downfall is never limited to just that party. Multiple companies are invested in each other’s products, just like how Celsius holds a ton of Lido Finance’s stETH. Think about the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis, whereby financial institutions fell one after another. For now, Celsius faces liquidity issues due to bad bets and the stETH de-peg. But come tomorrow, another once-great crypto “giant” may face the axe soon due to Celsius’ fall. In this case, the “interconnectedness” of crypto acts as a double-edged sword which worsens the bear market during such tough times.

During the bear market in 2018, there were barely any signs of DeFi on-chain. Today, DeFi has progressed significantly. Crypto companies can easily use users’ crypto for risky plays, such as for collateral or over-leveraged trades. Greed was at its highest level during the 2021 bull market. Now, crypto companies face liquidations as prices tumble. This, in turn, creates a cascading effect of liquidations on DeFi, which wipes out more crypto investors.

Conclusion

So that summarizes the causes of stETH’s de-peg and its potential adverse effects on the crypto market. We hope Celsius is able to overcome its current issues and resume withdrawals for users soon. However, please note that this is not financial advice and that you should do your own research on how to deal with the current stETH/ETH de-pegging situation.

Letture associate

$9.4 Billion: The Largest Robotics Funding This Year Has Emerged

Munich-based humanoid robotics company Neura has completed a $1.4 billion (approximately RMB 94.9 billion) Series C funding round, valuing the company at around $7 billion and positioning it among the global leaders in the sector. The investment round is notable not just for its size—reportedly the largest in robotics this year—but also for its strategic backers, which include tech giants like NVIDIA and Amazon, alongside established industrial players such as German engineering firms Bosch and Schaeffler. This mix of investors signals a significant shift in the industry's focus from technological demonstrations and general-purpose narratives toward practical, industrial deployment and commercialization. Neura's approach centers on developing humanoid robots for defined, high-value industrial tasks rather than pursuing a general-purpose model. Its early validation comes from a partnership with BMW, where its robots are being tested on actual production lines. The involvement of Bosch and Schaeffler, companies deeply embedded in global manufacturing, underscores a growing belief that humanoid robots are transitioning from labs to viable factory-floor solutions. The article highlights two converging trends driving investment: advancements in AI and large language models, which enhance robots' perception and decision-making in unstructured environments, and mounting pressure from labor shortages and rising costs in major manufacturing regions. The funding landscape is now bifurcating between companies like Figure AI, focusing on versatile general-purpose robots, and firms like Neura, targeting specific vertical industrial applications with clearer, shorter paths to ROI. While technical hurdles remain, the core challenges for widespread adoption are increasingly seen as engineering and commercial in nature: managing the high integration and customization costs for different factory environments and establishing robust, localized maintenance and service networks. The record investment in Neura, particularly from industrial capital, indicates the industry's growing confidence in moving from proving feasibility to solving the practical problems of scalability, reliability, and building sustainable business models around humanoid robots in real-world settings like automotive manufacturing and hazardous labor environments.

marsbit9 h fa

$9.4 Billion: The Largest Robotics Funding This Year Has Emerged

marsbit9 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片