South Korea To Ease Institutional Crypto Investment Restrictions This Year

bitcoinistPubblicato 2025-01-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-01-09

Introduzione

Recent reports revealed that South Korea is set to ease its restrictions on institutional crypto investment. Secretary-General of South Korea’s...

Recent reports revealed that South Korea is set to ease its restrictions on institutional crypto investment. Secretary-General of South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) announced the watchdog’s plan to review its restrictions amid the ongoing changes in South Korea’s regulatory approach.

FSC Planning To Ease Restrictions

On Wednesday, Yonhap News Agency reported that FSC’s Secretary-General Kwon Dae-young announced legal entities will be allowed to invest in cryptocurrencies starting this year. Kwon stated that the regulatory agency plans to relax its restrictions on institutional crypto trading and investment to “strengthen collaboration between financial institutions and fintechs.”

According to the report, the FSC is set to consider a proposal to allow the issuance of real-name accounts to corporations, which is currently restricted. Real-name accounts are required for virtual asset investments, as only the accounts that have completed this verification under the Specified Financial Transaction Information Act are allowed to invest in digital assets.

Nonetheless, financial authorities have limited institutional crypto trading by guiding banks not to issue these accounts to corporations, despite the absence of any legal barrier or official ban.

In the “Major Work Plan for 2025,” the FSC revealed this change would be gradually implemented, with the financial regulator working on a “detailed plan” to allow non-profit corporations first through its Virtual Asset Committee, and slowly expand.

Moreover, the South Korean watchdog plans to promote the second phase of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, which includes regulations on the distribution of digital assets.

The FSC’s Secretary-General explained that the regulator needs “to discuss how to create listing standards, how to deal with stablecoins, and how to create rules for the behavior of virtual asset exchanges,” adding that the government will align with global crypto regulations.

Additionally, the report notes that the FSC plans to introduce a “screening system for the eligibility of major shareholders of virtual asset operators through amendments to the Special Financial Transactions Act.”

The regulator will also work on improving self-regulation by implementing criteria for reviewing memecoins and other cryptocurrencies to protect investors, and it will introduce forensic equipment to investigate unlawful trading behavior.

South Korea’s Changing Crypto Landscape

Over the last few years, South Korea has attempted to shift to a more regulated and stable environment for investors. Kora Exchange’s Chairman, Jeong Eun-bo, has called for a change in lawmakers’ and financial institutions’ view of crypto assets.

Jeong suggested that the country’s regulator consider incorporating virtual assets into institutional finance to revitalize the market, “create added value,” and compete with other countries.

It is worth noting that the FSC’s stance on virtual assets has been criticized for seemingly challenging the market’s development and international competitiveness.

Nonetheless, the ongoing shift has seen the creation of the Virtual Asset Committee to advise and discuss industry-related policies. Moreover, the FSC announced that this group would soon review the long-standing ban on crypto-based investment products.

As reported by Bitcoinist, Jeong announced the Korea Exchange’s plan to explore crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in 2025 after the country’s capital markets faced substantial challenges in 2024.

Additionally, the country has postponed the crypto taxation policy by two years. The policy, previously set to be introduced in January 2025, will collect 20% capital gains tax from investors trading digital assets. Following the delay, the tax policy is expected to be implemented in 2027.

crypto

Total crypto market capitalization is at $3.27 trillion in the one-week chart. Source: TOTAL on TradingView
Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com
Rubmar Garcia

Rubmar Garcia

Rubmar is a crypto enthusiast who likes learning and improving constantly. She enjoys reporting on the latest news and developments in the crypto industry. Rubmar also enjoys scrapbooking, crafting, simulation games, and watching football.

Letture associate

Warsh's First Day in Office, Markets Deliver a 'Wake-up Call': Rate Hike Expected This Year

On his first day in office, newly inaugurated Federal Reserve Chairman Warsh received a stark market warning, with expectations now fully pricing in a 25-basis-point interest rate hike this year. The shift was triggered by hawkish remarks from Fed Governor Waller, who stated that inflation is now the key policy "driver" and that the odds of a hike or cut are evenly split. This sent short-term Treasury yields higher. Waller signaled a significant pivot in his stance, citing disappointing inflation and labor data. He suggested removing "easing bias" language from Fed statements and did not rule out future rate increases if inflation fails to recede, though he noted immediate action isn't warranted without signs of unanchored inflation expectations. Chairman Warsh faces immediate pressure at his first FOMC meeting in June. With the preferred inflation gauge at a three-year high, analysts warn that failing to hike could be interpreted as an implicit easing of policy. The geopolitical situation in the Middle East is adding to existing price pressures. The market's expectation for a hike contrasts sharply with earlier forecasts for multiple cuts. While long-term Treasury yields have been contained by lower energy prices recently, analysts note they remain under structural upward pressure. Warsh's swearing-in at the White House highlights political scrutiny over Fed independence. However, the market has made it clear that inflation is the most urgent challenge, leaving the new chairman little time to settle in.

marsbit26 min fa

Warsh's First Day in Office, Markets Deliver a 'Wake-up Call': Rate Hike Expected This Year

marsbit26 min fa

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

Microsoft, once seen as an early AI frontrunner due to its investment in OpenAI, is navigating a strategic shift amid increased competition. Its initial reliance on OpenAI’s GPT models has been complicated by OpenAI’s growing ambitions as a direct competitor, rapid advancements from rivals like Claude and Gemini, and the disruptive rise of AI agents, which challenge its traditional SaaS business model. These factors contributed to stock declines and slower-than-expected adoption of its flagship Copilot products. In response, CEO Satya Nadella has taken a hands-on role in product development, signaling the urgency of change. Microsoft is pivoting from a model-centric strategy to a "model-agnostic" enterprise platform approach. It aims to become the foundational layer connecting various AI models—from OpenAI, Anthropic, or its own new "Superintelligence" team—with enterprise workflows, data, security, and cloud services. Recent organizational changes merged consumer and enterprise Copilot teams to accelerate innovation, exemplified by new products like Copilot Tasks and Copilot Cowork. However, this transformation comes at a high cost. Microsoft faces massive capital expenditures, potentially reaching ~$190 billion by 2026, to support AI infrastructure. While its platform strategy shows early signs of traction with growing Azure AI revenue, it must balance startup-like agility with the reliability expected by enterprise clients. The core challenge is no longer being the sole AI winner but defending its position as the essential enterprise software entry point amidst rapid technological commoditization and the shift towards always-on AI agents.

marsbit1 h fa

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

marsbit1 h fa

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

Why FX Stablecoins Never Took Off: A Path Forward via Synthetic FX Despite the explosive growth of stablecoin-powered digital banking, which has seen ~$6B in VC investment and a 24x surge in crypto card spending in under a year, a major limitation persists: these banks are essentially dollar-only accounts. This leaves 95-99% of global accounts, which are denominated in non-USD currencies, underserved. Attempts to create native foreign currency (FX) stablecoins (like EURC) have largely failed, with total FX stablecoin TVL at ~$600M compared to $400B for USD stablecoins—a 700x gap. These FX tokens face critical challenges: fragile pegs due to low liquidity, limited exchange/FinTech acceptance, poor on/off-ramps, complex regional compliance, and a chicken-and-egg adoption problem. The article argues that the solution lies not in competing with entrenched USD stablecoin networks (USDT/USDC), but in adopting a synthetic FX model inspired by traditional finance. Specifically, it advocates for Mark-to-Market Non-Deliverable Forwards (NDFs)—cash-settled FX derivatives that allow users to maintain underlying USD stablecoin holdings while having their account balance and P&L denominated in a foreign currency. This approach offers key advantages: strong oracle-based pegs, retention of deep USD stablecoin liquidity and yield, superior on/off-ramps, scalability to any currency with a reliable feed, and capital efficiency. It mirrors how modern institutional FX markets operate. Primary use cases for on-chain NDFs include: 1. **Digital Banks/Wallets:** Enabling multi-currency accounts for international users without leaving the USD stablecoin ecosystem, boosting deposits and retention. 2. **FX Carry Trade Vaults:** Offering access to sovereign interest rate differentials (e.g., earning yield on BRL) in a more stable and scalable format than crypto-native products like Ethena. 3. **Global Enterprise Payments:** Allowing merchants to receive payments in local currency equivalents while settling in USD stablecoins, similar to services offered by Stripe for fiat. The conclusion is that synthetic FX, not native FX stablecoins, is the viable path to integrating foreign exchange into the growing stablecoin digital banking landscape, potentially unlocking the next phase of institutional DeFi and multi-trillion-dollar global adoption.

链捕手1 h fa

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

链捕手1 h fa

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is "Bleeding Out" – How Can Practitioners Survive Better? In a candid reflection, the founder of IOSG Ventures voices deep concerns about the current state of Web3, describing an ecosystem experiencing severe "blood loss." Despite the recent MuShanghai event showcasing a successful pivot towards a more diverse, global community, a somber reality persists: many crypto-native attendees were there exploring exits or new labels in biotech, AI, and robotics. The core issue is identified as a breakdown in the ecosystem's positive feedback loop. Alarmingly, underestimated "low-probability bad events" are occurring simultaneously: a significant brain drain of Chinese developers to AI, a lack of breakout applications despite massive funding, and a widening credibility gap for practitioners globally, often stigmatized as scam artists. This has created a dire接班人 (successor) problem, with the next generation seeing little professional prestige or financial upside in crypto compared to fields like AI. A significant portion of the critique focuses on Ethereum and Vitalik Buterin. While not pessimistic about Ethereum's technology, the founder worries that critical development windows were missed by focusing on niche technical narratives like ZK and L2 instead of mass-market applications. A more urgent concern is that Vitalik may be isolated in an "information bubble," shielded from the grassroots community's hardships by layers of intermediaries, preventing crucial feedback from reaching him. The call is for Vitalik to return to a founder's mindset, re-engage directly with the community, and rally efforts for the next decade. The divergence between U.S. and Chinese OG (Original Gangster) ecosystems is stark. While many U.S. builders reinvest their wealth into the ecosystem, the Chinese scene suffers from a severe lack of "造血能力" (blood-making ability), with most market-driven funds struggling and many early success stories cashing out entirely. This threatens the entire Asian Web3 ecosystem's survival. For individual practitioners, survival advice is pragmatic: find your core "why," maintain life balance beyond token prices, continuously learn new skills (like AI), form small, trusted alliances for mutual support, and practice self-compassion. The industry's greatest need is not money or tech, but lighthouses—individuals at all levels who offer mentorship, grants, referrals, and honest reflection to guide others. The piece concludes with a direct appeal: OGs must pay forward the opportunities the industry gave them; founders must not struggle alone; and builders must continue their work, ensuring it remains a viable profession. The survival of Web3's "cathedral" depends not on any single leader but on the collective responsibility of everyone who remains.

marsbit2 h fa

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片