Sonic Labs 推出 Sonic 主网:EVM 兼容、可验证的 10,000 TPS 和亚秒级最终性

链捕手Pubblicato 2024-12-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-12-22

Sonic Labs推出Sonic主网:EVM兼容、可验证的10,000 TPS和亚秒级最终性

Sonic Labs 今天宣布推出 Sonic 主网,这是一个 EVM 兼容的第一层区块链平台,为开发者提供了有吸引力的激励和强大的基础设施。

Sonic 主网支持每秒 10, 000 笔交易(TPS)、亚秒级最终性,并提供一个原生的去中心化以太坊网关,使开发者能够在无与伦比的基础设施和流动性上构建下一代应用程序。

Sonic 由 Fantom 团队开发,其 S 代币在多个方面显著超越了 Fantom 和 FTM。通过 FTM 到 S 的 1: 1 升级过程,现有的 FTM 持有者可以无缝地开始使用 Sonic。

Sonic 利用经过验证的专业知识,通过革命性的开发者激励机制,确立自己作为 DeFi 中心的地位,同时为用户提供流畅的用户体验和丰富的流动性。

费用货币化:开发者优先

Sonic 上的费用货币化(Fee Monetization,FeeM)奖励开发者高达 90% 的网络费用,这些费用由他们的应用程序产生,采用了类似于 YouTube 等平台流行的Web2广告收入策略。虽然许多区块链提供有限的开发者激励,并主要关注价值提取,但 Sonic 通过其 FeeM 模型有效地解决了这一问题。

“最近,我们看到许多新链的推出,尤其是集中式的第二层链,创始人将所有网络费用收入囊中。这使得开发者被排除在外,迫使他们向用户收取额外费用以获得收入。FeeM 通过将开发者奖励直接编码到链中来解决这个问题,确保网络费用从一开始就与开发者共享。”——Sonic Labs 业务发展负责人 Sam Harcourt

Sonic 链上的开发者将根据他们的应用程序吸引的流量和参与度获得网络费用的份额,提供了一种持续收入的内置机制。

Fantom 到 Sonic:将 FTM 升级为 S

Fantom 及其 FTM 代币正式过渡到 Sonic 和 S 代币。Sonic Labs 通过在 MySonic 上提供专门的升级门户,帮助 FTM 持有者无缝地将 FTM 以 1: 1 的比例升级为 S。

“我们很自豪地推出新的 Sonic 链,作为 Fantom 的下一次进化,基于自 2019 年以来近 100% 的正常运行时间的卓越记录。Sonic 是一个革命性的平台,优先考虑开发者,使他们能够创建具有流畅用户体验的应用程序,同时获得网络费用的份额。”——Sonic Labs 首席执行官 Michael Kong

在 Sonic 主网启动后的最初 90 天内,持有者可以通过升级门户自由地在 FTM 和 S 之间进行交换。在此之后,持有者将只能将 FTM 升级为 S。

Sonic 网关:安全、去中心化的互操作性

随着跨链活动的增加,安全和无信任的桥梁变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。传统的第一层和第二层桥接解决方案通常依赖于集中式系统,面临数十亿美元的潜在损失风险。

Sonic 网关作为以太坊和 Sonic 之间的去中心化和无信任的桥梁,解决了这些挑战,提供:

  • 安全性:如果网关在 14 天内出现故障,故障保护机制确保用户资金可以在以太坊上恢复,保证资产安全。

  • 速度:资产转移高效批处理(每 10 分钟从以太坊到 Sonic,每小时反向转移)。快速通道功能允许用户支付少量费用以立即桥接。

  • 去中心化:由 Sonic 在两个链上的验证者运营,网关与 Sonic 本身一样去中心化,防止集中式操控。

“为了让用户有效且无需信任地控制他们的资产,我们开发了 Sonic 网关,提供来自其他平台的流动性。由我们自己的验证者提供支持,并通过故障保护机制确保安全,网关使用户和应用程序能够安全地利用将新流动性引入 Sonic 的好处和激励。”——Sonic Labs 首席研究官 Bernhard Scholz

Sonic Labs 将在未来将网关扩展到以太坊以外,允许直接、去中心化地访问多个区块链的原生资产。

Sonic 空投:分发 S 代币

为了鼓励网络增长,Sonic Labs 通过一个针对用户和开发者的空投计划分发 1.905 亿个 S 代币。该计划包括两种激励结构:

  • Sonic 积分:奖励终端用户的早期采用、资产持有和整体参与。

  • Sonic 宝石:奖励开发者创建推动用户活动和创新的应用程序。开发者可以将宝石转换为 S,并与他们的用户分享代币,以激励持续使用。

关于 Sonic

Sonic 是一个 EVM 第一层平台,为开发者提供有吸引力的激励和强大的基础设施。该链提供超过 10, 000 TPS、亚秒级确认时间,并为增强流动性和资产安全提供安全的以太坊网关。

有关更多信息,用户可以访问Sonic 的官方网站并关注Sonic 的 Twitter

Letture associate

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手4 h fa

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手4 h fa

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbit4 h fa

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit4 h fa

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手5 h fa

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手5 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片