South Korea Crisis Sparks $34.2 Billion Explosion In Crypto Market

bitcoinistPubblicato 2024-12-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-12-06

Introduzione

Last Tuesday, South Korea President Yoon Suk Yeol surprised the country by declaring a martial law. The President’s surprise announcement,...

Last Tuesday, South Korea President Yoon Suk Yeol surprised the country by declaring a martial law. The President’s surprise announcement, later reversed, created political chaos and rattled the markets.

South Korea’s stock market fell in Wednesday morning trading and the benchmark Kospi dipped by 2% as a result of the tumult. Even before the markets opened, the country’s vice minister for economy and finance stated that the government was ready to infuse almost $7 billion to stabilize the market.

As major Kospi stocks fell, SoKor’s crypto trading volume surged to $34.2 billion across popular exchanges like Bithumb, Upbit, Gopax, and Korbit. Upbit processed most crypto transactions worth $27.25 billion, underscoring its dominance in the country’s crypto market.

Bitcoin’s price also briefly dipped in Korea’s crypto exchanges due to a lack of liquidity, highlighting the vulnerability of the country’s crypto market.

Volatile Trading Session

South Korean stocks responded negatively to the president’s flip-flop. The country’s vice chair for economy and finance announced that the administration is ready to deploy up to $7 billion to address a potential market chaos.

Bitcoin is currently trading at $103,431. Chart: TradingView

On Wednesday trading, the country’s popular stocks, like Samsung and LG Energ Solution, dropped by 1% and 2.8%, respectively.

The country’s crypto market also saw a surge in activities, nearly doubling the $18 billion record set on December 2nd. According to South Korea’s cryptocurrency news outlet KWNews, this was the highest single-day total for crypto trading for the year.

Martial Law Flip-Flop Sows Crypto Market Chaos

The country’s crypto sector also reacted negatively to the political chaos last Tuesday. During the 6-hour martial law, Bitcoin’s price dipped to 88 million won or $62,182 in popular crypto exchanges, reflecting a sell-off. As many holders and traders panicked to sell BTC and crypto, some exchanges have encountered outages.

Just hours after declaring martial law, the president immediately rescinded the order, which helped stabilize the markets. The country’s opposition immediately set to work and filed charges of treason against the president, with some campaigning for impeachment.

South Korea Political Instability Can Impact Liquidity

Although Bitcoin’s price and the overall crypto market immediately stabilized Wednesday, the political crisis highlighted the vulnerability of the country’s markets to liquidity shocks. Any political instability, like the declaration of martial law, can impact cryptos’ prices.

South Korea’s political drama has also caught the attention of crypto betting markets and crypto commentators. On Polymarket, the odds of a $500k bet on President Yoon’s early exit reached a high of 78% before stabilizing at 47%.

Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

Christian Encila

Christian Encila

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Letture associate

The AI Stock Genius Who Made 60x Bets $7.7 Billion on Nvidia Topping Out

An AI-focused hedge fund named Situational Awareness LP, known for its 60x returns, has taken a significant bearish stance on semiconductor stocks in Q1 2026. Its 13F filing reveals a massive 148% quarterly increase in nominal exposure to $13.677 billion, with over 60% of the new exposure directed towards put options on major chip players. Key bearish bets include $2.04 billion in puts on the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and $1.56 billion on NVIDIA, alongside positions against Broadcom, Oracle, AMD, and others. The fund simultaneously increased its long equity holdings in AI infrastructure and compute providers like CoreWeave and Bitcoin mining companies repurposing for compute. The core thesis behind this positioning is a shift in the primary constraint for AI expansion. The fund argues that while GPU supply was the critical bottleneck in previous years, the new limiting factors for large-scale AI cluster deployment are physical infrastructure: electrical grid access (with multi-year backlogs in the US), power availability, land, and data center construction timelines. The fund is not betting against AI's success but rather hedging against potential valuation corrections in semiconductor stocks whose prices may have run ahead, while directly investing in the downstream physical bottlenecks—power and data center capacity—it believes will capture value next. This move translates a previously theoretical narrative about infrastructure constraints into a concrete, high-conviction portfolio structure.

链捕手50 min fa

The AI Stock Genius Who Made 60x Bets $7.7 Billion on Nvidia Topping Out

链捕手50 min fa

Deep Dissection of the Anthropic Account Banning Storm: The Behind-the-Scenes of the Safety Religion, AI Civil War, and Claude's Dilemma Under US-China Decoupling

"Deconstructing Anthropic's Account Banning Storm: Safety Dogma, AI Civil War, and the Claude Dilemma Under US-China Decoupling" analyzes the aggressive user account suspension policies of Anthropic, particularly for its product Claude Code. The article attributes this to a multi-layered convergence of factors. The root cause is traced to founder Dario Amodei's personal "safety religion." Shaped by his father's illness and his exit from OpenAI over safety disagreements with Sam Altman, Amodei embedded this "zero-tolerance" philosophy into Anthropic's DNA. This manifests in technologies like Constitutional AI and a "preventive enforcement" approach to risk, prioritizing safety over user experience or growth. This stance defines Anthropic's position in the US "AI Civil War," pitting "safety-first" proponents like Amodei against "accelerationists" like Altman who prioritize rapid development and commercialization. Anthropic's strict model aligns with its business strategy targeting high-value, low-risk enterprise clients who pay a premium for security, unlike OpenAI's mass-market approach. Capital from Amazon and Google supports Anthropic but also creates a delicate balance, as these investors need its safety reputation without allowing overly restrictive policies to cripple its commercial viability. The conflict escalated when Anthropic refused a US Department of Defense contract requiring the removal of safety guardrails, leading to its placement on a "supply chain risk" blacklist—a key example of the public battle between the two AI factions. For Chinese users, the stringent bans are further compounded by US-China tech decoupling. Anthropic's policies act as a tool for compliance with US export controls, making Chinese users—who often circumvent regional blocks via VPNs or virtual cards—primary targets for "preventive" account terminations to avoid regulatory penalties. The article concludes that Anthropic's harsh account control measures are unlikely to loosen in the near future, being integral to its founding philosophy, business model, and geopolitical compliance needs, positioning it as a unique, security-obsessed player in the tripartite global AI competition involving US safety and acceleration factions and rising Chinese AI power.

marsbit1 h fa

Deep Dissection of the Anthropic Account Banning Storm: The Behind-the-Scenes of the Safety Religion, AI Civil War, and Claude's Dilemma Under US-China Decoupling

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片