Компания Robinhood разрешит делать ставки на президентские выборы

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2024-04-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-10-29

Компания Robinhood объявила, что её подразделение по работе с деривативами запустило контракты на президентские выборы в США. Теперь пользователи платформы смогут делать ставки на исход президентских выборов, которые пройдут 5 ноября 2024 года.

Согласно заявлению компании, контракты будут оплачены после того, как 6 января 2025 года Конгресс США утвердит результаты выборов. Есть и ещё одно ограничение — ставки могут делать только граждане Соединённых Штатов, но не все. Например, контракты не смогут покупать работники предвыборных штабов кандидатов от Республиканской и Демократической партий.

Robinhood стремится демократизировать финансы для всех, независимо от того, кто находится у власти. И хотя мы позволяем нашим клиентам делать ставки на исход президентских выборов 2024 года, результаты и колебания рынка в реальном времени не указывают на поддержку Robinhood ни одного из кандидатов, — говорится на официальном сайте компании.

Robinhood присоединилась к рынку прогнозирования после того, как в начале октября платформа для ставок Kalshi выиграла в суде дело против Комиссии по торговле товарными фьючерсами США. Это позволило площадке и дальше предлагать американским пользователям ставки на результаты выборов.

Letture associate

How Celestia’s network upgrade triggered TIA’s 102% volume surge

Celestia's network upgrade on July 1st successfully triggered a significant market response. The price of TIA increased by over 10%, and its daily trading volume surged by 102% to $59.5 million. This rally was primarily driven by renewed spot market participation. However, a divergence emerged: while spot buying was strong, futures market data indicated persistent selling pressure and cautious sentiment among derivatives traders. Despite this, bullish leverage remained in place with positive funding rates. Technically, TIA approached a key resistance level at $0.4045, with a potential breakout above it targeting the next resistance at $0.5000. The market structure showed a contrast between optimistic spot activity and skeptical futures positioning.

ambcrypto19 min fa

How Celestia’s network upgrade triggered TIA’s 102% volume surge

ambcrypto19 min fa

CLARITY Act Countdown: How Will the Crypto Market Fare If It Doesn't Pass Before the August Recess?

The CLARITY Act, a major US crypto market structure bill, faces a tight deadline before the Senate's August 10 recess. It must overcome final hurdles—negotiations on ethics provisions and law enforcement concerns—to secure the 60 votes needed for passage. Analysts warn that missing this window significantly lowers its chances in 2026, with prediction markets giving only a 40% probability of success this year. If the act fails to pass by the recess, the market is expected to react not with a crash but with continued "slow bleeding," particularly in premium products like ETFs. June saw record net outflows from US Bitcoin spot ETFs, partly attributed to this legislative uncertainty. Assets like XRP, which would receive permanent commodity classification under the act, stand to lose a "regulatory premium" on further delays. Bitcoin and Ethereum, already classified as commodities by regulators, face less direct impact, but DeFi innovation and institutional capital inflows would remain stifled by regulatory ambiguity. The path forward includes passing before the recess (a major catalyst), postponement to 2027 (prolonging uncertainty), or failure, requiring the bill to be reintroduced in the next Congress. Despite the stalled negotiations, the bill's advancement this far signals the US is closer than ever to resolving crypto regulatory clarity.

marsbit2 h fa

CLARITY Act Countdown: How Will the Crypto Market Fare If It Doesn't Pass Before the August Recess?

marsbit2 h fa

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: A Nuanced Competitive Reshuffle The launch of OUSD, a new stablecoin initiative, has complex implications for the stablecoin market. For Circle (CRCL), the initial 15-20% stock drop reflects legitimate competitive concerns but is not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantages. A potential restructuring or termination of its Coinbase partnership could even double its net revenue in the short term, providing more competitive freedom. However, OUSD, backed by Stripe's engineering and product strengths, could become the default stablecoin within the Stripe ecosystem for new adopters, challenging USDC's position. OUSD does not solve the core barrier for corporate adoption: it remains a credit exposure to its issuer (likely a Bridge-related entity), which, like Circle, is not an investment-grade entity. Large banks and asset managers could still capture the most lucrative enterprise use cases. Circle must accelerate its payment/fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. For Tether, OUSD targets a different market segment. Tether will continue focusing on distribution channels not prioritized by Stripe or Circle. Its market share may decline over time, but within a significantly growing total market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the key selling points of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may diminish as frameworks mature. This poses a more existential challenge, explaining Paxos's recent shift back to its brokerage-as-a-service business.

marsbit2 h fa

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

marsbit2 h fa

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Reshuffle

This article analyzes the impact of the newly announced stablecoin OUSD, backed by a consortium including Stripe, on major incumbents like Circle (USDC), Tether (USDT), and Paxos (USDG). For Circle, the announcement is not a simple negative. While the initial market reaction was rational, it's not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantage. A potential restructuring or termination of its exclusive revenue-sharing deal with Coinbase could even near-double its net income in the short term, providing more competitive flexibility. However, within the Stripe ecosystem, OUSD, with its strong engineering and product focus, could become the default choice, displacing USDC for new integrations. Circle must accelerate its own fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. OUSD does not directly threaten Tether's core markets, which focus on different distribution channels. Tether's market share may decline over time but within a significantly growing overall market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the primary value proposition of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may erode as frameworks mature, posing a more existential challenge. This explains Paxos's recent strategic pivot towards brokerage-as-a-service. A fundamental unresolved issue for enterprise adoption remains: if issued by a Bridge-related entity, OUSD, like USDC, still represents a credit exposure to a non-investment-grade issuer, unless a parent company guarantee is provided. Large banks and asset managers entering the space later could still compete for the most lucrative enterprise use cases.

链捕手2 h fa

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Reshuffle

链捕手2 h fa

Will this Senator’s crypto bill force Trump out of the memecoin business?

In a July press release, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand addressed ethical concerns regarding former President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency involvement. Trump's 2025 financial disclosure, filed with the Office of Government Ethics, revealed he earned over $1.4 billion from crypto ventures. The primary source was $636 million from CIC Digital LLC, which licenses the official TRUMP memecoin. In response, Senator Gillibrand is pushing legislation to prohibit elected officials, including the President, Vice President, Congress members, and their spouses, from issuing, promoting, or sponsoring digital assets while in office. The proposal aims to prevent self-dealing and restore public trust. Gillibrand argues that such a ban is a commonsense, bipartisan measure necessary to strengthen consumer protections and stop officials from profiting from their office.

ambcrypto2 h fa

Will this Senator’s crypto bill force Trump out of the memecoin business?

ambcrypto2 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片