Tapioca Foundation предложил вознаграждение в $1 млн за возврат $4,7 млн

investing.ruPubblicato 2024-10-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-10-21

Happycoin.club - Фонд Tapioca Foundation объявил о вознаграждении в размере $1 млн за возврат $4,7 млн, украденных из его протокола децентрализованных финансов. Фонд предложил выплатить деньги в стейблконах Tether (USDT). Интересно, что заявленное вознаграждение значительно превышает 10%, которые обычно дают в таких ситуациях.

Накануне разработчики протокола отправили на криптокошелёк злоумышленника сообщение с предложением о вознаграждении.

Мы хотели бы предложить вам привлекательное вознаграждение, которое позволит вам сохранить часть средств, которые будут принадлежать вам по закону и без каких-либо дополнительных условий, — говорится в сообщении.

Хакерская атака с использованием социальной инженерии на протокол Tapioca прошла 18 октября. Тогда разработчики проекта сообщили, что злоумышленник вывел почти 30 млн токенов TAP из контракта на передачу прав собственности. Затем он обменял их на примерно $1,5 млн в Ethereum (ETH), а потом конвертировал их в стейблкоины USDT, которые направил в BNB Chain.

В результате атаки токен TAP, представленный Tapioca DAO в июне 2024 года, фактически потерял всю свою ценность. Согласно данным сайта-агрегатора Coingecko, актив опустился с $1,40 до 2 центов после объявление об атаке хакера.

Читайте оригинальную статью на сайте Happycoin.club

Letture associate

Holding 4% of Global Bitcoin! Market Closely Watches MSTR's "Bitcoin Selling Logic", Stock Price Has Fallen 75% in a Year

MicroStrategy, the world's largest corporate holder of Bitcoin (approx. 4% of supply), faces mounting liquidity pressures, forcing a shift from its "never sell" pledge. The company recently sold 3,588 BTC for $216 million, its largest sale ever, to cover preferred stock dividends, marking a significant scaling up from a small, symbolic sale in May. This move underscores a fundamental challenge to its business model: using stock premium as "currency" to buy Bitcoin continuously. A key metric, mNAV (enterprise value vs. Bitcoin holdings), has fallen below 1, indicating the market values the company below its Bitcoin stash, eroding its core acquisition logic. With annual dividend obligations around $1.5 billion and software cash flow insufficient, MicroStrategy is caught in a mathematical bind. Its $2.55 billion cash buffer provides ~17 months of coverage, but if financing remains tight and mNAV stays depressed, the company may face pressure for larger Bitcoin sales, posing a potential systemic risk to the crypto market given its massive holdings.

华尔街日报2 min fa

Holding 4% of Global Bitcoin! Market Closely Watches MSTR's "Bitcoin Selling Logic", Stock Price Has Fallen 75% in a Year

华尔街日报2 min fa

Mt. Gox Wallet Sends 47,228 BTC To Bitstamp As Creditor Repayments Accelerate

Mt. Gox-linked wallets transferred 47,228 BTC to Bitstamp-linked addresses, marking a significant step in the active creditor repayment process. This on-chain move shifts the long-awaited repayments from administrative procedures to tangible market events. The transfer is part of a structured distribution via designated exchange partners like Bitstamp, not an arbitrary sell-off. While the move signals progress, a key market uncertainty remains: how much of this Bitcoin will creditors ultimately sell? Traders are monitoring for potential sell pressure, but the market impact will depend on whether creditors hold or sell and on overall market liquidity to absorb any sales. The situation has now moved from anticipation to real-time observation.

bitcoinist15 min fa

Mt. Gox Wallet Sends 47,228 BTC To Bitstamp As Creditor Repayments Accelerate

bitcoinist15 min fa

What's It Like Working with Two "Madmen": Peter Thiel and Elon Musk? Palantir Co-founder Shares His Experience

Joe Lonsdale, co-founder of Palantir and a member of the "PayPal Mafia," shared his experiences working alongside Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. He described both as highly opinionated, ambitious, and intolerant of broken systems, demanding immediate fixes and rapid execution. Thiel is characterized as a strategic philosopher, while Musk is a hands-on engineer deeply involved in technical details. Musk is noted as one of the hardest workers Lonsdale has ever seen, a trait common in PayPal's early, passionate culture that later spawned numerous billion-dollar companies. Lonsdale recounted Palantir's origin story. While working at Thiel's hedge fund, he and Thiel discussed how Silicon Valley's technology far outpaced the government's, especially after 9/11. They saw an opportunity to build a platform to help stop terrorist attacks while protecting civil liberties. Their initial venture capital pitches were met with rejection and ridicule. However, Thiel viewed this as motivation. Critical funding eventually came from the CIA's venture arm and Thiel himself. Reflecting on Palantir's impact, Lonsdale believes their work helped neutralize thousands of terrorists and ensured government oversight, though he acknowledges the potential dangers if such powerful technology is misused. His key takeaway echoes Thiel's early advice: being rejected and laughed at can fuel the determination to prove the doubters wrong.

marsbit28 min fa

What's It Like Working with Two "Madmen": Peter Thiel and Elon Musk? Palantir Co-founder Shares His Experience

marsbit28 min fa

Cardano Budget Process Puts ADA Treasury Spending Back In Focus

Cardano's 2026 ecosystem budget process shifts focus to the practical deployment of its ADA treasury, aiming to align spending with long-term goals and measurable outcomes. The proposed framework introduces standardized proposal templates, minimum funding thresholds, and a critical validation role for Delegated Representatives (DReps) to ensure accountability. This move is a key test of whether Cardano's decentralized governance can translate theory into effective execution, funding initiatives that spur genuine network growth. For ADA holders, the credibility and productivity of treasury allocation are crucial for long-term value, distinguishing the network's substance from mere speculation. The challenge lies in balancing structured process with agility to avoid bureaucratic bottlenecks and ensure funds drive tangible results rather than political debate.

bitcoinist32 min fa

Cardano Budget Process Puts ADA Treasury Spending Back In Focus

bitcoinist32 min fa

15 Reasoning Models Flip Collectively: Unpacking the Latent Risks Hidden in the Chain of Thought Behind Their Outputs

"15 Reasoning Models Collectively Fail: Revealing Hidden Risks in Chain-of-Thought Outputs" A systematic study led by researchers from Harvard, USC, Brown, and MIT warns that evaluating only the final output of large reasoning models (LRMs) is insufficient for safety. The research highlights that the intermediate reasoning chains (CoT) these models expose can contain dangerous content—like bomb-making instructions or poisoning recipes—even when the final answer appears safe. The core methodology involves separately assessing the reasoning chain and the final answer against 20 safety principles, each scored 1-5 for risk. This identifies three key failure modes: 'Unsafe' (both stages unsafe), 'Leak' (unsafe reasoning but safe answer), and 'Escape' (safe reasoning but unsafe answer). The team evaluated 15 reasoning models on a combined in-distribution dataset of 41K prompts from seven public harmful/jailbreak datasets. A universal finding across all 15 models was that reasoning chains are consistently riskier than final answers. Risk is concentrated in categories like misinformation, illegal activity, bias, and physical/psychological harm, with illegal compliance showing the starkest divergence. Case studies reveal instances where harmful operational details are 'leaked' in reasoning or a seemingly harmless chain 'escapes' into a dangerous final answer. To mitigate this, the researchers propose 'Adaptive Multi-Principle Steering,' a white-box, test-time intervention method. It identifies unsafe principles being activated during reasoning and gently steers the model's internal representations towards safer directions. Validated on open-source models, this approach reduced unsafe outputs by up to 40.8% while preserving 97.7% of benchmark performance. The work underscores the critical need to monitor and secure the entire reasoning process, not just the final output.

marsbit33 min fa

15 Reasoning Models Flip Collectively: Unpacking the Latent Risks Hidden in the Chain of Thought Behind Their Outputs

marsbit33 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片