В ФНС России рассказали о нюансах налогообложения майнеров

investing.ruPubblicato 2024-10-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-10-15

Happycoin.club - Во время выступления на форуме Mining.ru представитель ФНС РФ рассказал, какие принципы налогообложения майнеров станут использовать налоговые органы. По его словам, российские майнеры будут уплачивать налог на прибыль, причем в два этапа.

Первый этап (оплата аванса по добытой криптовалюте) наступит после того, как криптовалюты зачислятся на адрес-идентификатор, и налоговая база будет рассчитываться с момента начала распоряжения цифровыми активам, отметил чиновник.

Второй этап оплаты налога на прибыль наступит с момента, когда криптовалюты выбыли с адреса-идентификатора, или в том случае, если актив решено продать. Майнеров не станут облагать НДС, поскольку внутри страны криптовалюты не нужны, подчеркнул Катяев.

Помимо этого, он рассказал о том, какие сведения ФНС будет собирать в реестры – операторов майнинговой инфраструктуры, самих майнеров и добытой криптовалюты. Вся публичная информация, касающаяся реестров будет представлена на сайте Федеральной налоговой службы.

В реестр операторов майнинговой инфраструктуры войдет название компании, местонахождение ее дата-центра, где она берет электрическую энергию, и список ее клиентов.

В реестр майнеров включат информацию о том, кто является майнером, на каком оборудование планируется заниматься добычей криптовалют, какое количество виртуальных монет добывается и каков объём используемого электричества.

Третий реестр, где будет информация о полученных криптовалютах и список адресов-идентификаторов, сделают закрытым для налоговых органов и прочих ведомств для соблюдения безопасности.

Читайте оригинальную статью на сайте Happycoin.club

Letture associate

IOSG: Q-Day Countdown, Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrency?

IOSG: The Q-Day Countdown – Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrency? This analysis explores the looming threat quantum computing poses to blockchain technology. Quantum computers, leveraging Shor's algorithm, could theoretically break the elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) underpinning cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. The article outlines a hypothetical "Q-Day" scenario where exposed public keys from dormant assets are compromised, leading to fund theft and a deep governance crisis. The core risk is not the complete erasure of blockchains but a systemic reset of public-key cryptography. Bitcoin faces significant challenges due to its "code-is-law" ethos and the immense social consensus required for migration. Its primary vulnerability lies in legacy UTXOs with publicly exposed keys. Ethereum's path involves a more complex, full-stack cryptographic agility upgrade across execution, consensus, and data layers. The industry has a limited "engineering comfort window" of 5-8 years to coordinate a migration to post-quantum cryptography (PQC), such as lattice-based or hash-based signatures. While the existential threat is often overstated, the real bottleneck is the immense coordination required across protocol developers, node operators, wallet providers, exchanges, and custodians. Market repricing of crypto assets may occur well before an actual Q-Day if quantum hardware roadmaps accelerate or regulatory pressure mounts. The article concludes that quantum computing is not a doomsday weapon but a severe stress test for blockchain's foundational security model and governance structures.

marsbit16 min fa

IOSG: Q-Day Countdown, Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrency?

marsbit16 min fa

Why 2026 could redefine Ethereum, Solana, Base and Avalanche

Blockchain infrastructure is undergoing a major coordinated transformation, driven by institutional demand for reliability, compliance, and predictable settlement. Over $30 billion in Real-World Assets (RWA) on-chain has exposed network weaknesses. Major blockchains are responding with foundational upgrades, moving beyond incremental speed improvements. Ethereum's "Glamsterdam" upgrade, planned for H1 2026, will significantly increase gas limits and introduce features like PBS (pre-blocked state) for enhanced settlement and parallel execution. Solana's "Alpenglow," targeting a mainnet launch in H2 2026, focuses on reducing finality time dramatically and freeing network resources to improve reliability. Beyond speed, compliance is critical. Base's "Beryl" upgrade in Q3 2026 will introduce a standardized, regulatory-compliant token framework (B20). Avalanche's "Octane" upgrade aims to boost transaction processing and reduce costs for enterprise applications. Even Bitcoin is evolving with the potential activation of OP_CAT by late 2026/early 2027. The competition is shifting. While technical upgrades are widespread, institutions will ultimately allocate capital based on proven execution, operational resilience, and regulatory compatibility during market stress. Ethereum currently leads in tokenized assets, while networks like Base and Solana are strengthening their institutional offerings. The blockchain that best delivers reliable, compliant, and uninterrupted service is poised to attract the greatest share of future institutional capital.

ambcrypto54 min fa

Why 2026 could redefine Ethereum, Solana, Base and Avalanche

ambcrypto54 min fa

Tiger Research: Take RWA Tokenization Overseas First

This article discusses the strategic choices facing financial institutions in jurisdictions lacking mature regulatory frameworks for Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization. With the market growing rapidly, institutions must choose between waiting for local legislation, using regulatory sandboxes, or—the recommended priority—expanding into overseas markets to gain early experience. Successfully launching cross-border RWA tokenization requires meticulous preparation across six key areas: establishing an overseas base (e.g., Hong Kong, Singapore, the U.S.), securing necessary licenses, defining the tokenized asset (with bonds being simpler than non-standard assets), defining the target investor scope, deciding on settlement currencies/payment flows, and designing operational requirements like custody and on-chain governance. The article outlines two primary strategic paths: a direct "onshore" path and a "native on-chain" path. The direct path involves setting up a legal entity and obtaining licenses in a mature jurisdiction like Hong Kong, Singapore, or the U.S., leveraging existing platforms (e.g., DigiFT, Securitize) for efficiency. The alternative native on-chain path involves partnering with compliant, decentralized platforms (e.g., Ondo, Plume Nest) that use structures like offshore SPVs to facilitate tokenization and access DeFi liquidity, offering speed and broader reach but with greater structural complexity. The core argument is that institutions should not wait for perfect domestic regulation. A detailed hypothetical case study illustrates the multi-step, 6-12 month process of launching an overseas tokenized bond. The key takeaway is that the essence of a tokenization business lies not in the technology but in successfully executing the entire sales and operational process. The market is moving forward, and the time to act is now.

marsbit1 h fa

Tiger Research: Take RWA Tokenization Overseas First

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片