一文读懂NovaBank:基于算法非稳定币NVB的DeFi 3.0链上银行协议

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-10-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-10-08

Introduzione

为用户提供更加自由、透明的去中心化金融服务。

随着去中心化金融(DeFi)的飞速发展,越来越多的创新项目推动了这一领域的持续变革。NovaBank 正是在这一背景下应运而生,它基于 Olympus DAO 的算法非稳定币 OHM 的成功模型,并在此基础上进行了迭代创新。NovaBank 通过其双币生态和多元化的Web3生态融合,以及裂变激励机制构建了一个全新的链上银行协议,旨在为用户提供更加自由、透明的去中心化金融服务。

一文读懂NovaBank:基于算法非稳定币NVB的DeFi 3.0链上银行协议

一、NovaBank 简介

NovaBank 是一款基于 DeFi 3.0 架构的链上银行协议,其核心是算法非稳定币 NVB。NovaBank 借鉴了 Olympus DAO 的底层经济模型——OHM,这是一个久经验证且成功的商业模型,确保了协议的长期稳定性。通过智能合约的自动执行,NovaBank 实现了代币发行、市场调节和收益分配的全链上透明运作。

NovaBank 不仅继承了 OHM 的稳健机制,还通过收益模型、双币生态玩法(NVB + AVC)、以及Web3领域的多元化融合,极大地提升了社区的裂变速度,实现了私域和公域的生态整合,且让整体协议运行更加稳定。

二、NVB——基于算法的非稳定币

NVB 是 NovaBank 的核心代币,通过算法机制调节其供应和价格,确保代币市场的稳定性。NVB 的发行依据市场供需,通过无风险价值(RFV) 1 USDT 作为支撑铸造,这确保了代币能够在无外部支持的情况下维持稳定并具备长期增长潜力。

借鉴 Olympus DAO 的 OHM 模式,NovaBank 通过其收益模型和贡献值系统进一步增强了代币的实用性和增长潜力。相比传统的稳定币模式,NVB 的算法模型允许更灵活的市场调节,有效防止了中心化金融体系中的过度操控。

三、NovaBank 的六大核心合约

 1. 国库合约:国库合约负责 NovaBank 的资产储备管理,确保协议资产的安全和稳定性。通过持续的资产积累,国库为 NVB 提供了铸币支撑,保障协议的长期可持续发展。

 2. 销售合约:销售合约通过市场供需平衡机制调节代币的发行,确保 NVB 的价格和流动性始终保持在健康水平。

 3. 债券合约:债券合约为用户提供折扣购买 NVB 的机会,用户通过持有债券为协议注入更多的流动性及 RFV,保证资金的稳定流动,同时享受低成本代币获取的机会。

 4. 质押合约:质押合约允许用户通过质押 NVB 来获得稳定的复利收益,用户的质押收益自动滚存,增加了资产增值的稳定性,还帮助平台维持市场的流动性。

 5. 收益行权期合约:此合约确保用户的收益按照既定周期逐步释放,避免短期波动影响长期收益,为用户提供更高的资金安全性和收益稳定性,同时用户可以通过销毁生态代币 AVC 加速收益释放,从而获得更高的灵活性。

 6. 贡献值算法合约:NovaBank 通过贡献值算法对用户的贡献进行奖励,贡献越大,奖励越多。这一机制鼓励用户积极参与平台建设,并提升协议的整体活跃度。

四、NovaBank 的创新亮点

1. 双币生态玩法:除了 NVB 作为核心代币,NovaBank 还引入了生态代币 AVC(Alterverse 由币安领投)。AVC 不仅为 NovaBank 的经济循环提供动力,还加速了社区的裂变和用户参与。用户参与 NVB 单币质押获取极高的 APY 收益,引入 AVC 销毁来加速收益释放,同时生态销毁收益部分定期由 DAO 投票回购销毁 NVB,真正做到私域和公域的双向赋能,这极大提高了用户的参与感和社区粘性。

2.  去中心化治理:NovaBank 完全依赖社区治理,用户可以通过持有 NVB 参与协议的决策与投票。这种去中心化的管理模式确保了协议的透明性和公平性,避免了中心化机构对金融体系的操控。

 3. 多元化Web3生态融合:NovaBank 不仅仅是一个 DeFi 协议,它还致力于融合 NFT、DAO 治理、GameFi、支付、RWA 等Web3领域的多元化应用场景,增强了平台的用户活跃度和社区互动,随着国库增值计划发展未来还提供了多种金融服务,如借贷、理财、收益分配等,为用户的资产管理与增值提供了更多选择。

 4. 持续创新的收益模型:NovaBank 的收益模型通过行权期逐步释放用户的质押收益,用户可通过销毁 AVC 来加速收益释放。这种灵活且可控的收益模式,使用户在获取长期稳定收益的同时,享有更多的自主权。

 5. 社区裂变与私域+公域结合:通过生态双币模式,NovaBank 成功实现了私域社区和公域生态的结合。用户不仅能通过质押获得收益,还能通过参与裂变激励政策获得更多代币奖励,从而推动社区的扩展和生态的自我增值。

一文读懂NovaBank:基于算法非稳定币NVB的DeFi 3.0链上银行协议

五、NovaBank 的经济模型

NovaBank 的底层经济逻辑借鉴了 Olympus DAO 的 OHM 模型,其代币 NVB 通过算法机制调节供应,并通过无风险价值(RFV) 1 USDT 为支撑。这种机制确保了代币的长期稳定增长,并具备高度的市场适应性。

此外,NovaBank 的经济飞轮模型包括静态收益与动态收益两个部分。用户可以通过质押 NVB 获得静态复利收益,同时通过贡献值奖励系统和债券激励等机制获取动态收益。每 8 小时一个区块时间的 0.4% (初始平衡点)爆块收益,确保了质押用户的长期利益。

六、NovaBank 如何解决传统金融问题?

 1. 打破中心化壁垒:NovaBank 的去中心化协议使得用户不再依赖中心化的金融机构,用户可以直接掌控自己的资产和收益,消除了对传统银行和金融中介的依赖。

 2. 透明与可审计:NovaBank 的所有操作都通过智能合约在链上完成,公开透明,用户可以随时查询和审计协议的运作,确保资金的安全性。

 3. 降低金融参与门槛:通过算法机制,NovaBank 能够动态调节市场流动性,用户可以轻松参与到 DeFi 生态中,无需高昂的金融知识和复杂操作

七、NovaBank 的未来展望

NovaBank 基于 Olympus DAO 的底层算法机制结合了创新的多元生态经济模型,成功打造了一个去中心化的链上银行协议。NVB 作为核心代币,AVC 作为 NovaBank 1.0 生态推动力,为用户提供了长期稳定的收益和多样化的参与方式。

NovaBank 不仅是一个创新的去中心化链上银行协议,还是一个完整的加密金融生态。通过算法调节、去中心化治理和多元生态模式,NovaBank 实现了社区与用户的高效结合,极大推动了去中心化金融的发展。

Letture associate

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

Title: Who Makes Money from Agents? The rise of AI Agents as potential blockchain users raises a crucial question: if they become the next billion users, who will capture the value? Traditional crypto value capture theories—like "fat protocols" (where value accrues to the base layer) and "fat applications" (where value accrues to user-facing apps)—assume human users who value UX, brand, and convenience. Agents, however, operate differently: they interact via APIs, have no brand loyalty, and can switch services with near-zero cost. This shift could disrupt existing value flows. Applications might become "headless," offering their routing and infrastructure as APIs to Agents. Alternatively, Agents might bypass intermediaries entirely, allowing protocols to regain value capture ("fat protocols" reborn). A more extreme scenario is that Agents, being purely rational and cost-sensitive, could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward marginal cost and turning crypto into a low-margin utility. However, Agents may not just amplify existing activities; they could enable entirely new ones—like continuous, sub-penny portfolio rebalancing, machine-to-machine commerce, and new market types only viable at automated speeds. This expands the economic pie rather than just redistributing it. Ultimately, the key question for builders is: what will make an Agent return to your service instead of a cheaper alternative? The answer may not be UX but factors like liquidity, latency, settlement guarantees, or a yet-unnamed business model. As humans and Agents will coexist as users, value capture may split: "fat apps" for human-facing services, and a new, evolving model for the Agent-dominated layer.

marsbit22 min fa

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

marsbit22 min fa

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

Base has officially launched Base MCP, allowing users to connect their Base Account to AI Agents to perform actions like swaps, transfers, portfolio tracking, and transaction history queries through conversational commands. This move aligns with Base's strategic focus on AI, driven by the broader competition in the emerging Agent-to-Agent payment sector. The evolution of Agent payments has accelerated. In late 2024, the primary method involved insecure browser automation. By 2025, solutions like Coinbase's x402 (providing crypto wallets for Agents), Google's AP2, and Visa's token-based system emerged. x402 has since processed 176 million transactions totaling over $70 million, with a median value between $0.01 and $0.10. Stablecoins, particularly USDC, dominate these settlements due to their negligible transaction costs compared to traditional payment fees, which are prohibitive for micro-payments. Coinbase faces competition from Stripe, which has built a comparable infrastructure for Agent payments with its Tempo blockchain, Privy wallets, Bridge routing (acquired for $1.1B), and the recently launched MPP protocol. Both companies are now competing at the application layer. The core reason AI is central to Base's strategy is to expand the scenarios for Agent payments, ensuring more transactions occur on its network. By securing a dominant position and scale advantage in this nascent field, Coinbase aims to capture the future commercial potential of Agent-driven payments. The launch of Base MCP is thus a strategic step in this larger ambition.

marsbit27 min fa

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

marsbit27 min fa

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

"Rethinking Ethereum's Value: The 'Vault Logic' Framework" Traditional valuation models incorrectly treat Ethereum as a company, valuing ETH based on transaction fees ("revenue"). This is flawed. Fees are network friction; a successful network aims to reduce them to zero. Ethereum's average fee has dropped from over $50 in 2021 to around $0.20 today, while transaction volume has tripled. Instead, view Ethereum as a digital vault securing ~$250 billion in on-chain assets (stablecoins, RWAs, L2 bridged funds, wBTC, etc.). Post-merge, Ethereum's security is directly purchased with its own asset: ETH. To attack the network, an attacker must acquire and control staked ETH. Therefore, the vault's security level is intrinsically tied to ETH's market value. Currently, the value of all staked ETH is only ~$72B, protecting ~$250B in assets—a dangerous imbalance. For robust security, the staked ETH securing the network should be valued significantly *higher* than the total value it protects. Applying a conservative security multiplier suggests ETH's fair value should be closer to ~$6,900 (vs. ~$2,070 currently). As on-chain asset value grows into the trillions, ETH's price must rise proportionally to maintain this security budget. Comparisons to free infrastructure like Linux or low-margin utilities like the DTCC are misguided. Their security is provided externally (community, law, banks). Ethereum's security is internal and must be purchased in the open market using ETH. ETH is not the clearinghouse; it is the collateral backing it. The model is not a short-term price predictor but a structural framework. The economic force for ETH appreciation grows monotonically with the adoption of Ethereum for settling value. The narrative that high fees are good is backwards; low fees enable more activity, which increases the value needing protection, thus demanding a more valuable ETH.

marsbit34 min fa

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

marsbit34 min fa

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

In an interview with *Hurun Report*, Justin Sun, founder of TRON, discussed the evolution of the Web3 industry as it moves from initial exploration to large-scale adoption. He emphasized that the core value of blockchain lies in building an open and inclusive internet of value, enabling anyone globally to transfer and use funds efficiently and at low cost, regardless of location or access to banking. Sun highlighted that projects with lasting impact are those built on genuine demand and real-world usage. He pointed to the stablecoin payment ecosystem as the most mature and scalable application currently, noting that TRON has rapidly become one of the world's largest stablecoin networks. The circulation of USDT on TRON has surpassed $86.3 billion, driven by actual use cases such as cross-border transfers and daily payments, demonstrating strong network effects. Regarding strategy, Sun outlined a methodology combining data-driven iteration, rapid execution, and user-centric focus. He cited the decision to partner with Tether to launch TRC-20 USDT as a key strategic move, based on an assessment of market trends and long-term potential, which has become a significant growth engine for the TRON ecosystem. On globalization, Sun stressed the importance of local compliance and cultural adaptation, noting that success in different markets depends on deep understanding and local partnerships. He also addressed the convergence of AI and blockchain, describing it as a transformative direction where blockchain provides decentralized infrastructure for AI, while AI enhances the intelligence and user experience of blockchain systems. For industry participants and young entrepreneurs, Sun advised continuous learning and adaptability in a fast-changing environment, focusing on building irreplaceable core strengths rather than spreading resources too thinly. Through infrastructure development, global strategy, and technological foresight, TRON aims to advance the practical implementation and evolution of the value internet.

marsbit1 h fa

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

marsbit1 h fa

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the Idaho-based memory chip maker, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion, securing its position as one of the top three DRAM manufacturers alongside Samsung and SK Hynix. Its survival and growth story is marked by a unique combination of political maneuvering and hard-won manufacturing efficiency, but also strategic missteps that now challenge its future. Founded in 1978 in Boise without significant government or capital backing, Micron repeatedly turned to Washington for survival during critical junctures. In the 1980s, it filed anti-dumping complaints against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which Micron had earlier licensed its 64K DRAM technology to. In 2002, Micron avoided heavy fines in a price-fixing investigation by acting as a whistleblower against its competitors, cementing its reputation as a "political opportunist." A major strategic error occurred in 2013 with its $2.5 billion acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. This deal burdened Micron with integrating incompatible manufacturing processes just as the industry was pivoting toward HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), a critical technology for AI. SK Hynix had launched its first HBM chip that same year. By the time AI demand exploded with ChatGPT in 2022, SK Hynix commanded about 85% of the HBM3 market, while Micron, playing catch-up, held only around 3%. In 2017, Micron employed similar tactics against a new competitor, Chinese startup Fujian Jinhua, by alleging intellectual property theft, which led to U.S. sanctions effectively crippling the firm. However, this strategy backfired in 2023 when China banned Micron's products from its critical infrastructure, causing its revenue share from China to plummet from 14% in FY2023 to just 7.1% by FY2025. Today, Micron faces a triple squeeze: it lags in the high-margin HBM race, faces pricing pressure in low-end DRAM from Chinese manufacturers like CXMT, and has lost crucial access to the booming Chinese AI server market. Despite its political strategies, Micron's core strength is its exceptional manufacturing cost control, achieved through decades of engineering. Its DRAM chips have a smaller cell area than its rivals, yielding more chips per wafer. This efficiency has been vital for weathering industry downturns. However, this advantage cannot compensate for the decade lost in HBM development. Micron is now racing to ramp up production of its HBM3E, certified by NVIDIA, and develop HBM4. Its future hinges on whether it can close this technological "time debt" through relentless R&D and execution, in a marathon where its competitors, having started earlier, are not slowing down.

marsbit1 h fa

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片