10月加密市场前瞻:链抽象、Layer1竞争与稳定币赛道

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-10-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-10-08

Introduzione

几个并行的主线叙事

原文作者:雨中狂睡,加密 KOL

10月加密市场前瞻:链抽象、Layer1竞争与稳定币赛道

就像前情提要说的那样,这次的十月展望会非常简洁,只会详细聊我个人想要参与的 3-5 个代币,希望这种形式大家会喜欢(以前太散了,信息效率不高)。

TLDR: $UNI $SOL Berachain $TAO $WELL $ENA

市场的炒作一般分为两种模式,一种是人造叙事,这种叙事一般会推一个龙头代币走独立行情,比如 $SUI。另一种是创新的酝酿、出现和爆发。这种创新可能是一个好玩的 Ponzi,也可能是在很大程度上满足了市场需求的叙事,比如 $AXS(这一轮的 memecoin 算一个非典型案例)。

一般而言,第一种叙事浪潮会给到我们普通人更多的机会。这种大的创新往往诞生于宏观流动性外溢的情景下——资金对赚钱效应&资本效率有了更高的需求,需求推动创新的发生。

这一轮有一个很大的问题就是「没有出现像上一轮那样能够引导流动性进入和转移的叙事」,而流动性是资产定价的关键。叙事无法引导流动性,资产炒作也就很难起来。大家都在炒 meme,注意力也在 meme 上,只要有一些风吹草动,相关的 meme 就会迅速出现。但 meme 叙事也最容易让投资者感到疲倦,最终一地鸡毛。

那么币圈还有机会吗?

我觉得是有的,至少币圈还是有几个主线叙事正在并行发展的。

意图抽象&链抽象

这个叙事最终想要达成的目的就是「让用户和流动性以一种低门槛和无感的方式进入和参与 Crypto」,看起来前景是一片光明。但这个不是 Ponzi,大概率不会出现批量的财富机会。

本质上这些炒作还是基于「币圈用户觉得这个叙事能够为他们带来新的接盘侠」这个思路进行的。但它最终能否为币圈带来大量的真实用户和流动性,这里我们还是得打个问号。

而这个叙事的核心催化剂在于 $UNI v4 的推出。

Uniswap v4 的推出相当于是一个将市场注意力引向这个叙事的催化剂。未来在这个叙事发展的过程中,前端可能会成为最受市场青睐的炒作标的,而类似 Uniswap v4 这样的「基础设施层标的」,以及「流动性交互层标的」次之。但在最开始,机会最大的应该还是 $UNI。同时,类似概念的 $COW $1INCH 应该也会有对应的机会。

Layer 1 竞争

在当前市场中,Layer 1 竞争是最为主流的叙事,没有之一。

在这个周期中,市场炒作的主线是 Solana,并且还会时不时会蹦出一条其他 Layer 1 来与 Solana 竞争一下。

比如之前的 $AVAX,Avalanche 是通过「炒 meme」和「官宣与顶级公司的 PR」来推动代币价格增长的。现在的 $SUI 也是一个道理,他们是通过「OTC 交易来让英文 CT 们喊单(存疑,不确定)硬造一个新叙事」、「memecoin 炒作(现在 Sui 上也有一些不错的财富效应)」以及「用 $SUI 代币来激励流动性(类似于 Arbitrum)」来吸引市场注意力和提升流动性粘性的。值得一提的是,Sui 上的 DeFi 收益率还是不错的。

现在很多 Layer 1 都开始尝试利用 memecoin 来吸引市场的注意力和流动性,不过最终收效甚微(比如 BSC)。

因此,我觉得 Layer 1 的你方唱罢我登场大概率是短期事件。这些 Layer 1 搞事情,短期参与肯定可以获利——因为你的行为匹配了项目方的需求。

另外一种 Layer 1 玩法是 Fantom 的 Rebrand——搞一个性能更好的链进行品牌升级。区块链如果一开始没人玩,那就用未来空投的预期做激励。本质上,它与之前 Layer 2 的玩法类似,新意不高,但是在空投前是有效的。

要说看好的 Layer 1 ,我这里的名单是:Solana $SOL 和 Berachain。

看好 Solana 的原因很简单,只要看看在 Binance 上谁家的大市值 memecoin 数量更多就可以了。memecoin 就是一条 Layer 1 的王牌。

而 Berachain 的 PoL 是这个周期 Layer 1 共识机制中唯一的大型创新,引入了用户、节点和项目方的动态博弈。同时他们也在积极地用透明、去中心化和公平的方式扶持生态项目。我深度参与了 Berachain 的生态,所以奶一奶,DYOR。

除了基础的 Layer 1 竞争外,我也很喜欢模块化叙事,模块化是这轮周期被讨论比较多的新叙事。其实看下面这张图就好了。

不过模块化标的又有些一言难尽。本来我是想奶 $EIGEN 一口,却没想到 $EIGEN 出了黑客事件,引起了社区极大的反响。总而言之,我还是看好 $EIGEN,并且认为 $EIGEN 有可能吸血其他模块化项目,在 Q4 的某个时期有一波价格上的表现(真正要大规模炒起来,估计要下一个周期了)。

10月加密市场前瞻:链抽象、Layer1竞争与稳定币赛道

AI

AI 叙事无需多提,看 OpenAI 最近的操作即可。以及,之前 AI 代币还会跟英伟达股票。最近 Crypto AI 赛道中表现最好的代币就是 $TAO,要选标的就选最强的。AI 代币的炒作与基本面无关,我们重点还是要关注 AI 行业的变迁。(中国 TAO $NMT 也可以关注一下,不过它的炒作是 $TAO 后面的事情了)关键词是「在大盘回调期间的价格表现」与「合适的时间节点」。

这类炒作会延续到 AI 泡沫破裂前。在破裂前,我们能做的只有享受泡沫。

稳定币竞争和 DeFi

当前稳定币赛道的竞争愈发激烈,比如 Paypal 的入局,Binance 转头去扶持 FDUSD,贝莱德也在积极布局稳定币赛道,Coinbase 在 Base 上 USDC 和欧元稳定币。

在这种激烈竞争下,目前能供我们炒作的主要是 Sky(原 MakerDAO)、 $LQTY 和 $ENA 这三个代币。

Sky 是最古老的去中心化稳定币项目,最近正在推进其治理代币和原生稳定币的转型。很明显,Sky 希望降低降息对于项目产品的影响,从「使用 RWA 收益激励采用」转型到「使用代币激励采用」的模式。后面,Sky 会通过发 SubDAO 的形式来开新盘子,以维持项目稳定币的采用规模。财富机会肯定会有,不过现在社区并不买单 Sky 最近的操作。我也看到了社区的一些负面言论。

另外,就像神鱼老师所说的,降息肯定会提升 DeFi 的竞争力。DeFi 赛道,包括以太坊和 Solana 的 DeFi 都有机会。简而言之就是哪个 Layer 1 链上活动高,TVL 高,哪个链上的 DeFi 项目代币就越受青睐。后面,对高收益的需求可能也会催生出新的盘子。不过那是大牛市的事情了,我们走一步看一步呗。

这里我想单独提一下以太坊 Layer 2 Basechain。Base 最近表现很好,TVL 在 9 月涨了很多,基本面的增长会带来新的财富机会。这里我们需要明确 Coinbase 做 Basechain 的需求:Base 能够拓展 Coinbase 在加密行业的影响力,还能够为 Coinbasse 带来排序器收入。Base 好,Coinbase 就会受益,那么 Coinbase 就完全有动力去推动 Base 生态的持续增长(之前拉盘 $AERO 也是这个道理)。

10月加密市场前瞻:链抽象、Layer1竞争与稳定币赛道

目前 Coinbase 在推的是什么?

cbBTC。

Moonwell 和 Aerodrome 将会是 cbBTC 增长的主要场所。目前,Moonwell 已经推出 cbBTC 流动性挖矿补贴。拉盘 $WELL 就能够推动更多的 cbBTC 采用(个人观点)。

10月加密市场前瞻:链抽象、Layer1竞争与稳定币赛道

$LQTY 有 v2 的预期(11 月),也是社区认可的去中心化稳定币。Sky 的转型本身对 $LQTY 来说就是利好,这也是它在前段时间涨势凶猛的原因之一(我个人的观点)。行业变迁的影响和预期的即将兑现可能会影响到 $LQTY 未来的价格表现。

而 $ENA 的竞争力在于:「这个周期出来的新型稳定币」和「与贝莱德合作推出新的 UStb 稳定币」。这个合作形式的影响力要比那些参与贝莱德 Buidl 基金的项目大很多,深度合作是最好的催化剂。$ENA 最近的空投和解锁应该会给到我们入场的机会。

10月加密市场前瞻:链抽象、Layer1竞争与稳定币赛道

其他看好的代币分别是 $PENDLE 和 $BANANA。$PENDLE 之前聊过多次了,最近在推 BTCFi,还有 v3 预期。$BANANA 可以参考 @BensonTWN 老板的这篇(写得很好):https://x.com/BensonTWN/status/1839664439093813397

游戏的话,会考虑 $PIXEL $PRIME $PIRATE,我个人认为我们不能以游戏板块的视角来看这几个项目,需要单独看这些项目对应的催化剂。

BTC 生态还需要再观察(核心需求还是在的,详情可以看我 metagame 那篇)。目前我们仍处于市场认为矿工需要链上活跃度以增加收入的阶段,期待 BTC 生态能有新盘子跑出来。但问题是,链上手续费激增大概率只会是短期现象,矿工喜欢归喜欢,但是市场不可能持续买单。

关于 memecoin 叙事,我个人认为主流 memecoin 会在流动性回归之后出现一波巨大的涨幅,$WIF $PEPE 机会最大。memecoin 无法预测,只能顺应潮流。总体来说,我还是看好 memecoin 这个赛道,且认为这个赛道会出现至少两个 10 B+ 市值的 memecoin,就像上轮的 $DOGE $SHIB。

最后,我们来扫一下十月会发生什么事情:

  • $JEWEL Colosseum PvP on Metis:不知道这俩项目能够擦出怎样的火花,不过 $METIS 确实走得不错;

  • $XRP ETF 和 SEC:我觉得有机会来个不错的反弹;

  • $STX Nakamoto Upgrade:对 $STX 是利好,大概率 Stacks 上也会出现不错的财富机会;

  • $DUSK Mainnet Launch:目前不会太关注这个赛道;

  • $AVAX Summit ( 16-18 Oct)$WLD "New World" with Sam Altman:也与 AI 行业相关;

  • $RENDER Migration Rewards End$TIA Unlock of $ 1.05 BJPY Interest Rate Decision

详情参考这篇:https://x.com/breadnbutter247/status/1840435197893857689

原文链接

Letture associate

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

Title: Who Makes Money from Agents? The rise of AI Agents as potential blockchain users raises a crucial question: if they become the next billion users, who will capture the value? Traditional crypto value capture theories—like "fat protocols" (where value accrues to the base layer) and "fat applications" (where value accrues to user-facing apps)—assume human users who value UX, brand, and convenience. Agents, however, operate differently: they interact via APIs, have no brand loyalty, and can switch services with near-zero cost. This shift could disrupt existing value flows. Applications might become "headless," offering their routing and infrastructure as APIs to Agents. Alternatively, Agents might bypass intermediaries entirely, allowing protocols to regain value capture ("fat protocols" reborn). A more extreme scenario is that Agents, being purely rational and cost-sensitive, could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward marginal cost and turning crypto into a low-margin utility. However, Agents may not just amplify existing activities; they could enable entirely new ones—like continuous, sub-penny portfolio rebalancing, machine-to-machine commerce, and new market types only viable at automated speeds. This expands the economic pie rather than just redistributing it. Ultimately, the key question for builders is: what will make an Agent return to your service instead of a cheaper alternative? The answer may not be UX but factors like liquidity, latency, settlement guarantees, or a yet-unnamed business model. As humans and Agents will coexist as users, value capture may split: "fat apps" for human-facing services, and a new, evolving model for the Agent-dominated layer.

marsbit21 min fa

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

marsbit21 min fa

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

Base has officially launched Base MCP, allowing users to connect their Base Account to AI Agents to perform actions like swaps, transfers, portfolio tracking, and transaction history queries through conversational commands. This move aligns with Base's strategic focus on AI, driven by the broader competition in the emerging Agent-to-Agent payment sector. The evolution of Agent payments has accelerated. In late 2024, the primary method involved insecure browser automation. By 2025, solutions like Coinbase's x402 (providing crypto wallets for Agents), Google's AP2, and Visa's token-based system emerged. x402 has since processed 176 million transactions totaling over $70 million, with a median value between $0.01 and $0.10. Stablecoins, particularly USDC, dominate these settlements due to their negligible transaction costs compared to traditional payment fees, which are prohibitive for micro-payments. Coinbase faces competition from Stripe, which has built a comparable infrastructure for Agent payments with its Tempo blockchain, Privy wallets, Bridge routing (acquired for $1.1B), and the recently launched MPP protocol. Both companies are now competing at the application layer. The core reason AI is central to Base's strategy is to expand the scenarios for Agent payments, ensuring more transactions occur on its network. By securing a dominant position and scale advantage in this nascent field, Coinbase aims to capture the future commercial potential of Agent-driven payments. The launch of Base MCP is thus a strategic step in this larger ambition.

marsbit27 min fa

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

marsbit27 min fa

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

"Rethinking Ethereum's Value: The 'Vault Logic' Framework" Traditional valuation models incorrectly treat Ethereum as a company, valuing ETH based on transaction fees ("revenue"). This is flawed. Fees are network friction; a successful network aims to reduce them to zero. Ethereum's average fee has dropped from over $50 in 2021 to around $0.20 today, while transaction volume has tripled. Instead, view Ethereum as a digital vault securing ~$250 billion in on-chain assets (stablecoins, RWAs, L2 bridged funds, wBTC, etc.). Post-merge, Ethereum's security is directly purchased with its own asset: ETH. To attack the network, an attacker must acquire and control staked ETH. Therefore, the vault's security level is intrinsically tied to ETH's market value. Currently, the value of all staked ETH is only ~$72B, protecting ~$250B in assets—a dangerous imbalance. For robust security, the staked ETH securing the network should be valued significantly *higher* than the total value it protects. Applying a conservative security multiplier suggests ETH's fair value should be closer to ~$6,900 (vs. ~$2,070 currently). As on-chain asset value grows into the trillions, ETH's price must rise proportionally to maintain this security budget. Comparisons to free infrastructure like Linux or low-margin utilities like the DTCC are misguided. Their security is provided externally (community, law, banks). Ethereum's security is internal and must be purchased in the open market using ETH. ETH is not the clearinghouse; it is the collateral backing it. The model is not a short-term price predictor but a structural framework. The economic force for ETH appreciation grows monotonically with the adoption of Ethereum for settling value. The narrative that high fees are good is backwards; low fees enable more activity, which increases the value needing protection, thus demanding a more valuable ETH.

marsbit33 min fa

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

marsbit33 min fa

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

In an interview with *Hurun Report*, Justin Sun, founder of TRON, discussed the evolution of the Web3 industry as it moves from initial exploration to large-scale adoption. He emphasized that the core value of blockchain lies in building an open and inclusive internet of value, enabling anyone globally to transfer and use funds efficiently and at low cost, regardless of location or access to banking. Sun highlighted that projects with lasting impact are those built on genuine demand and real-world usage. He pointed to the stablecoin payment ecosystem as the most mature and scalable application currently, noting that TRON has rapidly become one of the world's largest stablecoin networks. The circulation of USDT on TRON has surpassed $86.3 billion, driven by actual use cases such as cross-border transfers and daily payments, demonstrating strong network effects. Regarding strategy, Sun outlined a methodology combining data-driven iteration, rapid execution, and user-centric focus. He cited the decision to partner with Tether to launch TRC-20 USDT as a key strategic move, based on an assessment of market trends and long-term potential, which has become a significant growth engine for the TRON ecosystem. On globalization, Sun stressed the importance of local compliance and cultural adaptation, noting that success in different markets depends on deep understanding and local partnerships. He also addressed the convergence of AI and blockchain, describing it as a transformative direction where blockchain provides decentralized infrastructure for AI, while AI enhances the intelligence and user experience of blockchain systems. For industry participants and young entrepreneurs, Sun advised continuous learning and adaptability in a fast-changing environment, focusing on building irreplaceable core strengths rather than spreading resources too thinly. Through infrastructure development, global strategy, and technological foresight, TRON aims to advance the practical implementation and evolution of the value internet.

marsbit1 h fa

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

marsbit1 h fa

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the Idaho-based memory chip maker, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion, securing its position as one of the top three DRAM manufacturers alongside Samsung and SK Hynix. Its survival and growth story is marked by a unique combination of political maneuvering and hard-won manufacturing efficiency, but also strategic missteps that now challenge its future. Founded in 1978 in Boise without significant government or capital backing, Micron repeatedly turned to Washington for survival during critical junctures. In the 1980s, it filed anti-dumping complaints against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which Micron had earlier licensed its 64K DRAM technology to. In 2002, Micron avoided heavy fines in a price-fixing investigation by acting as a whistleblower against its competitors, cementing its reputation as a "political opportunist." A major strategic error occurred in 2013 with its $2.5 billion acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. This deal burdened Micron with integrating incompatible manufacturing processes just as the industry was pivoting toward HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), a critical technology for AI. SK Hynix had launched its first HBM chip that same year. By the time AI demand exploded with ChatGPT in 2022, SK Hynix commanded about 85% of the HBM3 market, while Micron, playing catch-up, held only around 3%. In 2017, Micron employed similar tactics against a new competitor, Chinese startup Fujian Jinhua, by alleging intellectual property theft, which led to U.S. sanctions effectively crippling the firm. However, this strategy backfired in 2023 when China banned Micron's products from its critical infrastructure, causing its revenue share from China to plummet from 14% in FY2023 to just 7.1% by FY2025. Today, Micron faces a triple squeeze: it lags in the high-margin HBM race, faces pricing pressure in low-end DRAM from Chinese manufacturers like CXMT, and has lost crucial access to the booming Chinese AI server market. Despite its political strategies, Micron's core strength is its exceptional manufacturing cost control, achieved through decades of engineering. Its DRAM chips have a smaller cell area than its rivals, yielding more chips per wafer. This efficiency has been vital for weathering industry downturns. However, this advantage cannot compensate for the decade lost in HBM development. Micron is now racing to ramp up production of its HBM3E, certified by NVIDIA, and develop HBM4. Its future hinges on whether it can close this technological "time debt" through relentless R&D and execution, in a marathon where its competitors, having started earlier, are not slowing down.

marsbit1 h fa

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片