$24 Million Crypto Heist: AT&T Back In Legal Hot Water Over SIM Swap Scandal

bitcoinistPubblicato 2024-10-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-10-04

Introduzione

AT&T is back in the news again for new legal challenges related to a sensational SIM swap case in which...

AT&T is back in the news again for new legal challenges related to a sensational SIM swap case in which crypto worth $24 million was stolen from an investor by the name of Michael Terpin.

Recently, a division of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a recent ruling by the lower court in favor of the telecom company and thereby allowed the case to continue in trial.

This ruling also brings back on track Terpin’s lawsuit against the telecom company, and consequently, underlines important issues involving the different roles of telcos in protecting customer information.

A Lengthy Legal Fight

It all began in 2018 when Terpin fell prey to the sophisticated SIM swap attack. Scammers bribed an AT&T employee to transfer Terpin’s number to a blank card in their phone. With access to his phone, they were able to reset passwords and bypass two-factor authentication, leading to the massive theft of his cryptocurrency holdings. Despite taking extensive precautions, including consulting with security experts, Terpin found himself helpless against the attack.

Terpin initially filed a $24 million-damage lawsuit against both AT&T and the alleged hacker, Ellis Pinsky. However, on 20th April 2023, a judge ruled in favor of AT&T, stating that they were entitled to a summary judgment that dismissed most of the claims of Terpin. This came as a shock to both Terpin and many observers as it was assumed that it was the duty of AT&T to protect the customer data.

The Appeals Court Decision

Fast forward to October 2024, the Ninth Circuit Court has reversed that ruling based on actual violations of the Federal Communications Act. The court concurs that AT&T maybe didn’t protect CPNI, or information about network use that customers reasonably expect would be kept private and safe. This is important because it means Terpin can bring damages claims against AT&T for interest and attorney fees, now more than $45 million.

As of today, the market cap of cryptocurrencies stood at $2.05 trillion. Chart: TradingView.com

According to Terpin, lead attorney pierce O’Donnell said he feels positive about the ruling. He noted that it sets a precedent for other litigants to sue telecom firms for negligence as well in case of unavailability to protect customers’ sensitive information. O’Donnell said that it doesn’t just relate to one individual but thousands of customers who have been affected due to weak security of AT&T.

Implications For Consumers

The impact of this case extends way beyond Terpin and AT&T, however. The higher that cryptocurrency usage continues to balloon, the bigger the threat of SIM swapping has become within the digital asset space. Many use SMS-based two-factor authentication methods to secure accounts, but these are easy pickings as well through means of SIM swaps. Experts note that reliance on text messages in security is bad practice.

Terpin pointed out that this would have let AT&T wriggle free of liability, setting a dangerous precedent in terms of consumer protection in telecommunications. “This isn’t about a victory for me,” he said. “It’s about ensuring companies take their responsibility seriously when it comes to protecting their customers’ data.”

Featured image from Certo Software, chart from TradingView

Christian Encila

Christian Encila

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Letture associate

To Those Ordinary People Who Haven't Invested in AI: You Think You're Late, You're Just Lacking Your Own Worldview

**Summary:** The article argues that ordinary investors feeling FOMO over missing the AI investment boom lack not timing, but their own independent worldview. Most people chase "what to buy" based on others' opinions (FOMO, envy) rather than fundamental analysis. This leads to costly mistakes: not knowing when to exit winning trades or cut losses on losing ones. The core solution is to develop a personal, long-term (5-10 year) worldview about societal shifts and technological bottlenecks. For most, building this from scratch (Path A) is too demanding. A practical alternative (Path B) is to follow the **capital expenditures (capex)** and strategic investments of visionary leaders, as their money reveals true conviction more reliably than their words. Five key figures to track for different AI perspectives are highlighted: Jensen Huang (NVIDIA, infrastructure), Elon Musk (Tesla/SpaceX/xAI, capex signals), Sam Altman (OpenAI, commercialization, but beware hype), Dario Amodei (Anthropic, technical/safety focus), and Liang Wenfeng (DeepSeek, efficiency/anti-consensus view). The article details how to read capex signals from hyperscalers' financial reports, NVIDIA's revenue breakdown, and strategic investments. It maps the complete AI产业链 (supply chain) from raw materials/energy to models/applications, explaining value flow and inter-dependencies (e.g., how a model release triggers demand across chips, memory, and optics). Finally, it provides an action plan: secure personal finances first, allocate a limited portfolio percentage (max 25%) to the theme, prefer broad ETFs (like QQQ), use dollar-cost averaging over 6-12 months, and write down strict investment rules beforehand to combat emotional errors during market volatility. The conclusion is that a stable, personally-held worldview enables disciplined, long-term investment far more than chasing short-term trends.

marsbit19 min fa

To Those Ordinary People Who Haven't Invested in AI: You Think You're Late, You're Just Lacking Your Own Worldview

marsbit19 min fa

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

Microsoft has halted the widespread internal use of Claude Code, withdrawing licenses from most employees by the end of its fiscal year, June 30, 2026. This reversal comes just six months after actively promoting the AI coding tool to boost productivity via "vibe coding"—where developers describe intent in natural language and let the LLM generate code. The core issue isn't the tool's effectiveness; internal reports suggest employees preferred Claude Code over Microsoft's own Copilot CLI. The problem is financial: the "copilot mode" adds a variable, consumption-based token cost on top of existing employee salaries without a proportional revenue increase. As usage grew, the token bills became unsustainable, leading to what sources describe as a cost-structure failure. Similar overruns have been reported at other firms like Uber. The article contrasts this with the approach of AI-native startups, exemplified by Y Combinator's philosophy. Here, high token consumption is strategic—it replaces, rather than supplements, human labor. Startups operate with tiny teams where AI agents handle work previously done by many, making the high token bill financially viable as it offsets much larger personnel costs. The conclusion is that "vibe coding" isn't dead, but its economics fail within traditional corporate structures that treat AI as a productivity add-on for existing staff. Success requires a foundational shift to an AI-native organization, where processes are built to be "legible to AI," and the company's core knowledge and assets reside in documented, AI-accessible systems rather than solely in employees' minds. The future divide will be between companies that merely add AI tools and those that redesign their organizations around them.

marsbit38 min fa

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

marsbit38 min fa

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

In the past month, the market has been actively trading contrasting expectations, balancing global supply chain disruptions fueling re-inflation against both actual and anticipated (Walsh) interest rate hikes. This volatility has impacted commodities and most equities, though tech has temporarily benefited from concentrated short-term liquidity. Fundamentally, as previously analyzed regarding the Strait of Hormuz situation, the US faces deep-seated balance sheet issues beyond what any single Fed chair can resolve. Hypotheses around a figure like Walsh could only materialize if AI fundamentally reshapes production relations. Until then, most non-AI-leading nations (effectively all except the US and China) risk fiscal and monetary policy collapse, rendering the identity of the Fed chair ultimately irrelevant. For crypto assets, there is currently no clear role in these dominant narratives. The market remains strongly capped by the 200-day moving average. While trends may shift from "anything but AI" to "anything but mines," this phase is dominated by the silicon vs. carbon (AI vs. traditional) dichotomy, leaving little room for crypto—though its time will come. **Market Overview & Commentary** The crypto market lacks significant catalysts beyond hype, plagued by low volume and scarce innovation, with clear technical resistance. Currently, crypto struggles for attention as global focus lies elsewhere. Assets like gold, oil, and grains are more direct hedges against supply-chain-driven inflation/stagflation. Bitcoin needs more time for capitulation and consolidation; this reset is expected to last until at least Q4 2026. Looking ahead, three factors will likely drive future market volatility: 1. Whether Walsh repeats the patterns of predecessors like Bassant or Musk, shifting stance into a new policy cycle. 2. The market underestimates the severity of global supply chain damage and the prolonged time needed for repair, which will eventually lead to recognition of acute resource shortages and price swings. 3. AI non-beneficiary, high-inflation nations (e.g., UK, Japan) will face severe fiscal and monetary crises. Rapid AI-driven displacement could trigger a collapse of existing credit and welfare systems. Ultimately, the market may realize that an AI bubble burst could spark contagious sovereign credit crises. The monetary and fiscal responses to such a scenario could serve as the ultimate catalyst for Bitcoin's next major bull run.

marsbit1 h fa

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare SWAP

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di TrustSwap (SWAP) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente TrustSwapSWAP.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva TrustSwap (SWAP)Dopo aver acquistato TrustSwap (SWAP), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia TrustSwap (SWAP)Scambia facilmente TrustSwap (SWAP) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

140 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2025.03.21

Come comprare SWAP

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di SWAP SWAP sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片