Sub-Saharan Africa’s Crypto Revolution: 40% Of Economy Now In Stablecoins

bitcoinistPubblicato 2024-10-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-10-03

Introduzione

Rising stablecoins in Sub-Saharan Africa are transforming the financial landscape, providing a lifeline to millions of desperate individuals struggling against...

Rising stablecoins in Sub-Saharan Africa are transforming the financial landscape, providing a lifeline to millions of desperate individuals struggling against instability in their economies.

According to recent reports, stablecoins now make up 43% of total cryptocurrency transactions in this region. These are closely associated with currency devaluation and inflation that has driven most individuals and businesses to seek such an alternative that is potentially less volatile for the fulfillment of their financial needs.

A Change In Financial Policymaking

Stablecoins have been adopted massively in countries such as Nigeria and Ethiopia, even with inflation biting at the traditional currencies whereby the citizens have resorted to using digital money such as USDT and USDC to help preserve their savings.

In Nigeria, for instance, stablecoin transactions under $1 million approached $3 billion early this year, showcasing their importance for small to medium-sized transfers. Many Nigerians use cryptocurrencies to pay bills and other transactions, said Moyo Sodipo, COO of the Nigerian crypto exchange Busha. “It has now become practical for everyday transactions,” he said.

Source: Chainalysis

This is in line with a more general Sub-Saharan tendency. Comprising 2.7% of world transaction volume, the area raised on-chain value by $7.5 billion from July 2023 to June 2024. Countries like Kenya and South Africa are equally ascending in crypto adoption, with Kenya ranked 11th and South Africa 31st in Chainalysis’ Global Crypto Adoption Index.

Stablecoins As Economic Stabilizers

Stablecoins are proving central in stabilizing economies that otherwise tend to be easily disrupted because of currency fluctuations. According to Chris Maurice, the chief executive at Yellow Card, the digital currencies become a practical substitute for businesses involved in international trade in view of the foreign exchange shortages in Nigeria. “The banks don’t have dollars, the government doesn’t have dollars,” he noted, underscoring the urgent need for alternatives.

As of Oct. 3, 2014, the market cap of cryptocurrencies stood at $2.08 trillion. Chart: TradingView.com

Ethiopia is another nation seeing significant rise in stablecoin use; retail-sized transfers of the stablecoin rise by 180% year over year. This rise followed the government’s drastic devaluation of the birr currency by restricting the local currency to reduce borrowing from foreign financial institutions. These trends are best represented by how stablecoins can serve as a cushion to an economy seeking to increase its resilience to financial stress within economically unstable regions of Sub-Saharan Africa.

Source: Chainalysis

Future For Crypto In Sub-Saharan Africa

The possibility for economic development is clearer as Sub-Saharan Africa keeps embracing cryptocurrencies—especially stablecoins. As of 2021, the World Bank projects that just 49% of the region’s people had access to a bank account. For many who are unbanked or underbanked, cryptocurrencies show promise as a result of their lack of access.

Clearer regulatory regimes in various jurisdictions also help support growth within the crypto space. South Africa sets the lead with a well-rounded proactive regulating framework that gives power to cryptocurrency entities without putting consumers at risk. As more and more people seek out improved access and stability through digital currency, Sub-Saharan Africa is set to drive global crypto adoption.

Featured image from SEGURA Consulting LLC, chart from TradingView

Christian Encila

Christian Encila

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Letture associate

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit4 min fa

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit4 min fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手4 min fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手4 min fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2 h fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2 h fa

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

The article discusses the immense popularity of the "2x Long SK Hynix ETF" (07709.HK) in Hong Kong, which became the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF by May 2026. Launched in October 2025, the ETF's net value soared over 1000% in seven months, significantly outperforming the 324% gain of SK Hynix's underlying stock, driven by the AI boom and a critical shift in industry demand from computing power to memory. It highlights the mechanics and risks of daily-rebalanced leveraged ETFs. In a smooth bullish market, they generate amplified returns, but during volatile periods—exemplified by market swings during geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz in March-April 2026—they suffer severe "volatility decay," where choppy price action can cause losses far exceeding twice the drop of the underlying asset. The piece frames SK Hynix, as NVIDIA's primary HBM supplier, within the classic cycle of the memory chip industry—a commoditized sector prone to boom-and-bust cycles of shortage, price hikes, overcapacity, and crashes. While current AI-driven demand and high margins (Q1 2026毛利率~79%) create a "super cycle," the article questions its sustainability. It warns that extreme profits will inevitably tempt competitors like Samsung and Micron to ramp up HBM production, potentially eroding scarcity. Furthermore, the entire narrative remains tethered to the massive AI capital expenditure of tech giants. In conclusion, the ETF's trajectory symbolizes the accelerated, all-in nature of the current AI revolution, where timeframes are compressed and market moves are extreme. However, it also underscores that while industry trends define ultimate returns, macro-geopolitical risks dictate the volatile and uncertain path to get there.

marsbit2 h fa

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片