JPMorgan: доходность майнинга первой криптовалюты падает третий месяц подряд

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2023-12-01Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-10-01

  • Аналитики подсчитали, что ежедневный доход от добычи биткоина достиг рекордно низких значений.
  • Третий месяц подряд показатель снижается, отмечают в JPMorgan.
  • В сентябре майнинговые компании зарабатывали в среднем $42 100 на 1 EH/s.

Эксперты финансового конгломерата JPMorgan пришли к выводу, что ежедневный доход от майнинга биткоина, как и валовая прибыль, демонстрирует рекордно низкие значения третий месяц подряд. Об этом пишет CoinDesk со ссылкой на отчет аналитиков.

Представители компании отметили, что средний хешрейт биткоина вырос на 2% в сравнении с августом 2024 года. Показатель достиг отметки в 643 EH/s, по данным JPMorgan.

Рост также показал курс первой криптовалюты, отметили эксперты. Однако это не позволило компаниям по добыче биткоина увеличить доходы в данном сегменте, подчеркнули они.

В сентябре 2024 года майнеры ежедневно в среднем получали $42 100 за 1 EH/s. Это на 6% меньше, чем в августе. Отметим, что в тот период компании из упомянутого сегмента в среднем зарабатывали по $43 600 за каждый экзахеш в секунду в виде суточных вознаграждений за блок.

При этом комиссионные за транзакции аналитики компании назвали «сдержанными». Они не превышали 5% от награды за каждый добытый блок.

Несмотря на падение доходов от майнинга первой криптовалюты, суммарная рыночная стоимость компаний по добыче биткоина продемонстрировала рост. Общая оценка 14 публичных американских фирм из этой сферы увеличилась на 4% и превысила $21 млрд, заявили в JPMorgan.

В июне 2024 года эксперты конгломерата отмечали, что стоимость этих компаний впервые достигла уровня в $22,8 млрд. Таким образом этот показатель также сократился, в сравнении с летним рекордом.

Что касается годовой волатильности первой криптовалюты, то она в сентябре составила 44%, что меньше 62%, зафиксированных в августе 2024 года, сказано в отчете.

Напомним, мы писали, что эксперты проанализировали угрозу майнинга для энергетики Украины.

Letture associate

Chainlink Adds 6,100 Wallets In Two Days In Strongest Growth Burst Of 2026

Chainlink experienced its strongest wallet growth burst of 2026, adding approximately 6,100 new addresses in just two days. This notable increase in network participation occurred despite LINK's price trading in a difficult market environment alongside other altcoins. The surge in new wallets is seen as a positive signal for user and investor interest, suggesting the ecosystem continues to attract attention even when price action is weak. Wallet growth is considered a useful metric as it measures real participation rather than just price speculation. For an infrastructure project like Chainlink, whose value is tied to oracle services, data, and real-world assets, such growth indicates ongoing engagement with its core technology. However, the article notes that this data point, while constructive, is not conclusive on its own. The nature of the new wallets—whether they belong to small holders, new users, or exchange-related entities—remains unclear. The report maintains a balanced perspective, stating that while this wallet growth is a positive adoption signal for LINK bulls, it does not guarantee a price increase. Skeptics may question whether this user growth translates into value capture for the token. The key takeaway is that this burst of activity should be monitored alongside other factors like transaction volume, price structure, and broader market trends for a more complete picture. The signal requires follow-through in price and demand to be fully validated.

bitcoinist3 min fa

Chainlink Adds 6,100 Wallets In Two Days In Strongest Growth Burst Of 2026

bitcoinist3 min fa

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbit1 h fa

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

marsbit1 h fa

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手1 h fa

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片